If we're going pure game theory here, and you assume the lower fertility rate is intrinsic to women's lib style societies, the only way they can compete and survive is to make survival rates inversely disproportionate for the countries with lower female education and higher fertility rates. Aka, you must constantly cull the savages to claim land and resources for your enlightened nation.
Who thinks anyone can sell hardcore ultra-imperialism to feminists before they choose oblivion?
Aka, you must constantly cull the savages to claim land and resources for your enlightened nation.
This is funny because the more men are suppressed to elevate women through their ridiculous equity measures, the less capable men become at fighting wars for women.
The gynocentric society intent on suppressing masculinity to keep women superior is the same society that will get steamrolled by the tribal savages in a traditional war... unless they opt for viral eugenics or nuking those nations from orbit.
men are suppressed... opt for viral eugenics or nuking those nations from orbit.
Not necessarily. We're moving to a "tournament" form of sex selection thanks to female hypergamy, which is what happens when women are in charge. Not all masculinity is suppressed - a continuous shit test is in effect, and the most extreme and ridiculous expressions of masculinity that pass the test are permitted. Women accept conquerors, while disqualifying "weak" men. This could include foreign invaders or the dumb but virulent local competitors. This means either the savages win or the strongest men from our own tribe will win. Either way an equilibrium will eventually be achieved, after which the "strong men" who create good times will reform society without as many rights for women, correcting the imbalance.
Or even maintaining civilizational competence. Incompetent yes men -empower- bureaucracies and HR, which allows their incompetence to slide under the deluge of women bullshit and feminization, feeding into itself and potentially firm collapse.
Not doing this culling is what killed Rhodesia. As it stands in the U.S., it takes two white or asian people to balance out the average net negative for a single black, and three whites or asians to counterbalance two hispanics. Doing some simple math and using the current demographics, right now only about 10% of the population is actually able to push the economy forward.
If we're going pure game theory here, and you assume the lower fertility rate is intrinsic to women's lib style societies, the only way they can compete and survive is to make survival rates inversely disproportionate for the countries with lower female education and higher fertility rates. Aka, you must constantly cull the savages to claim land and resources for your enlightened nation.
Who thinks anyone can sell hardcore ultra-imperialism to feminists before they choose oblivion?
This is funny because the more men are suppressed to elevate women through their ridiculous equity measures, the less capable men become at fighting wars for women.
The gynocentric society intent on suppressing masculinity to keep women superior is the same society that will get steamrolled by the tribal savages in a traditional war... unless they opt for viral eugenics or nuking those nations from orbit.
Not necessarily. We're moving to a "tournament" form of sex selection thanks to female hypergamy, which is what happens when women are in charge. Not all masculinity is suppressed - a continuous shit test is in effect, and the most extreme and ridiculous expressions of masculinity that pass the test are permitted. Women accept conquerors, while disqualifying "weak" men. This could include foreign invaders or the dumb but virulent local competitors. This means either the savages win or the strongest men from our own tribe will win. Either way an equilibrium will eventually be achieved, after which the "strong men" who create good times will reform society without as many rights for women, correcting the imbalance.
Already happening, look at Eurabia.
Or even maintaining civilizational competence. Incompetent yes men -empower- bureaucracies and HR, which allows their incompetence to slide under the deluge of women bullshit and feminization, feeding into itself and potentially firm collapse.
It’s a fun thought experiment, but not a bet I’d take. Feminists don’t care about the future. If they did, they’d have more children.
Not doing this culling is what killed Rhodesia. As it stands in the U.S., it takes two white or asian people to balance out the average net negative for a single black, and three whites or asians to counterbalance two hispanics. Doing some simple math and using the current demographics, right now only about 10% of the population is actually able to push the economy forward.