4
Mpetey123 4 points ago +4 / -0

He's talking about Phoebe Waller-Bridge. I wouldn't call her unattractive but she's not hot

4
Mpetey123 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wonder if the Bud Light and Jaguar blowback caused some companies to slow roll the faggy this year? Plus with Trump winning it gave them cover to not go in as deep this year.

2
Mpetey123 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree 4 felt like a bad movie and felt like a middle finger to the Fandom

2
Mpetey123 2 points ago +2 / -0

You got a point. Glenn Powell is probably a guy that could do it. Henry Cavill or Aaron Taylor Johnson aren't twinkees.

3
Mpetey123 3 points ago +3 / -0

Especially since it's partially inspired by pulp comics. Who cares if it's formulaic, people like the flavor. Just think of a Macguffin and have a charming fedora man get it

I look at something like Uncharted and wonder how Naughty Dog isn't making sequel after sequel.

1
Mpetey123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did anyone read the article? I'm wondering what her point is? Is she just looking for a date?

2
Mpetey123 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jennifer Connelly.....ahhhhh moon eyes

❤️❤️❤️

2
Mpetey123 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here we play Russian Roulette with six bullets and we reload after every shot

2
Mpetey123 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well probably not. It's the 8th Star Trek movie. So if you haven't seen the other movies, probably not worth your time.

But I bring it up because of the Prime Directive. A lot of non-Trekkers know about the Prime Directive. It basically states post warp societies can't interact with pre-warp societies because you could interfere with a societies' natural evolution.

In Insurrection they find a planet that has an atmosphere that can regenerate and prolong life. A fountain of youth. On the planet is a small group of people who weren't indigenous to the planet but crashed landed there.

The federation discovers the planet and wants to farm the atmosphere but first have to remove the people. An android, Data, is part of the mission. His job was to help in the covert removal and transport of the population, but his program pulls a HAL and he sabotages the mission.

Anyways my point is as the villain of the movie says. Nothing they are doing violates the Prime Directive. The expansive use of the word genocide, when it isn't made me think of the mustache twirling villain using the words of the Federation aganist them.

Anyways I'm retarded

7
Mpetey123 7 points ago +7 / -0

And besides being bigger, she's also 42. She ain't birthin you no babies. And if somehow you do miraculously knock her up you are playing Russian Roulette with the chromosome count of the offspring.

2
Mpetey123 2 points ago +2 / -0

Look how much of a fan you are, you instinctively liked his writing

1
Mpetey123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Genocide is one of those words with the elasticity of something very stretchy.

2
Mpetey123 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Candy himself wrote the script for that one

3
Mpetey123 3 points ago +3 / -0

Would you care to elaborate? I know Kane is mostly based on Hearst, who wasn't Jewish. And Orson Welles wasn't a jew. I'm asking just for my own edification

7
Mpetey123 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's a very charming movie. I particularly enjoy the car rental scene and the scene with the couple warning them about driving the wrong way.

"They keep yelling we're driving the wrong way."

"Ah what do they know they don't even know where we are going?"

"Ohh good point."

14
Mpetey123 14 points ago +14 / -0

Has now become

So the 15th Century is "has now become"?

view more: Next ›