Shit that is scary how good ai has become in a short period. If it wasn’t so over the top could you even tell it was ai? I watched on my phone so it was too small to see any small details that would indicate ai, but it doesn’t matter because in a year it will be impossible to tell.
The tranny problem already gave us a glimpse. Where guys look at random women and "clock" completely random things to say "totes a man." Catching an imperfection is a sign of the failure, and actual perfect emulation is obviously the most fake of all.
So it will just end up where literally nothing is trusted to be real by some people, and where others simply give up trying to differentiate and just go along with whatever.
The quickest way to change culture is by the use of Force. China did it twice with two Maoist revolutions. Everyone who didn't immediately change their culture was literally killed. It worked really well and it was really fast; practically overnight. Twice!
That said, it isn't sustainable. Look at Cambodia, the USSR or China. Reality had nothing to do with their politics and responses to real situations, and their entire countries imploded after just a few generations.
At some point being able to know the world as it is and empowering people to act accordingly is beneficial to the entire of society. It helps society as a whole to have sophisticated, meaningful, ethical culture at the individual, family and town level. The long term differences to productivity and national wealth are something on the order of 40% year on year. Superior culture and a willingness to embrace the truth of the world was why the British Empire, then the USA were able to dominate. They simply had more wealth to spend on force, and a code of ethics (baked into the culture) that let them use it relatively well, comparatively.
The UK and the USA turning their back on that culture has lead almost immediately to their downfall.
I don't know how you build things back. It is a lot easier to destroy a culture than it is to build a positive, ethical, effective culture; but it is the single biggest difference in the long economic outlook of a population.
The quickest way to change culture is by the use of Force. China did it twice with two Maoist revolutions. Everyone who didn't immediately change their culture was literally killed. It worked really well and it was really fast; practically overnight. Twice!
Exactly, a brilliant example of theory in action.
That said, it isn't sustainable. Look at Cambodia, the USSR or China. Reality had nothing to do with their politics and responses to real situations, and their entire countries imploded after just a few generations.
Due to outside influences. more force could have settled all internal problems.
At some point being able to know the world as it is and empowering people to act accordingly is beneficial to the entire of society. It helps society as a whole to have sophisticated, meaningful, ethical culture at the individual, family and town level.
You can't have an ethical culture and female freedom, you have to choose one or the other. Women will be evil in almost all circumstances if given freedom and autonomy.
OCP Grey did a really good video that summarize a book called something like the Seven Keys to Power or whatever. It is a comprehensive look at how there is a very stable state of society as a third world dictatorship. Peasants work hard and starve, well armed warlords take anything they want. This can continue indefinitely. This isn't in dispute.
However if any of their neighbors manage to get their shit together, they can, after a couple generations, earn more per year than the rest of entire region put together. At that point external influence can upset local, stable apple carts. Just like external forces dod with Cambodia, etc.
So I do take your point that it is entirely possible to use force to dismantle a highly productive, rich culture and replace it with a very stable, third world shithole and keep it that way forever.
I also agree with you about women's freedom. My counter would be that it is unethical to give women the freedom that they crave. They should be and should remain a protected class, just like children. Some of women can handle responsibility, but so can some twelve year old kids.
Unfortunately there is a tremendous biological drive in men to make women happy. Giving them what they want isn't the same thing as giving women what they need. It isn't ethical to let a four year old eat candy for every meal, and it isn't ethical to give a single woman the vote. When she is married she doesn't need the vote. One vote per family (they can discuss it) is enough.
Especially the incoming generation beta. Gen Alpha being doomed is already a pervasive thing to talk about, and I can't imagine that Gen Beta will be that much better short of something dramatic.
There was a movie I turned on that was about exactly this. I forget what streaming service it was on, but it was called Mountainhead. About 4 billionaire CEOs trying to work out a business deal for using AI to figure out what’s AI propaganda because the whole world is starting to kill each other based on fake AI videos.
Nitter.
Also, my mom showed me this. GIGABASED.
Shit that is scary how good ai has become in a short period. If it wasn’t so over the top could you even tell it was ai? I watched on my phone so it was too small to see any small details that would indicate ai, but it doesn’t matter because in a year it will be impossible to tell.
I worry about the future and our ability to differentiate what is reality and what is wholesale fabrication and tailor made propaganda.
The tranny problem already gave us a glimpse. Where guys look at random women and "clock" completely random things to say "totes a man." Catching an imperfection is a sign of the failure, and actual perfect emulation is obviously the most fake of all.
So it will just end up where literally nothing is trusted to be real by some people, and where others simply give up trying to differentiate and just go along with whatever.
Truth has never mattered more than force anyway
Look, you are not wrong, but...
The quickest way to change culture is by the use of Force. China did it twice with two Maoist revolutions. Everyone who didn't immediately change their culture was literally killed. It worked really well and it was really fast; practically overnight. Twice!
That said, it isn't sustainable. Look at Cambodia, the USSR or China. Reality had nothing to do with their politics and responses to real situations, and their entire countries imploded after just a few generations.
At some point being able to know the world as it is and empowering people to act accordingly is beneficial to the entire of society. It helps society as a whole to have sophisticated, meaningful, ethical culture at the individual, family and town level. The long term differences to productivity and national wealth are something on the order of 40% year on year. Superior culture and a willingness to embrace the truth of the world was why the British Empire, then the USA were able to dominate. They simply had more wealth to spend on force, and a code of ethics (baked into the culture) that let them use it relatively well, comparatively.
The UK and the USA turning their back on that culture has lead almost immediately to their downfall.
I don't know how you build things back. It is a lot easier to destroy a culture than it is to build a positive, ethical, effective culture; but it is the single biggest difference in the long economic outlook of a population.
Exactly, a brilliant example of theory in action.
Due to outside influences. more force could have settled all internal problems.
You can't have an ethical culture and female freedom, you have to choose one or the other. Women will be evil in almost all circumstances if given freedom and autonomy.
I agree with all of your points.
OCP Grey did a really good video that summarize a book called something like the Seven Keys to Power or whatever. It is a comprehensive look at how there is a very stable state of society as a third world dictatorship. Peasants work hard and starve, well armed warlords take anything they want. This can continue indefinitely. This isn't in dispute.
However if any of their neighbors manage to get their shit together, they can, after a couple generations, earn more per year than the rest of entire region put together. At that point external influence can upset local, stable apple carts. Just like external forces dod with Cambodia, etc.
So I do take your point that it is entirely possible to use force to dismantle a highly productive, rich culture and replace it with a very stable, third world shithole and keep it that way forever.
I also agree with you about women's freedom. My counter would be that it is unethical to give women the freedom that they crave. They should be and should remain a protected class, just like children. Some of women can handle responsibility, but so can some twelve year old kids.
Unfortunately there is a tremendous biological drive in men to make women happy. Giving them what they want isn't the same thing as giving women what they need. It isn't ethical to let a four year old eat candy for every meal, and it isn't ethical to give a single woman the vote. When she is married she doesn't need the vote. One vote per family (they can discuss it) is enough.
Especially the incoming generation beta. Gen Alpha being doomed is already a pervasive thing to talk about, and I can't imagine that Gen Beta will be that much better short of something dramatic.
There was a movie I turned on that was about exactly this. I forget what streaming service it was on, but it was called Mountainhead. About 4 billionaire CEOs trying to work out a business deal for using AI to figure out what’s AI propaganda because the whole world is starting to kill each other based on fake AI videos.
ehh, that's been a concenern for centuries.
You know its A.I because no journalist has the balls to actually say the obvious
I keep laughing at this like a 10yo laughs at fart jokes and the f word. I also like how that lady's mic flew away and came back. AI is beautiful.
That was one of the top 5 best uses of AI video I've ever seen
Does he have a rumble channel perhaps?
Zognald is a globalist scum pedo!
What da heck
I like how that tv producer had nearly the exact same voice as Ben Shapiro at around the 1:33 mark.
And the dude before that was Dave Portnoy, who's family was murdered in the Pizzacaust.
Shut it down!
POV: some idiot typed some things in a prompt great content!