Recently, I've been reading the trilogy of books by Bernard Cornwell about King Arthur. It's incredible how much history the British isle has, and how little I knew about old British paganist tradition, before the advent of Christianity.
I'd recommend them, if you have any interest in the subject.
Well, I can attest to being able to find mods for Diablo 2 with a search engine leading me to some forum discussions, where people were linking directly to them.
If your main interest is browsing a large database with a good UI, then sadly, the closest thing to the user friendliness of Nexus Mods that I've found is XIV Mod Archive, for Final Fantasy XIV alone. Otherwise, Nexus really is the best in the industry.
I'm assuming that the 2nd one you're referring to is Based Mods? Well, tbh, that was mostly the one I had in mind. I expect that if Stellar Blade ever came out on PC, then it would get its Nexus page for the vast majority of the mods. Some of them that focus on removing censorship will most likely be removed by them. Once that happens, someone will very likely repost them on Based Mods. I agree that navigating it isn't the best, but it's fine for the most part, simply because there are so few mods there to begin with. Basically only the ones that the woke sites won't host.
Other games, like FFXIV, are big enough that people created sites specialized for a single game. I don't expect that Stellar Blade will have that much appeal, but who knows. There are also a lot of modders who have their own patreon pages or their own sites, and there are also a lot of smaller site that can have mods you can find with a Brave search (or whatever search engine you use). But I personally haven't looked too deeply for alternatives, since all the games I play are covered by the options I stated above.
The fact that it's Biden's administration that wanted to alter it makes me very suspicious. It practically sounds like they wanted to turn it into something even far more abhorrent, and Texas is just desperately clinging onto the platter with less shit to swallow.
Because it's not a meme, it's a comic strip.
And the issue with leftist wall-of-text "memes" is that more than half is a set-up for the "joke" that consists of making the reader do mental gymnastics to try to parse the intentions and point of view of the creator. It's never just a simple observation of objective reality, it needs to first redefine reality, before attempting to poke fun at it. That's why they always fall flat.
They're gaining more ground because we concede it constantly. You're arguing in favour of this censorship here from Sony, because fighting against it would, in your opinion, make you look like a "sex-crazed maniac". Constantly conceding every little battle about censorship means that one day, it becomes too far gone, and you've lost all rights. It should be vocally and financially opposed at every turn, even in trite cases like this. It's the only way to maintain free speech and individual rights.
Blood splatter too.
But any censorship imposed by Sony is a step in the wrong direction. Let the studio create the game they want to create, and let the people decide whether or not it's for them, without unrelated executives' meddling.
I have no idea what the game is even about. Even if it were to come out on PC, it's unlikely that I would purchase it. But from what I can currently gather, it doesn't seem like the censorship was the decision of the studio. It seems like it was forced by Sony. I would be willing to extent an olive branch for that. It would encourage them to grow. Surely being forced to alter their product by executives left a sour note in the developers' mouths. If they were to branch out from under Sony's wings as a result, then I could only wish them well. But they would need funds to do so.
Besides, restoring the existing game files is an easy fix.
Honestly, it's never been clear to me what the original Japanese meant, since I've only read summaries written by other people and can't read the language. I like your interpretation far more than what I wrote above, and hope that's how they'll go about it. But like you said, changing the name of the "Shadow Sirens" isn't a good sign.
I deeply loved TTYD when it first came out, and it's one of my favourite games of all time. I would hate to start resenting aspects of it because of their involvement in degenerate leftist propaganda.
As far as I'm aware, the original Japanese game did seriously hint that Vivian was a man, as far as those shadows can have sexes. Large part of the reason why Beldam was constantly bashing her/him... it. So in an extremely unique case, it seems that if they turned it into a crossdressing man in the remake, it would actually be closer to the original than the game we originally got in English in North America. I'll agree that I would greatly dislike this change, because I prefer Vivian as a woman and especially because there will likely be a leftist troglodyte greatly altering all dialogues about this until the fact that it is a man is constantly bashed into our faces rather than merely slightly hinted at like it should be, but it would still seemingly be closer to the original Japanese game.
Do they call them "cp1", "cp2", "cp3", etc, or just "cp"? Because one makes it more obvious than the other.
Also, there is a difference between writing "cp" in the in-game chat where the context makes it obvious what you mean, compared to writing it in a tweet where many people won't know what you meant. Especially if the only contextual clue you give them about your abbreviation is that you specifically mention the subject is controversial.
When many different women all have similar stories it is safe to say there is something afoot. These have come from both the UK and in Romania.
So no names? Nothing specific?
Attacks from the Tateliban brothers are exclusively directed at the state of Israel, they also send millions in aid to Hamas and Hamas aligned groups in the region.
Where did you find the information about their finances and donations? Can it be verified? You're claiming they directly sent funds to Hamas. How do you know, when did it happen, and how much?
Stop talking in vague terms. Give me specific facts.
From what I last heard, none of the women who accused the Tate brothers ever worked for them. They were all just false accusations from people they often did not even know. Could you be more specific about their alleged crimes? I'd like to know if there's been something more concrete since then. Do you have any name for any of these multitudes of women that you claim made accusations against them?
Also, it should be noted that although Andrew Tate himself is now calling himself a muslim, his brother is very openly a Christian. I don't think it'd be accurate to just label him as just another mudslime, with all the associations that usually come from that label.
And also, why would attacking Israel be any worse than attacks against any other country? With the amount of funding, resources and support they've been handed in the past several decades, they should be able to take care of themselves. They've clearly been far more interested in waging war than in diplomacy with their neighbours, from what I can tell. This is the result.
When I was in College, I was in a class called "world views". It was a class in the domain of "humanities" or "philosophy", and it was mandatory to get credits in a few of them.
So in one of the earlier classes, the teacher paired us in groups, and gave us a list of short descriptions of people. There was a scientist, a doctor, a pregnant woman, a baby, etc, and you had to classify them in the order in which you would save them from a fire, assuming that they were all passed out and you could only carry one at once. So we talked, and we rated them in an order. After that, the teacher added some more details to the characters. The scientist was a smoker, the baby had a birth defect, the pregnant woman was an alcoholic, etc, and you had to order them again, and then compare the two lists and explain your decisions to the class.
So there was this one guy, in one of the groups. Apparently, he argued and pushed extremely hard for the smoker to be basically dead last in his group's list, because he smoked. He was saying that he was already on the verge of death, that saving him would be pointless, and that he deserved to die. Well, as soon as the class finished, his group was really surprised when they saw him pull out a pack of cigarettes, place one on his ear, and then walk out.
The point of the anecdote is to say that you don't necessarily need to live in a certain way to be able to recognize and preach a different lifestyle than your own. I know basically nothing about the person you mentioned, but it could be the case for her. For me, I'm an atheist, but that doesn't mean that I can't recognize how horrible of an effect atheism has had on society, or that I can't recognize how much better off the West was when they shared a common set of values in the form of Christianism. I wish I still lived in a nation like that, even if I personally can't get myself to believe that a god exists.
I don't get it.
Sure, it's that retarded 4/20 celebration that they've been calling "weed day" or something for a couple years now.
And from the comments, it sounds like Germany legalized weed on that very day.
But so what? Germany is losing all that made it once great, becoming a leftist shithole that is doomed to fall apart under the policies of the former proud communist Merkel, and her actions of sabotaging nearly all opposing political parties that could have righted the ship for decades.
So why should current Germany legalizing weed detract from the enjoyment of stoners? Germany is one of them, now. Anyone who still associates its current state and its current culture to Nazis, is an idiot.
Am I missing something?
Wouldn't even be hard. Just a can of brown spray paint, so that it looks like it shat itself.