In fact, https://x.com/estama2/status/1942946168910086512.
BeamNG is a member of @videogames_EU. VGE didn't ask BeamNG concerning their response to https://stopkillinggames.com. As far i know there wasn't a vote on this too. We do NOT agree with their statement, this is not how a representative group should be behaving.
Your own personal beliefs
The state's preferred beliefs that is. I was just thinking about that the other day. This is actually always going to be the eventual outcome of "anti-discrimination", "civil rights", "forced secularism", or any law that removes freedom of association. It will always end up killing traditional moral structures and replacing them with state enforced structures that shift with cultural trends. It is a core failure of liberalism. (and the preferred goal of communism)
Yo I heard you like memes of reactions to memes so I put a meme of a reaction stream to a video in your meme reaction meme.
Remote Viewing? Besides wasting money I don't know that that program had any concrete negative consequences, whereas MK Ultra absolutely did. The unabomber for one. Also a documented case of a secretly drugged agent jumping out a window to his death. Ford pardoned the perpetrators of that one.
Haven't seen that confirmed but that is usually how it works. An update will come down on steam and unless you have updates turned off you'll get the new censored assets. Honestly one area I wish StopKiliingGames would look at, but they didn't want to bite off more than they can chew.
want the government to have more control over games
Sure, any amount of new laws is technically the government having more control over something. I have no qualms admitting there are unanswered questions and this could explode into an EU bureaucratic nightmare, but what SKG is asking for is quite simple. Game developers that sell games with online dependencies must create a plan for twilighting the game ahead of time, so the product you bought continues to function in some reasonable way at end of support. From a technical standpoint, this is easily accomplished because developers will typically have pre-integration test builds anyway, using placeholders instead of AWS or fancy clustering databases. Licensing of third party components (game libraries) and content (music) is probably the biggest hurdle. The proposal does not ask for retroactive changes either and would only apply to new games created after the law goes into effect.
Companies are trying to stop this.
Companies would be fine with the government having control over games if they thought it benefited them in some way. Regulations typically benefit big corporations after all.
Void released a tone-deaf follow-up "clarification" that only made things worse, because it simply says that "Yes we censored these things on PC, here's some photos to prove it. We really had no choice. No we don't care what you think. Have a nice day!"
in the hands of the next blackmail gathering op... nobody else would have ever released it either so it's not worse than any alternatives
No, if that's what's happening here, this is far worse. Should be obvious why.
some meaningful FBI reform
Best I can give you is a shiny new building.
No no, he's saving Israel for last. ;)
Seriously though, I still want to believe there is some kind of secret infiltration op going and that's why they've suddenly gone dark on this. Throw the enemy off until the last minute and then you pounce and bring everyone down at the same time. This is not only from me liking Trump, but from actions of the other players involved too. For example Bongino's recent statements before this been that there's a lot more going on than we know, and we can't talk about it yet. Also she's probably just another influencer who heard what she wanted to hear from an "inside source", but Megyn Kelly did this weird segment last year where she said "We're not done with Jeffrey Epstein... We're going to hear a lot more about Jeffrey Epstein in the coming year - and you may be hearing from him 'directly' - more on that as I'm allowed to tell you."
Wtf does that mean???
But I don't really believe all that, any more than I believe in UFO/UAP conspiracies. I'm not holding my breath or anything, and I'm not going to try to convince anyone IT'S HAPPENING. Whatever. He's got 3 years. Happy to see Trump's fans ain't having it either and aren't going to let it go. This time we won't accept any "well he tried but the swamp was too deep" or "he made bad picks" excuses.
Personally invested source, opinion discarded. Though I can imagine some old boomers out there being persuaded by Ken's argument. Despite that fact that his entire image has been crafted by PBS and livelihood depends on it existing, you know there's got to be somebody reading that and thinking "He's so knowledgeable and reasoned. Love his documentaries. We need to listen to experts like him."
In reality - assuming we're going to pretend we don't all get our news from our phones now anyway - most rural areas do get lots of TV stations, especially since the switch to digital. If a community thinks they need another broadcast TV station, they can fund their own public channel like many cities do. If the city is like 10 people and can't afford it, what about the county? What about the state? Why would this have ever been the federal government's job, in any generation?
men are suppressed... opt for viral eugenics or nuking those nations from orbit.
Not necessarily. We're moving to a "tournament" form of sex selection thanks to female hypergamy, which is what happens when women are in charge. Not all masculinity is suppressed - a continuous shit test is in effect, and the most extreme and ridiculous expressions of masculinity that pass the test are permitted. Women accept conquerors, while disqualifying "weak" men. This could include foreign invaders or the dumb but virulent local competitors. This means either the savages win or the strongest men from our own tribe will win. Either way an equilibrium will eventually be achieved, after which the "strong men" who create good times will reform society without as many rights for women, correcting the imbalance.
Concentrating all the angry refugees in one place not so far away doesn't seem like the best idea for Israel. They'd probably rather spread them around the world, in small numbers here and there. A diaspora, if you will.