7
horstshort 7 points ago +7 / -0

But they definitely have working nukes and somehow managed to never use them despite trains being their biggest natural predator.

2
horstshort 2 points ago +2 / -0

All of the first Christians were racial Jews. Jesus was a racial Jew. Paul was a racial Jew. Christianity was exported to Europe by these very Jews.

1
horstshort 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would there have a need to make 2 different religions?

Because racial differences are real and the driving factor behind everything. Christianity is tailored to Europeans. Islam to Arabs.

Furthermore, Islam teaches that all non-Islam (including jews) are enemies who should be destroyed.

Islam wants to convert the entire world just as Christianity does.

If the goal of jews is to use religions to make themselves above all others, that seems highly counter-productive.

No. Homogeneity is dangerous to Jews. That's why the promote diversity.

Come on lol, country of Israel is constantly at wars with everyone around them.

Who? Hezbollah? Hezbollah isn't a country. Hamas? Hamas isn't a country either and is part of their territory.

Syria hasn't fired a shot at Israel for half an entirety and now is controlled by an ISIS guy who bends over backwards for Israel. Neither Egypt nor Jordan have been hostile to Israel for ages. Lebanon is on the brink of a civil war because their government is more concerned with trying to neutralize Hezbollah on behalf of Israel than defending their people against Israel slaughtering them.

Saudi Arabia does Israels bidding, so does Qatar. UAE is doing everything in its power to please Israel. Yemen for the most part is controlled by Saudi Arabia. Turkey is one of Israels most important trade partners. Kuwait and Oman are pretty much irrelevant and both controlled by the US. Iraq is still pretty much incapable of doing shit.

So who is left? Iran. Literally the only nation that takes a stand against Israel.

What's the most likely scenario?

Christianity was developed as a theological weapon against the Roman empire.

Jews modified our history, because they have control over most if not all big institutions, to hide what our ancestors did to them.

The same Jews who came up with the holocaust? They would "hide" atrocities against them despite the fact that they're still whining about Rome kicking their asses two millennia ago?

You can't be serious.

Jews developed out of nowhere Christianism, creating a big division among themselves, with people up in arms because they made profits out of everything, and knowing they would have to, simultaneously, make it world-wide, but also always try to keep it under control

what

2
horstshort 2 points ago +2 / -0

If yids attack Christianity to drive the small number of 'anti-semites' back to this 'Judaism for gentiles', how do they ensure that they do not drive far larger numbers of Christians away from this Judaism for gentiles altogether by means of the same arguments?

Why would Christians be driven away from Christianity because of ridicule? Jehoves Witnesses and Mormons are being ridiculed in a far more extreme manner for ages now and their numbers aren't dwindling.

Yes, you contain and neuter anti-semites by shunting them into a false oppositional belief system, but they're so miniscule in number as to be irrelevant.

If actual anti-semites were irrelevant they wouldn't be fighting them so fanatically to neutralize their influence.

So some yids attack Christianity to drive anti-semites to it whilst other yids simultaneously promote Christianity (Pentecostal, dispensationalist versions of it) to create philo-semites?

Why do some Jews promote forever wars on behalf of Israel while others attack Israel fanatically because of it?

Because right-wing Jews drag European civilization into the war with the Arab world while left-wing Jews import the Arab "refugees" into European civilization by the millions.

Look at Norman Finkelstein. He has been fanatically rallying against Israel for decades. You might believe he is on the side of European civilization. And then he drops his mask and suddenly laments the fact that the right becomes "obsessed" with Israel.

https://x.com/KeithWoodsYT/status/2059026262539006088

Seems schizophrenic to me

Jews are quite literally schizophrenic.

Jews need antisemitism to force racial cohesion. Without racial cohesion Jews will truly assimilate into their host nations and disappear as a people. Antisemitism is the very foundation of Judaism. Without it it can't survive.

whilst others like Johnathan Cahn simultaneously [and counter-productively, insofar as this specific goal is concerned] promote Christianity in a way that will drive anti-semites far, far away from Christianity).

You have plenty of anti-semites on this very board who believe Christianity is the answer to the Jewish question. Despite the fact that Christianity has been the dominant religion in the European world for almost two millennia.

Jews aren't a hivemind. There's only one issue that they universally agree on and that is destroying (Amalek) European civilization.

2
horstshort 2 points ago +2 / -0

Consequently, if I was a follower of Adam Green, I would respond:

And you would be wrong. Adam argues that the Jews who attack Christianity are doing it to drive (anti-semitic) people back to Christianity as it is essentially Judaism for gentiles. Also the attacks on Christianity serve as a humiliation ritual.

2
horstshort 2 points ago +2 / -0

If it was even just a tiny bit remotely true that there is a world wide Jewish conspiracy then Jews would simply remain in the shadows and use their influence to keep control and prosper instead of openly and gleefully antagonizing everyone.

Islam would have been destroyed hundreds of years ago

Islam is Christianity for Arabs. Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all part of the same.

their neighbours behave and protects the country of Israel under any circumstance.

All of them do. The only exception is Hezbollah. Obviously Iran and the Houthis too but you can't really call them Israels neighbors. And their opposition to Israel isn't actually religious in nature.

The most likely reason behind this, is that he's a little smarter than the others, and just doing some reverse psychological trick. "Those antisemite guys always do the opposite of what we want, so I'll tell them to become Christian, so that they stray away from Jesus"

When Europe was staunchly Christian Judaism still wasn't persecuted like Pagans or heretical Christians were. The Church never tried to wipe out Judaism.

5
horstshort 5 points ago +5 / -0

I heard Foxx threw a hissy fit and that's why we got that stupid ending. Although I don't know if it is actually true.

1
horstshort 1 point ago +1 / -0

It served a good purpose. He's the main good guy and should be swimming in pussy but he needs to use hookers.

I refuse to believe you're a real person. Even a so called raging incel that worships Clavicular wouldn't make a statement this retarded.

9
horstshort 9 points ago +9 / -0

I thought it was one of the better scenes of the movie and even the girl I was watching the movie with agreed. She thought the girl was super cute.

You thought the brothel scene that dragged on for 6 minutes and served no purpose but to show tits was great and the girl you were watching the movie with agreed with it and thought the hooker was... cute?

Did a LLM write this "analysis"?

10
horstshort 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah, that one is actually a good movie. Could've been great if they didn't chicken out with the ending.

16
horstshort 16 points ago +16 / -0

So what did you like outside the political narrative about it?

The terrible and unnecessarily long sex scene with the Asian hooker with bolted on tits? The weirdly autistic 'there's mold' bit in the middle of it? Perhaps the disjointed time jumps? The terrible acting? The terrible pacing? The terrible cutting? The cringy backstory scenes about his absentee father? The retarded shootout scene with the police that was completely unnecessary from a story standpoint?

If you wanna suck the cock of the guy who made the movie Auschwitz and let's his movies get distributed by Jewish owned publishers, go ahead.

1
horstshort 1 point ago +1 / -0

My true thoughts? That I openly call myself an anti-Abrahamic ethno-nationalist? Shit, you got me.

12
horstshort 12 points ago +12 / -0

It's an Uwe Boll movie. He's a horrible director that makes money exclusively by gaming the system and stirring up controversy.

33
horstshort 33 points ago +33 / -0

To make a comparison. ((Sand-)Nigger) Muslims are an invasive species. They're a problem if you import them in the millions. They're not a problem if you leave them where they belong.

They're a symptom of the disease. Not the disease itself.

25
horstshort 25 points ago +25 / -0

They invented a tool for this and used it on the country's leaders in the past.

Actually that tool was only used to go on a murderous rampage against anyone that was perceived to be enemies of the new republic. So in this case it would be used to kill everyone that tries to change anything about the current situation.

2
horstshort 2 points ago +2 / -0

That being said..there is data in the undeveloped areas showing a general creep upward in averages.

There is data. Sure. What data though? We know that "scientists" really like to make the data fit their narrative.

3
horstshort 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a silly movie. Has been ages since I've seen it but from what I can remember it was fun. The game is already completely bonkers so Uwe Boll couldn't really fuck it up.

2
horstshort 2 points ago +2 / -0

Postal was fine too. Never watched Rampage.

11
horstshort 11 points ago +11 / -0

That's complete bullshit. Hot summers are nothing unusual. The only thing that changed is climate hysteria and measuring temperatures in the middle of the concrete jungle to fuel that hysteria. Or pretending that clogged up drains, insufficient sewers, neglecting flood protections and building houses in the flood zones of a river has nothing to do with so called "record floods".

2
horstshort 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, the rabbi advocates for ethno-nationalism that makes foreign subversion impossible. That's why he and his useful Christian idiots advocate for the exact opposite all over the world except of course Israel.

8
horstshort 8 points ago +8 / -0

His directing is like Hitler's painting.

No. Just no.

view more: Next ›