The working world, when it was male dominant, was 100x more fun to work in. Guys could "shoot-the-shit" with each other, say whatever they wanted and competitiveness was seen as fun not as "toxic". The work environment when it was male dominant made people better because the men would compete with one another and strive to improve. Work was actually a lot more "fun" and in some ways it was a "safe-space" for men to get away from all the drama and toxicity that existed in their personal lives.
Women have utterly destroyed the workplace. Men's lives are inarguably much worse with women in the workplace. Nothing good has come of this.
I don't know, being able to get people fired for nothing is a pretty fun hobby for them.
You know what's a more fun hobby? Spending one hour a day cooking and cleaning and doing whatever the hell you want the remaining 23 hours. Maybe change that to 4 and 20 if you have a brand new baby.
Women have no idea how good they had it. Their idea of oppressive patriarchal servitude is what men call "retirement".
This is correct. I did a stint as a house husband once when I was in between jobs.
I know my way around the kitchen better than most women, and am competent at cleaning. Maintaining a house properly is actually pretty hard work.
Cooking an hour a day? Clearly you've never cooked full meals before. I spend 4-5 hours a day in the kitchen to do these things:
Make breakfast (30 minutes)
Make bread (30 minutes)
Prep for Supper (30 minutes, 1 hour for more difficult meals)
Make lunch (30 minutes)
Make Supper (1 hour, for simpler meals. Traditional meals take more time, 2-3 hours)
Manage the ferments (20 minutes)
Clean (30 minutes)
That doesn't include time spent getting and organizing the groceries. Note that I don't have the time necessary to make proper traditional meals like I would like, just simple things. So Soups, Casseroles, Roasts and so on. Prep includes things like homemade broths and stocks for those soups. For the traditional meals, double all the times.
Why do you do this?
You can skip half those meals and for "traditional" meals most of the prep time should be passive. Throw beans or lentils in a bowl to soak, put stuff in pot to stew, or brine things in a jar or bag.
You are incredibly inefficient in your cooking. You do not even need breakfast as none of your family are working in the fields. You can easily get away with a small lunch, a few protein snacks for variety, and a large dinner.
Tell my hungry Toddlerthat breakfast can be skipped, then.
And the prep time is definitely not passive. I soak beans, yes, but also chop and clean vegetables, caramelize onions, make doughs, wash rice and barley etc.
I don't need to clean meat very much or remove the silverskin, because my wife is a vegetarian, but that is also part of prep and it's not passive.
Traditional meals, like this, or this, or this all require active prep and involvement.
You know why I do it? Because this type of food, eaten with my family, is part of inculturation and education as well as binding the family together.
Here's a really tasty cookie recipe, so you can have something nice for yourself. Merry Christmas.
So what you're saying is you make a lavish banquet every day, complete with a brand new loaf of bread on the daily, and you still only work half the amount of time a man is expected to?
I am a man, I work full time. I also feed the family because my wife's mother is a fucking harridan and she never learned to cook like I can--it makes me happy to feed my family, so she baby-wrangles and I cook.
FTFY.
Workplace drama is the least of my concerns.
Their presence in the workplace led to more dollars in circulation and therefore a decreased value of the dollar. Now both the mom and dad have to work to afford what they could back when only the dad worked decades ago.
When every adult in the household is at work, there's nobody to watch the kids. When the adults do get home, they're already tired and probably have a lot of things on their minds besides the kids.
Women who put career first are fighting their inherent biologies. Many who reach middle age without kids will have no joy in their lives at all.
And no, a cat is not a fur baby. There is so such thing as a fur baby.
It was actually inflation of the late 60’s into the 70’s which drove women into the workplace. Where once a man could support a middle class family, inflation ruined this. So women went to work. Fed monetary policy is the primary driver of inflation. They know what they’re doing and what the effect of that is.
Inflation doesn’t help but I don’t buy the idea of women entering the labor force to support their families. They decided to work for selfish reasons.
Doubling the labor force cuts wages in half. Women not staying home means money spent on eating out, hiring maids, daycare for the kids. There is no way it balances out in the end.
Lack of income never forced women into the workforce en masse before. Clearly, it was done intentionally by malicious forces, pushing it artificially on the population. Every stage of feminism was pushed by globalists to hurt us.
Because more people are working the doat had less value? Thats the most retarded thing i ever heard
Is not as much as before, there is a lot of tension because women are beginning to be jealous of other women that used their victimhood card to get ahead. It would be funny if it was not extremely sad for guys.
He's a broken record and everyone is waiting for the new album to drop.
I'm waiting for that 🔥 mixtape
My Walkman is ready.
Now that's what I call "misogyny", the debut release from Impossible Inc.
What does that even mean, in this context?
You only ever screech "women bad". Many of us are bored with it. It doesn't contribute to the conversation most of the time. I would like you to focus on contributing to the discourse in ways that don't involve making everything an excuse to get on your soapbox about your singular obsession. Find something new to say. That's what I mean.
It's my stormcuck fans. I have less than Jester because I don't really go after them unless they spam or annoy me.
As I said before, no, not true.
Most on the far right agree with you in general about women. We just go a step further.
It's only when you start to sperg against people pointing out alternative causes that you get the downvotes.
Jester gets mass downvoted because he's a huge flaming faggot who has pissed off virtually everyone on this forum. The only people who don't hate him at this point are those that tolerate him because apparently being a "stormcuck" is worse than being a grifting faggot on a downward spiral into unhinged madness.
It's probably a few things in both cases. Jester's wokewashing list is useful and I just ignore most rants on here anyway regardless of topic. However Imp spams the board more in regards to rule 14 [5 posts a day] which has grown to annoy me over the last few months despite my own comments about it in the past.
You can't MeToo over Microsoft Teams, thankfully. Everything is recorded.
Another reason I kind of like Microsoft. They produced a solution to the MeToo cult.
Remember that those people that got canceled that way are public figures and as yet, I am not.
I hope you’re getting paid for this limpdick shilling you’re doing.
I mean, I own a large amount of their stock if that counts.
But I'm not shilling. I genuinely like Microsoft products. I find they are good quality most of the time, and compared to the likes of Google and Apple which I fucking hate, they're a good company.
I got MeToo’d over Facebook, effectively…
You definitely can, dude. Because they don’t NEED proof. Their word against yours is enough.
Jussayin’.
Devil's advocate: On the computer tech employee only social media app, Blind, Microsoft employees are by far the least woke and troll san fransisco tech employees.