The working world, when it was male dominant, was 100x more fun to work in. Guys could "shoot-the-shit" with each other, say whatever they wanted and competitiveness was seen as fun not as "toxic". The work environment when it was male dominant made people better because the men would compete with one another and strive to improve. Work was actually a lot more "fun" and in some ways it was a "safe-space" for men to get away from all the drama and toxicity that existed in their personal lives.
Women have utterly destroyed the workplace. Men's lives are inarguably much worse with women in the workplace. Nothing good has come of this.
I don't know, being able to get people fired for nothing is a pretty fun hobby for them.
You know what's a more fun hobby? Spending one hour a day cooking and cleaning and doing whatever the hell you want the remaining 23 hours. Maybe change that to 4 and 20 if you have a brand new baby.
Women have no idea how good they had it. Their idea of oppressive patriarchal servitude is what men call "retirement".
This is correct. I did a stint as a house husband once when I was in between jobs.
I know my way around the kitchen better than most women, and am competent at cleaning. Maintaining a house properly is actually pretty hard work.
Cooking an hour a day? Clearly you've never cooked full meals before. I spend 4-5 hours a day in the kitchen to do these things:
Make breakfast (30 minutes)
Make bread (30 minutes)
Prep for Supper (30 minutes, 1 hour for more difficult meals)
Make lunch (30 minutes)
Make Supper (1 hour, for simpler meals. Traditional meals take more time, 2-3 hours)
Manage the ferments (20 minutes)
Clean (30 minutes)
That doesn't include time spent getting and organizing the groceries. Note that I don't have the time necessary to make proper traditional meals like I would like, just simple things. So Soups, Casseroles, Roasts and so on. Prep includes things like homemade broths and stocks for those soups. For the traditional meals, double all the times.
Why do you do this?
You can skip half those meals and for "traditional" meals most of the prep time should be passive. Throw beans or lentils in a bowl to soak, put stuff in pot to stew, or brine things in a jar or bag.
You are incredibly inefficient in your cooking. You do not even need breakfast as none of your family are working in the fields. You can easily get away with a small lunch, a few protein snacks for variety, and a large dinner.
Tell my hungry Toddlerthat breakfast can be skipped, then.
And the prep time is definitely not passive. I soak beans, yes, but also chop and clean vegetables, caramelize onions, make doughs, wash rice and barley etc.
I don't need to clean meat very much or remove the silverskin, because my wife is a vegetarian, but that is also part of prep and it's not passive.
Traditional meals, like this, or this, or this all require active prep and involvement.
You know why I do it? Because this type of food, eaten with my family, is part of inculturation and education as well as binding the family together.
Here's a really tasty cookie recipe, so you can have something nice for yourself. Merry Christmas.
So what you're saying is you make a lavish banquet every day, complete with a brand new loaf of bread on the daily, and you still only work half the amount of time a man is expected to?
I am a man, I work full time. I also feed the family because my wife's mother is a fucking harridan and she never learned to cook like I can--it makes me happy to feed my family, so she baby-wrangles and I cook.
FTFY.
Workplace drama is the least of my concerns.
Their presence in the workplace led to more dollars in circulation and therefore a decreased value of the dollar. Now both the mom and dad have to work to afford what they could back when only the dad worked decades ago.
When every adult in the household is at work, there's nobody to watch the kids. When the adults do get home, they're already tired and probably have a lot of things on their minds besides the kids.
Women who put career first are fighting their inherent biologies. Many who reach middle age without kids will have no joy in their lives at all.
And no, a cat is not a fur baby. There is so such thing as a fur baby.
It was actually inflation of the late 60’s into the 70’s which drove women into the workplace. Where once a man could support a middle class family, inflation ruined this. So women went to work. Fed monetary policy is the primary driver of inflation. They know what they’re doing and what the effect of that is.
Inflation doesn’t help but I don’t buy the idea of women entering the labor force to support their families. They decided to work for selfish reasons.
Doubling the labor force cuts wages in half. Women not staying home means money spent on eating out, hiring maids, daycare for the kids. There is no way it balances out in the end.
Lack of income never forced women into the workforce en masse before. Clearly, it was done intentionally by malicious forces, pushing it artificially on the population. Every stage of feminism was pushed by globalists to hurt us.
Because more people are working the doat had less value? Thats the most retarded thing i ever heard
Is not as much as before, there is a lot of tension because women are beginning to be jealous of other women that used their victimhood card to get ahead. It would be funny if it was not extremely sad for guys.
He's a broken record and everyone is waiting for the new album to drop.
I'm waiting for that 🔥 mixtape
My Walkman is ready.
Now that's what I call "misogyny", the debut release from Impossible Inc.
What does that even mean, in this context?
You only ever screech "women bad". Many of us are bored with it. It doesn't contribute to the conversation most of the time. I would like you to focus on contributing to the discourse in ways that don't involve making everything an excuse to get on your soapbox about your singular obsession. Find something new to say. That's what I mean.
This post is literally "women bad", what do you expect the comments to be?
Extensive discussion of the meaning of life?
A full dissertation on the US Constitution?
A conversation about what wine pairs best with salmon?
Do you have any good recommendations for salmon and wine? I keep screwing that one up.
It's my stormcuck fans. I have less than Jester because I don't really go after them unless they spam or annoy me.
As I said before, no, not true.
Most on the far right agree with you in general about women. We just go a step further.
It's only when you start to sperg against people pointing out alternative causes that you get the downvotes.
Jester gets mass downvoted because he's a huge flaming faggot who has pissed off virtually everyone on this forum. The only people who don't hate him at this point are those that tolerate him because apparently being a "stormcuck" is worse than being a grifting faggot on a downward spiral into unhinged madness.
It's probably a few things in both cases. Jester's wokewashing list is useful and I just ignore most rants on here anyway regardless of topic. However Imp spams the board more in regards to rule 14 [5 posts a day] which has grown to annoy me over the last few months despite my own comments about it in the past.
You can't MeToo over Microsoft Teams, thankfully. Everything is recorded.
Another reason I kind of like Microsoft. They produced a solution to the MeToo cult.
Remember that those people that got canceled that way are public figures and as yet, I am not.
I hope you’re getting paid for this limpdick shilling you’re doing.
I mean, I own a large amount of their stock if that counts.
But I'm not shilling. I genuinely like Microsoft products. I find they are good quality most of the time, and compared to the likes of Google and Apple which I fucking hate, they're a good company.
I got MeToo’d over Facebook, effectively…
You definitely can, dude. Because they don’t NEED proof. Their word against yours is enough.
Jussayin’.
Devil's advocate: On the computer tech employee only social media app, Blind, Microsoft employees are by far the least woke and troll san fransisco tech employees.
Totally agree, everyone is less fulfilled and less happy. The amount of professional women I know in their 30's who are sad and childless, as well as absolutely hate their jobs is basically all of them.
For men it's simply a trashcan fire. Constant tip-toeing around the tulips. I've been in workplaces where asking a woman to do work was basically considered an act of aggression.
When you mentioned competition it made me think, to be honest I really don't try anymore at work. Not that I do a bad job, but being I'm in the corporate world there's really zero incentive to push yourself anymore. Simply being decent is above average anyway and when you get to a certain point you're really blocked out of advancement options. Not that I'd even want to advance to that anymore because at that same threshold everything about the job becomes political.
Like the other said too, women's lives are worse off as well. If I were to think about women I know who are the happiest, the whopping two women I know who are stay-at-home mom's for the most part would definitely be very high on the list. I'd not even say it's because they get to sit home and be lazy all day. The women put in the competitive environments just aren't cut out for it. Men can compete with each other one minute then go have a drink with each other the next. Women are too cutthroat, their competition becomes a part of them and they can't let it go. Their nature is to not allow them to disconnect things it seems.
Every self reported study done on women, be it from college, hs, work etc. shows that women believe they work harder than men to achieve the same results. They argue it is because of bias, which is laughable. Society has conditioned women to believe they are equal in all capacities that men are, when reality hits they claim bias.
I don't give a shit what any self-reported study shows. The only information you can ever get from a self-reported study is the bias of the people doing the reporting. All that study shows me is that women think their jobs are supposed to be easier and don't want to admit that men have always had to work harder than they realized and are just used to it.
I thought this is actually basically what the other poster is saying.
I'm agreeing with him
Science student here: this is… Depressing. 😐
Even we can’t escape from this, hey?
This. I quit working for a large multi-national company and took a position in a small boutique software development company. Pays well, work hours are flexible being largely performance based, office culture is really relaxed. There isn't an HR department. All employees asides from admin are male.
I've been thinking about making this change as well. Currently working on shoring up some of my healthcare needs before I jump ship. How should I go about finding a place like this?
I also am a little picky about the direction I'm heading career-wise - I don't just want to do basic web dev, any recommendations on how to find leads or where to search? Networking was OK before the pandemic but now everything is weird.
Networking, I'm afraid.
Long story short, I emigrated just before the pandemic hit to take care of a parent. Decided to hang around, with the pandemic and all, and needed employment so I reached out to some folks I knew. Got lucky.
Now, despite not being fond of where I'm living, I'm actually reluctant to leave as I haven't enjoyed work this much since... shit, the honeymoon period of my gamedev career.
Boutique software shops tend to specialize, and be picky about who they hire given the small team size. Regardless of networking, proof of work/ability in the domain you'll be working in is a must.
Thanks. So I should somehow make my moves within the globocorps, try to complete some project to make myself stand out, and keep my eyes peeled for some well-run operations in the field as time goes on? I think that seems reasonable
Regarding your last point, my problem is the work from my current job is not showcase-worthy, I just do a bunch of small fixes, find solutions to really annoying technical problems, and help carry the water of those who can't on their own. For personal projects, I can never really finish anything when there is no real purpose for it. I've been stuck like this since the pandemic started and I'm not sure what to do
I was in a meeting about how to be promoted. The white 40+yr old women presenting told us "we're looking to promote people... gestures to room of white men not like you". The black women they promoted spend all say on slack complaining about how theyre oppressed. Only a small group of white men and east asians keep the company running.
Why even bother? Do all the work and not even get matching compensation.
Most at this point do the minimum required or move to Indian companies that hire them into high management positions as white monkeys.
Pretty much every industry has been coopted and they're all held together by the few remaining core employees who do the vast majority of the work.
We're set for another global bubble burst as soon as people in these companies realize that they can just leave.
"I'd not even say it's because they get to sit home and be lazy all day." I'm sure you're not saying a stay-at-home Mom sits home and is lazy all day?
I could give examples of those that do and don't.
Ad a stay at home Mom with a 5 month old and an insanely wild boy who's going to be 2 in two months...I'm not sure how any sahm can just laze around all day. This is the most high stress, frantic existence I've ever lived. Even now, I just got one to sleep and I'm feeding the other...next I have to frantically do the dishes and put the laundry in the dryer before one of them wakes up. My husband works on ships...when he left he told me he feels like he's going on vacation and he has no idea how I do it alone. I can't even construct a scenario in my imagination where a sahm could be lazy if she wanted to.
Part of the challenge is that historically, women never raised kids in a setting alone. No woman before the last 100 years had to do what you are doing. Kids were raised in the company of many other children, teenagers, other moms, and also men who were around much more. Nearly everyone used to be farmers on plots of land next to their homes. And there weren't dangerous things everywhere, like chemicals, scissors, electrical sockets, etc. You could literally just let a kid roam and hope the wolves didn't get them. If a child died it was definitely sad, but mom wouldn't be thrown in prison, either.
I notice when I'm around my little nieces and nephews, the parents visibly relax and everyone just kind of keeps their eyes open for the kids. It's way more peaceful and I think it's better for the kids, too.
Not disagreeing with the bulk of your comment, but I'm sure if you're aware that 100 years ago was 1921. You know. The Roarin' 20's? Literally the decade that brought us automobiles, radio, and film? Huge economic growth with massive shifts in culture?
I treasure your historical knowledge and accuracy Mr. FutaCumDiet.
You're presuming the kids are at home. The one I know of the kids are at school and from what I can tell the extent of what she does is pick them up from school and I guess put up with them for an hour after. It's probably an unusual dynamic but it's one of the more lopsided relationships I've seen that has gone on that long
Easy, abandon any and all duty and responsibility. Have someone you've abused sufficiently to break their will pick up the slack for you, be it parents, partners or elder offspring.
I mean...nearly every chore at home can be automated and babies sleep half the day.
I'm a parent and he's absolutely correct. We have dishwashers, computer controlled ovens, baby formula, washing machines. We live in a Jetsons future where our lives are almost entirely automated by robots. Raising our kid has been easiest thing in the world. I don't know what people are complaining about.
The only hard part is that he sucks at sleeping, which isn't that big a deal because my wife deals with him at night because I have to be at work in the morning, then I deal with him in the afternoon as she takes a nap.
Flavored vegetable oil.
Another hard part is that you're always at work. You can't ever truly relax because the kid is always there. When I visit my sister and her two kids, I'm ready to shoot myself after 48 hours lol
I'm not giving advice, I'm commenting.
If you want parenting advice, ask a father.
I can't imagine you ever being a father, considering your massively retarded opinions on women.
I'm not a father, that's why I said that.
Don't ask me for parenting advice because my advice is don't have a kid.
Half of your kids aren't even yours, tradcucks.
Not really, no. I just had better things to do than argue with idiots who actually think "genetic dead end" means something in an era where even those with severe genetic illnesses can reproduce.
Except proper cooking. A well done meal will take around two hours in terms of prep work, cooking, and cleaning up after. At least, a meal of my standards will. I would expect no less of a wife.
Yep. We stopped making breakfast, partly because it's too much work. We have to cook everything from scratch to avoid migraines and can never eat out or buy a loaf of bread or processed meat. Any joker who thinks you can provide 3 proper meals a day and do the dishes in half an hour is a complete idiot.
Breakfast is pretty much always a mistake anyway in the modern era, so I'm fine forgoing that so long as dinner is a proper meal.
For my ancestors , lunch was the largest meal of the day. Working away from home screwed up that concept.
I was never happier in my entire life than when I had communal meals with my friends in college. Everyone is shattered into their private homes where sometimes immediate families don't even eat together and it's the saddest thing ever. We need to rekindle that sense of a village and a community that comes together to share meals. It's some low level human psychological need that most of us are missing out on.
Yeah I wouldn't even expect a woman to put in all that effort for three meals a day for the whole family, just dinner and a lighter meal for the kids earlier or their school lunches. I can fry up some eggs for myself if I need something quick for energy.
"Three meals a day" is a shitty meme.
You don't need breakfast, and can choose between lunch and dinner as your main meal.
I personally just eat one meal a day for dinner and that's it. The rest of the day is water.
For kids you can just give them protein supplements throughout the day. Lightly pan fry some eggs in the morning, give them some preserved meat for lunch, and feed them like kings at night.
astutely put
There's times i wonder what it would take to start up a chain of "Gentlemen's Clubs" in this day and age. Nothing like a titty bar or Playboy club, more along the lines of a Victorian-era gathering place where men could get away from the outside to go to sit and think, have a decent drink, get a good meal, read a book, have a smoke, or shoot the shit and do business with one another, without the meddling influence of women getting in the way.
Granted, I'm sure some women's group would pitch a bitch about the membership restrictions, but so long as it was maintained as a private club that only admits members, Constitutional right of freedom of association would allow us to tell them to go pound sand.
EDIT: And yes, I'm aware of the Elks, Moose, Masons, and other groups that have long since been in existence. I'm talking about something new that isn't just a watering hole for the local townies that occasionally do fundraisers for the local school or the like.
Women just have to invade male spaces, so it won't work. This shit is real. In UK every last male space is besieged by claims of mysogeny.
I remember there used to be a thing called 'boy scouts', not anymore
I think it's being done artificially. Your average woman doesn't care, and I would guess would want men to have their own spaces. It's mostly globalists and one of their tentacles (feminism) that's pushing for the destruction of male only spaces. Why? It weakens men, the gender that's most likely to see through the globalist lies and fight back against them. That's why men are denigrated in every area the globalists control.
No, women have done this shit for centuries.
Only when a society has become uber successful, like ours has. Success breeds abundance, safety, and technological progress which puts up barriers between people and nature. Nature culls stupid individuals and stupid practices. As stupidity propagates, the society collapses, hardship reigns again, the barriers to nature disappear, and the hard lessons are relearned. Feminism, and other stupid practices, cease to exist in hardship, and in a SHTF scenario women cease to be strong independent women immediately, and want men to protect and provide for them.
However, this modern push for feminism is absolutely unnatural. Some indoctrined bitter useful idiot women are involved, yes, but it's mostly pushed by malicious forces that use feminism to weaken us and gain power.
In the US we still have the right to freedom of association, and so long as the club is kept to an exclusive membership and does not allow non-members entry, the feminists and wokies don't have a leg to stand on. That's where things like the Boy Scouts got screwed over - because they essentially let anyone from the public join, they forfeited their right to bar membership to the opposite sex.
Since 'gender identity' is protected now I'd assume you'll wind up with entirely too many oddly short manlets with soft faces.
Just call them what they truly are, a fucking matriarchal minstrel show.
If it's a private club, the club controls the admission criteria and can accept or deny any member. First rule of gatekeeping, you go hard or you risk getting invaded.
The wife's boyfriend would probably be all in favor and would tell his bitch to shut the hell up and deal with it.
That's why you gatekeep the shit out of the membership and keep the soycucks out. And even if one did get in and his wife's boyfriend found out about it, we'd probably boot the cuck and offer his membership to the chad his wife was banging.
Don't you have guys' nights and such with your guy friends?
Yeah, but it's also nice to have unplanned guys' nights at any time with new people from your community that you may not know.
What community? There's no community anywhere these days. It's all just people who happen to live in the same geographic region.
I do, I just wished my friends would not be on the left and spend half the time talking about how women and immigrants are wonderful. They know how I stand on it and last time it did not end well.
Gatekeep.
Facts. I used to be a mortgage broker. We had an all-male staff for the first two years I worked there and we had a fucking blast. Then they hired two women in the same month and the vibe changed completely.
The first week that the first women was there, I was in my office speaking with a client and I said, "Great, I'll have my secretary prepare the forms and send them your way before end of business."
The next morning I had an email in my inbox from our new female co-worker. It was almost two pages worth of text. She was livid lol and she scolded me for referring to her as, "my secretary." She told me she isn't my secretary and that it was rude, inconsiderate, blah blah blah.
I told her I wasn't referring to her. I had been using that line (which was a lie) for two years before we had any female staff. I used that line to make client's think we were a bigger shop than we really were.
She refused to believe me and she filed a complaint with the owner haha. The owner knew I'd been using that line all along and sided with me, but the cunt wouldn't let it go and she was always a huge bitch to me until she quit a few months later.
Lol what a self-absorbed woman if her first thought was you were talking about her.
But I guess I'm being redundant
Jfc...
da fuck?
Just listen to this female attorney talking to Justice Clarence Thomas. This is how you know women do not belong in any role that requires competency and impartiality.
All Thomas was doing was trying to clarify the context of the discussion. That's why he asked her, is it about abortion as a right, or is it privacy, or what? What is the actual right being discussed here? If it were a right enumerated in the Constitution, then the context would be obvious, but since it isn't, he wants clarification.
That's why he repeats, "yeah I know we're talking about abortion" after her spiel. She tried her speech as a way to impress him with her vocabulary or argue her case for abortion, but he was asking for a very simple thing from her. Finally she admits it is about abortion as a right, after "helpfully" defining abortion for him as a totally non-sadistic thing.
And he says, thanks, because he's fucking done at this point. He didn't want to hear all that shit. He just wanted a simple answer like any man would, so that he would know how to proceed.
Men are straight forward and simple. Ask a guy if this shirt is okay? Answer would be "nah, man. Look like shit" or "yeah, looks chad".
When asking a girl if this shirt is okay.. she thinks of tone. She thinks of how to not hurt feelings. She thinks of a negative and positive.. its overly complicated.. which is exactly what wokeness is. Woke is over complicated thinking. Anyhting that is overly complicated will fail more easily. Its why most of their arguments are shit or hypocritical or inconsistent. Always some bullshit caveat or exception.
This is why I tend to distrust anyone or anything that is overly verbose. Truth is elegant in its simplicity.
You speak my mind, public education keeps pumping out these useless pseudo-intellectuals that says lot of things to mean very simple statement. It's tiresome.
The most stupid thing in school is minimum word counts or pages; good writing, like good thinking, is concise. Only exceptions are story telling in its various forms.
I've never understood why 5 pages of extraneous bullshit is supposed to be considered a well written and thought out essay when a page or two would suffice.
Do people honestly want to read Moby Dick length paragraphs for pages on end? Hell, I haven't even finished that book because I keep falling asleep trying to finish a chapter that keeps going on and on about whale bones.
Friendly reminder that Critical Race Theory got it's start in the legal community.
Also note Barack Obama, a guy mentored by a leftist terrorist, was a constitutional law professor at a law school.
The legal field is pozzed.
I'm not sure how doing anything besides directly answering the question isn't contempt of court. She should have been arrested on the spot, tbh.
After we repeal RvW hopefully a lot of doctors and women start getting arrested and prosecuted for murdering the unborn.
Honestly, the left can murder as many of their own babies as they want if they spend their own money.
No. It's still evil and should be prevented.
I'm utterly impressed by her ability to speak so many words without saying a single thing.
No umms or pauses or mispronunciations. She's like a robot.
Work place culture aside, it's been a financial disaster for men and women both. Before women were shoved into work, a man could make enough money to support a stay at home wife, 3 kids, and a mortgage on a nice house. You could save money too without much debt.
Now we have twice as many people and half as much income. Both parents have to work to pay the bills and spend almost one of their salaries on childcare and other expenses they wouldn't goddamn have if one of them could stay home with the kids. Women are told they can have a good career and be a good mom at the same time. Most don't believe it. That's why they try to marry a rich guy and quit their job, or they stay single or childless to focus on work. Women who prioritize motherhood are almost always happier.
I know there are a lot of other factors involved, inflation, globalization, etc, but women entering the workforce is one of the biggest reasons work sucks for everybody.
Came here to post just this. None of this was done on accident.
There is an old Alex Jones interview with Aaron Russo from about 2006, and he talks about how one of his Rockefeller friends laid it all out to him, and how the feminism movement was a Rockefeller controlled effort, to increase the workforce and give government more control over children.
Russo seemed to be telling the truth, nothing weird in his body language and he corrected Jones a few times when Jones said things a little over the top, and everything he said really looks true when watched today. Russo knew he had cancer when he gave that interview, so I think he just told what he knew straight since he wasn't worried about them killing him.
In every conceivable way, it weakens men, women, children, and society. Every stage of feminism was pushed on purpose, artificially by malicious forces (globalists). With both parents working, who is raising the children?
That's because a man treats it as a fun game or a way to sharpen his skills. It's not really personal, and we all respect raw ability because we can be objective about it. That's why we reward it.
The woman, on the other hand, not only can't compete with us but sees any attempt to try as undermining her ability to be seen as an equal. She would rather look at "the group" so that nobody stands out and nobody gets "hurt" by contributing less. A man sees that as a challenge to do better, or tease his coworkers until they do, since we intuitively know that a man not carrying his weight is dragging the entire team down and making the rest of us work harder.
Instead of having fun, the woman defines competitiveness as toxic and says we should focus on how everyone contributes in their own way lol. I totally agree with you. Women should not be in the workforce at all, but particularly in any technical or authoritative profession. No female police, lawyers, engineers, judges, politicians, school principals, etc.
If women ran society... we literally would still be living in mud huts cause no one wants to work harder. Innovation also requires competitiveness and aggression (and war). A lot of the world's tech and advancement is from being invented during r&d.
I've noticed another advantage to the slightly hostile competition in male only spaces, things like light ribbing, making fun of one another, and crude humor. It strengthens the men in the space and weeds out weak individuals, that could bring down the entire group. It also helps build camaraderie. I'm pretty sure it's a genetically learned mental trait to increase survival.
That's me at work right now, having to pick up the slack of two women because they can't handle the workload.
Fortunately I got a bit of how it was in a men dominated environment. My first job was as a game tester, it payed next to nothing but was fun and it was all guys. I think there was one girl on the dev team doing fixes. It was a lot of fun, a lot of pranks, games and stupid jokes.
Now however, it makes no difference. I'm working from home and interactions are few and all about work stuff.
Women wanted freedom from being a slave in the home, looking after children and husband. Instead they wanted to be a slave in the workplace.
They got what they wanted and yet they still complain.
They don’t even know what they want, much less what is good for them. It’s better not to listen to them, and just do what is right.
I've seen this posted a lot on 4chan, and it definitely cuts to the heart of the bullshit of the feminist message of women in the workforce.
Women working for her husband and children: slavery and patriarchy Women working for a company: empowered and free
I legitimately quit a job four years ago because they stopped putting the employee performance stats and leaderboards on the wall.
Masturbating to my own numbers was the only motivating factor in that job, and they took it away. ..And you just know they did it because of a woman.
You just know.
Totally agree.
I work in trades and it's 100% men on the job site and it's great.
Your post is right but,
Us men today didn't have a part with this but this is fully the fault of the men in our fathers', grandfathers' and great-grandfathers' generations. Like Adam did with Eve they completely stood by and either allowed or encouraged it to happen. Women are in the workplace today because men allowed it.
They arguably had no idea of the extent and scale of unforeseen consequences that resulted from this, but they still had a part to play in it. To be fair, I didn't realize this until the last few years, myself.
This is, of course, impotent whinging. Men really let things devolve in a bad way and I'm don't think things could get ever get back on the right track besides a collapse or something else horrible causing a societal reset.
I don’t see it as whining. We do have to recognize what happened in order to fix it. I see men blaming women for the problems between the sexes so that shows we have a long way to go in terms of understanding the cause.
All we can do is be honest and try our best to provide correction where we see error. Society will get better or worse as it will. It’s not up to us. I can only do my best to improve my own life by adhering to God’s will as much as possible.
Spot on. You get what you tolerate.
Ngl I wish I was born early enough to smoke in the workplace. I like to have cigars and (hand-made!) cigarillos but it's too freaking cold to smoke them for half the year. Being able to have the latter at my desk would be great.
Obligatory don't smoke etc etc.
Sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of my multi-jet torch lighting a Joya.
Haven't smoked those myself but they sound neat. Due to cost I'm still mainly getting things like General Grant cigars or other types that are hand-rolled but don't have all the fancy packaging and bands but every so often I like to spring for things like these. I swear they have a very slight cinnamon taste to them.
Check out cigar auctioneer and cigar bid. Also, name a more iconic duo than boomers and Rocky Patels. 😛
If I had $1 for every time I could hit my vape while my coworkers talked about dumbshit in a meeting in I’d retire 3 months ago
Women create rules and procedures that are independent and frequently counteract against productivity. Subverting not only the ability of employees to produce efficiently, things like HR departments are a parasite that drains a company of time and resources
HR gestapo, and diversity departments have little if anything to do with product and don't create anything for an organization but bloat and red tape. They are a direct result of Women entering the workforce, since everything had to be safe and ideologically sanitary to accommodate them.
Can women participate in businesses? Of course they can. But men's ability to compete cannot be kneecapped in the process. That mentality is a hard net negative for the entire economy
I don’t believe you can have one without the other. That’s just a fact of life. Think of the military. The moment you admit women, everything changes. The atmosphere, the standards, the expectations. You can’t expect everyone to give their best when the women’s best is the average man’s worst.
You are wrong. Plenty of good came out of this. Let me think back in my career to give you many examples..
a little further back.
Shit!
Also got paid more. Also had a lot more marriage-aged women looking to settle down.
I’d say the lost of companionship is also a factor. The enormous push of calling any group of men hanging out as “gay” has done incredible damage to male fellowship. Few things remain that provide then fellowship but they are slowly being killed the governments of the word.
I think the "gay" is less damaging than the fact that men have to now include gays and women or be a bigot. I've been in male-only groups and the way in which women react when they hear about male-only groups is extremely belligerent, aggressive and combative. Women want to destroy these groups. I grew up playing sports and every guy joked about other guys being gay but it was all jokes and no one took it seriously. The "gay" didn't destroy the men's-only groups. The women truly destroyed these groups. Women specifically targeted these men-only groups and still do to this day because feminists know if men had an opportunity to congregate as men-only that poses a threat to women. Governments latched onto this because men are easier to control when they're not congregating with other men but are forced to congregate with women. By controlling the women then the government controls the men and the government doesn't have to fear any resistance because the men don't congregate with men anymore thanks to women destroying it. The fag thing you describe sounds nice as a rationale and in some regards, it's humiliating and adds insult to injury but the brunt of the damage was caused by women. Men can get over the gay thing and not give a shit because that's what men do. Women change everything though and their presence makes it difficult for men to be men anymore.
Anything that was male dominated... now becomes mediocre or trash when women get involved. There was a kotaku article recently shitting on nintendo japan for having only 5% women in management positions lol.
And guess what?? Nintendo is profitable and respectable. Then you look at microsoft and sony (especially sony usa/cali) it becomes more and more shit filled with woke shit. Any company that promotes diversity of its staff or product, instead of just the good quality is most likely dog shit.
I have 5 women over the age of 50 in my office. My experience is very pleasant so far and i have almost zero complaints. One of them transferred from another department after she developed a crash on me so i moved to afternoon shift to avoid her.
I understand where you come tho, back in the 90's i used to work in a radio/tv station with an unwalled floor housing like 100 young female journalists. I lasted like 2 weeks before quitting to avoid cancer.
It's not even physically intensive jobs either but mentally intensive jobs. Every guy I know in Investment Banking that isn't brainwashed by the State's propaganda hates women in the finance industry because women in finance cause men's workload to go up. The companies consider women "equal" to men so they hire the same number of workers and in jobs where you were already working 80 hours a week, this is disastrous. The women DO NOT actually work as hard as the men. The MDs/Directors/VPs all roll out the red carpet for the women and they get away with so much. The men, especially the white men, are expected to pickup the slack and the men don't get any additional recognition. The women get fast tracked into management and higher positions. The only perk for men is that the women are always huge sluts and the guys get to fuck them but the guys have to work more in the end for it. I don't think it's a great trade-off tbh. I'd rather just fuck sluts with my off-time, which I'd get more of with less women in the office.
I know an IB shop in-town that had the majority of the team quit because it was already a lean shop when the bank decided to go all woke. When they went all woke, the workload for the remaining white guys shot up immensely and they weren't paid any more for it. The expectations just went up. The bank mandated 30% of new hires had to be women, with most of the 100% of new hires being at least POCs if not women. The city is 70% white and one of the guys who worked there told me for their summer intern positions, of the 9 candidates they were interviewing that were picked by HR, 7 of them were black, 1 was white and 1 was asian. My friend asked HR what was going on with regard to the candidate pool's race and the HR Manager said it was "their most diverse recruitment ever". My friend told the HR Manager that there was nothing diverse about 7/9 black people.
The working world is changing and not for the best. It is significantly worse for everyone now.
And people wonder why I have such a strong feeling about women.
Did you all forget what industry I work in?
Pretty much said exactly what I've wanted to say and can't work out how without doxxing myself, right down to the worthless sluts trying to get a payoff from the company by harassing men until they cave.
Journalism?
Finance. If I worked in journalism, I'd hate myself.
That's my job. Loading trucks. Guess who has to replace two women for the rest of the month because they weren't strong enough to lift 70 lb boxes for hours at a time (which is a requirement to be hired btw)?
I load 53 foot trailers at my job. I was assigned a much harder truck at work because the two women who were loading it before me couldn't keep up with it. Now my workload is tripled for the rest of the month.
Why they keep hiring women for these manual labor jobs I will never understand. I would say about 1 in 10 actually stay for more than a couple weeks, and even then, they never do the hard trucks.
We should live in totally separate worlds, so I believe women should be free to work if they want, but they should be in their own place of work.
The problem sorts itself out. If women choose to work, that means fewer children, leading to an unsustainable society. We either correct it and they go back to being mothers instead of corporate drones, or we don’t and get replaced by a culture that understands the idea better.
Islam or communism is gonna be the reset unfortunately... one of them is gonna win in out soft society. Either one is gonna put women back in their place.
Its funny with islam being not so bad for us guys =p.
My current work assignment has me in daily contact with Muslims and yeah, I can tell you, if our women complain now....well, they don't know what they're in for.
A Muslim society treats women and children, frankly, as property. That isn't to say there isn't affection or love, but holy shit was it eye-opening to me when I first encountered this.
“ I was just wearing this fuck me senseless make up kit that I got from one of the Kardashians and my blouse opened to the bottom two buttons I don’t know why this guy keeps hitting on me “
Correction: omg, that 45yo Managing Director is so hot, I hope he noticed my breasts. I exposed them today specifically for him. I even stuffed my bra a little. I hope those botox injections make me look even more attractive to him. I wish he'd just grab me and throw me under the table to suck his dick. I'd fuck her non-stop. Maybe I could wear a little less and get away with it... OMG WHAT'S THAT INTERN DOING STARING AT ME?!?!?! RAPE RAPE RAPE RAPE
Think of the guys you know who are firemen, linemen, construction workers, equipment operators... Those guys know how to be men. And they dig it. They’re the most fun dudes to hang around.
Am (well, was) a fireman....can confirm, know how to be a man and am fun to hang around.
One could say the same thing about nigger jokes,
The workplace isn't for horsing around and socializing. BUT that's what private clubs were for. And ethnic clubs were all over the place where I'm from, so I don't see why a "white only" club is a problem.
The Nigerian at my work place makes those jokes because he knows the rest of us can't.
African immigrants are well aware of the stereotypes of American blacks and do not identify much with them, in my experience.
Having worked in some all male work spaces, yeah I kind of do understand what was taken from us. Women should be banned from the workforce or at least segregated into their own separate workforce. Everyone would be more fulfilled.
It didn't just flip magically, it was a slow process that began with world war 2 and progressed to what could be considered completion in the 2000s.
Or, if you're TheImp, is still progressing and will be completed by 2030 when women kill most the men and bar the rest from any job other than garbage collector.
The More Feminine Way.
But no, I think they'll still want sewer workers and the likes. I doubt they'd do any hard work.
Maybe they'll let Bezos hold some power and get him to make Amazon drone bots to do the work for them in exchange.
I wish people would stop using The Great Reset.
It wasn't even the title of the article, which was written by a feminist woman.
As Boris Johnson says : "Build Back Better, In a More Feminine Way.
You'll own nothing because you're filthy males and you'll be happy about it.
Hello!
If you've been through this at work, it's definitely the fanatics attitude. He's not understating it.
I still think the "they're all conspiring to commit mass murder and enslave you" sentiment is a bit of an overstatement.
I will admit there are probably 100 misandrist hiring managers to every 1 misogynist at this point, because only one of those groups is being suppressed whilst the other is practically encouraged. I'll even admit that it looks like one sex seems to, on average, need significantly less encouragement to become rampant, spiteful chauvinists.
But it's all a spectrum and only the most fanatical will still be trying to tip the balance hard against men all the way to the ground. Even if men as a whole just roll over and die, left to their own devices even feminists would probably reach an equilibrium between the rabid kill-all-men radicals and the more "moderate" feminists who think men are just somewhat dysfunctional versions of women. Probably around the point of mild inequity against men that the moderates won't have to feel too bad about.
The best solution would be to declare women who can't reason with "non serious bullshitting" mentally incompentent.
This makes me wonder, if a segregated work environment by sex would work. Obviously the woke cultist would not have it, but just imagine teams of men, working with teams of women, and each team would specialize in something different, or even overlap somewhat (in what the team does). I think it would be interesting to see.
The egalitarians would never allow this because then you'd easily be able to compare men to women and they wouldn't like the results.
Just like how they want to eliminate all unvaccinated people to get rid of the control group so people can't tell the difference between unvaccinated and vaccinated. The egalitarians don't want us to have the data to prove the difference between men and women or whites and non-whites in the workplace.
They used systematic oppression for the longest time to handwave away differences and people fell for this trick but people would be less inclined to fall for that trick now.
Completely agree. It's sad, I think women would have a space of their own that they would at least excel at, maybe like a company's marketing or client relations.
Is there a company that needs people spewing kill all men on Twitter? They're very good at that.
Can't have female coworkers sexually harassed at work if you never hire any women.
That would be the answer if the government control 60% of the economy and have anti white male/diversity quotas for contracts.
Young men today don't understand they are being feminized and neutered through the games they enjoy and media they consume.
A world of poosified betas.
I don't think that's really the case. Work's not supposed to be fun, you're supposed to be doing a job. It can be fun, but shooting the shit is always secondary.
I have women in my workplace, and the issue isn't that women exist, it's that pussies exist, and that corporate troglodytes are all pussies.
If a woman calls me a cunt, then we're good if not at least reasonable.