It's a britbongistan singer, has topped the charts over there, and hit top ten in the US a couple of times but America has enough dumb bitches already so she just blends in with all the other trash music.
If your idea prompt was somehow bigger than this bloated "summary" you must be wasting tokens horribly
Never means never, you can't relax.
Just don't film them at all. Don't even have them in the same stadium. Maybe just scrap the female events entirely.
Y'know you'd probably get your point across quicker if you just gave us the prompt and let us imagine it without all the padding.
When the only consequence you're not protected from is judgement by other women, your decisions start being shaped by other women's delusions more than reality.
Look at that look they share when the prospect of not being protected anymore is on the table "Truce? I can't say it unless I know you won't use it against me"
And he's already been released without charges, so there's a good chance they literally just grabbed the nearest white guy they could find to scapegoat for the headlines, despite having nothing substantive on him.
I'm going out on a sturdy and heavily statistically supported limb and put my money on a psychotic troon did it. They called it "a white british national", ain't no way they avoided saying male by accident.
Of course psychotic troons are also incredibly easily influenced into extreme acts, so those two culprits are by no means mutually exclusive.
If she's both a woman judge society should only trust her judgement about as far as anyone could throw her. And just look at the size of those two traitors.
Opinions are generally useless and ones on non-trivial societal matters are largely inculcated by cultural consensus or derived directly from moral frameworks. Too much diversity there just means you're no longer culturally homogenous and are therefore weaker.
But diversity of new ideas is always important to growing stronger and wiser. And I say specifically new ideas because you're supposed to weigh them up and test them with rigor. Then eventually you can pick the one that performs best and commit to it over the other current options, instead of hand wringing forever or flip-flopping constantly.
Barely know the guy but if he is a closet leftist, he is deep undercover
On the one hand it does lend credence to their claim to actually be young, because anyone old enough to remember it would recognize that as radioactive reddit-tier cringe. And going through a "they just haven't heard it yet" phase is practically a rite of passage of secular anti-authoritarianism.
But on the other hand, it's incredibly counter productive. Because the believers have in fact heard it before, and any form of serious right coalition that hopes to have the numbers to do anything practical will have to involve an alliance of traditional believers and a-religious people who nonetheless still strongly believe in Christian adjacent moral values and traditions. You can't fracture along those lines without losing disgustingly, for either side. For the traditional Christians that's an easier pill to swallow nowadays, since half the organized churches are soddomy promoting, abortion loving heretics. So even an atheist can seem more like a brother to the actual moral teachings of the bible in comparison, even if they're reaching the conclusion by different means. The firebrand, secular anti-authoritarians just need to look around at all the forces arrayed against them and ask themselves if they really should be sparing any energy to argue with people with the same practical end goals but might occasionally just ask if you want to be saved spiritually. Instead of devoting all your energy to fighting the people who actually just want you dead and your children despoiled and mutilated.
I just struggle to believe anyone can be truly motivated without it leading to any action, even if that action is just constantly trying to plan a way out.
Hence fighting for the right outcome is the only proof of belief in the principles I actually put stock in. And why I felt zero surprise when the Dali Lama turned out be telling little boys to suck his tongue behind closed doors.
If you have confidence in your judgement and your own moral character
That's the best you can get. You don't get to know. You rarely know the definitive outcome most important life choices before you have to make them. You don't know your business will succeed before you start it. You don't know that changing careers after your field starts shrinking and dying will work out better. You don't know the woman you choose to have kids with won't turn into a raging psycho when the menopause hits. The best you can do is be smart, be self-critical and take a stab with the best possible info you can have.
Either you chose to do your best regardless, or you choose to rot in hopeless mediocrity.
Outcomes are the principles, if you truly held those principles then you would want whatever leads to supporting best them in the long run. So I guess "outcomes first", but only in so much as I think "principles first" doesn't exist and is just LARPing.
For example I find lying for personal gain abhorrent, but if I had to put on some bullshit to trap a fraudster in their own BS, I'll do it and I'd have no issue with anyone else doing it either. One or two lies to get rid of a serial parasitic liar are a net good, and fuck anyone who says it isn't worth it.
If you have confidence in your judgement and your own moral character, then do what you believe is right instead of fearing what you're told is wrong. If you know yourself and know even a quick glance at the abyss might turn you into a monster, then maybe hold back and just try not to stand in the way of better men.
They still just told me almost the entire plot of the movie though. The lack of clumsy exposition dialogue is refreshing, and I guess for an action flick the plot isn't that important, but I'd still prefer trailers not to give everything away like that.
You could also get in trouble just for being here too. Remember; be a canuck, not a cacuck, invest in online security measures.
Later it becomes fused with pure commie rhetoric about abolishing private property and the need for the proletariat to unite. Amusingly this leads to him fusing "class consciousness" and "bros before hoes" into "biological consciousness" which is just such a silly name.
The first 10 pages are pure "women are naturally hypergamous hoes, letting them do this this is bad for civilization". The press are both largely too lazy to read it all, and fully expect that all of the general public will just skim the intro too.
Damn, even the pirate scanlation site has deleted the chapters and banned the translation group.
My first instinct is to blame trooner behavior. But since the site is technically a criminal enterprise, statistically it is much more likely than usual that some of their admin team is over-melanated.
There's like 15 seconds at 7:40. Albeit it's all smash cuts and very generic
That's a whole lot of time showcasing the style. But if the substance is at best unsubstantiated after 16 minutes, I have concerns.
He's been paying back all the times he beat the odds there ever since
"You'll go to jail (but only if you make more than $25 million in contracts, you'll get fined $5000 and spend only up to twelve months in jail)"
Oh yeah, that'll deter people and totally isn't gameable.
This is without a doubt the most Gen Z targeted movie I've seen in a while. The generational housing stats, the only semi-ironic fur suits, Kick colors not Twitch colors.
They missed a trick though, if they really wanted to get Gen Z's attention, rather than stealing the title of a Netflix documentary, they should have called it "How to rob a
bankjew", being okay with that is a political universal in Gen Z.