4
AwakeAndAlone 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exceptions to rules don't make what one says about the group any different. The average IQ is 100. Some guy has an IQ of 140. So what? The average IQ is still 100.

7
AwakeAndAlone 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think the "gay" is less damaging than the fact that men have to now include gays and women or be a bigot. I've been in male-only groups and the way in which women react when they hear about male-only groups is extremely belligerent, aggressive and combative. Women want to destroy these groups. I grew up playing sports and every guy joked about other guys being gay but it was all jokes and no one took it seriously. The "gay" didn't destroy the men's-only groups. The women truly destroyed these groups. Women specifically targeted these men-only groups and still do to this day because feminists know if men had an opportunity to congregate as men-only that poses a threat to women. Governments latched onto this because men are easier to control when they're not congregating with other men but are forced to congregate with women. By controlling the women then the government controls the men and the government doesn't have to fear any resistance because the men don't congregate with men anymore thanks to women destroying it. The fag thing you describe sounds nice as a rationale and in some regards, it's humiliating and adds insult to injury but the brunt of the damage was caused by women. Men can get over the gay thing and not give a shit because that's what men do. Women change everything though and their presence makes it difficult for men to be men anymore.

6
AwakeAndAlone 6 points ago +6 / -0

Correction: omg, that 45yo Managing Director is so hot, I hope he noticed my breasts. I exposed them today specifically for him. I even stuffed my bra a little. I hope those botox injections make me look even more attractive to him. I wish he'd just grab me and throw me under the table to suck his dick. I'd fuck her non-stop. Maybe I could wear a little less and get away with it... OMG WHAT'S THAT INTERN DOING STARING AT ME?!?!?! RAPE RAPE RAPE RAPE

10
AwakeAndAlone 10 points ago +10 / -0

The egalitarians would never allow this because then you'd easily be able to compare men to women and they wouldn't like the results.

Just like how they want to eliminate all unvaccinated people to get rid of the control group so people can't tell the difference between unvaccinated and vaccinated. The egalitarians don't want us to have the data to prove the difference between men and women or whites and non-whites in the workplace.

They used systematic oppression for the longest time to handwave away differences and people fell for this trick but people would be less inclined to fall for that trick now.

9
AwakeAndAlone 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's not even physically intensive jobs either but mentally intensive jobs. Every guy I know in Investment Banking that isn't brainwashed by the State's propaganda hates women in the finance industry because women in finance cause men's workload to go up. The companies consider women "equal" to men so they hire the same number of workers and in jobs where you were already working 80 hours a week, this is disastrous. The women DO NOT actually work as hard as the men. The MDs/Directors/VPs all roll out the red carpet for the women and they get away with so much. The men, especially the white men, are expected to pickup the slack and the men don't get any additional recognition. The women get fast tracked into management and higher positions. The only perk for men is that the women are always huge sluts and the guys get to fuck them but the guys have to work more in the end for it. I don't think it's a great trade-off tbh. I'd rather just fuck sluts with my off-time, which I'd get more of with less women in the office.

I know an IB shop in-town that had the majority of the team quit because it was already a lean shop when the bank decided to go all woke. When they went all woke, the workload for the remaining white guys shot up immensely and they weren't paid any more for it. The expectations just went up. The bank mandated 30% of new hires had to be women, with most of the 100% of new hires being at least POCs if not women. The city is 70% white and one of the guys who worked there told me for their summer intern positions, of the 9 candidates they were interviewing that were picked by HR, 7 of them were black, 1 was white and 1 was asian. My friend asked HR what was going on with regard to the candidate pool's race and the HR Manager said it was "their most diverse recruitment ever". My friend told the HR Manager that there was nothing diverse about 7/9 black people.

The working world is changing and not for the best. It is significantly worse for everyone now.

6
AwakeAndAlone 6 points ago +6 / -0

I've rarely seen work relationships workout. What I do see is a lot of marriages failing due to cheating with coworkers though.

Better to meet women at church, friends-of-friends and friends of the family.

2
AwakeAndAlone 2 points ago +2 / -0

I kind of left it vague in hopes people would research into it, thanks though.

25
AwakeAndAlone 25 points ago +25 / -0

We are debating whether it exists or not because a good amount of people in society don't have children in school right now. My mother, who has always been a good proxy for the average Canadian, told me she watched some clip on CNN about how some people were upset that their kids were being taught CRT but that the school doesn't have a single course on CRT and wasn't actually teaching it. This of course was a lie and I had to explain it to her. She was skeptical and said "well maybe that's actually going on". She doesn't believe it because her TV set, that is controlled by the left, hasn't told her it's going on.

Even the people with kids in school don't understand the extent of what's going on. I spoke to someone with teenagers about CRT and they're convinced their kids school isn't teaching it but there are "some questionable things" their kids are being taught. They just don't think it's that alarming.

Most parents don't have the time to fully understand what their kids are being taught. For one, the parents aren't sitting there in all the classes listening to everything and it's not like the kids come home and tell their parents everything. Once a child has been indoctrinated they'll start to see their parents, with more conservative values, as actually being "the enemy" so they'll keep things they know their parents wouldn't like from their parents, which is all by design.

If you think CRT is bad wait until you learn about SEL, which is basically CRT but exploiting children's emotional vulnerabilities to force CRT onto them. It combines CRT with Psychological Manipulation to streamline CRT's adoption in the school system. It's even worse than what's going on now and it's coming to schools soon with some already teaching it. It literally does teach children to see their parents as negative influences (if their parents don't adhere to CRT's values).

This is all being orchestrated by design. Force women into the workforce so that parents feel they need to have dual-income to support children. Then the State gains full control of the children through their indoctrination facilities. The teachers who are nothing more than pawns for the State were indoctrinated themselves into the system and thus the system repeats itself.

There is no solution through the system itself. Only home-schooling or the total destruction of the current system through a revolution can defeat this.