2
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Post Removed for: Rule 12 - Disinformation.

Not necessarily the topic on it's own, but in this case, this is AI slop. I can't confirm that this person exists, or is part of "TVNET".

I'm not going to sanction you on this, op. But you have to use extreme caution with AI tiktok bullshit.

2
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Intentional Falsehoods / Disinformation

Comment Approved: I don't think this is disinfo, more of just speculation.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Post Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

Post Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

Do not call reprisal killings "true justice"

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Do not assert the innate moral inferiority of races

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I literally tell you how long your banned for. The ban message even includes it if I forget.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Do not assert the moral inferiority of races.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Do not assert the moral inferiority of races.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

This is kind of also Rule 3, because it's a statement of moral inferiority of jews, but directed personally, so it's real violation is still Rule 16.

3
DomitiusOfMassilia 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why you do you hate your friends, tho?

1
DomitiusOfMassilia 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is absolutely not a healthy reaction to draw and quarter anyone. Even if we were to argue about a sense of justice and closure, that doesn't come from mutilation and torture. Just recently a criminal was given death by firing squad in Florida, and the police did not drink his blood, dismember his corpse, or bludgeon a family member with the body parts of the criminal. This is because we are not insane savages. His execution was the ending of his life and the recognition that he can no longer harm another person, and no amount of Leftist True Crime documentaries from the Innocence project will get him out.

Rejecting wrongdoing for the sake of punishing wrongdoing is the opposite of endorsing wrongdoing.

A healthy reaction would not to be rage baited, and to move on and make positive and affirmative steps to make the world a better place around you with a sense of love, discipline, and justice in your heart. None of that involves chopping people into pieces.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm going to be a bit of a faggot about this for now because of the amount of Rule 2 violations, and the number of people calling for violence all at once. Every once in a while there's a big push for rage-bait and calls for violence. Sometimes it seems like a concerted effort rather than a random effect. Considering that glow-fags are a thing, this is a line that needs to be maintained.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm not seeing him say Qataris are X. I'm seeing him say one person is a Qatari. Is he saying other's are Qataris and that Qataris are inferior? Is he saying that Qataris as an ethnic group are doing something?

If someone says "I think you're JIDF" that isn't in and of itself a violation of Rule 16. Government intelligence agencies are not a racial conspiracy. Saying something is a CIA operation isn't an attack on whites.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +7 / -6

Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Harassment

I don't think this merits harassment, it's a response to a comment. It may be mean, but a mean comment doesn't necessarily make it a bannable comment.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Racial moral claim

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech (x2)

Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

Do not advocate for making psycho-posting real life.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

Don't advocate for extrajudical punishments.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

That shows it has absolutely nothing to do with western legal history. So yeah, you're calling for extra-judicial killings. Otherwise, you are calling for the revolutionary up-ending of all western legal tradition.

2
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Calling someone a faggot is explicitly allowed, this is not an attack on an identity group. It doesn't seem to be an attack on Qataris as a nationality, just an attack on Telia.

2
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 2 points ago +6 / -4

Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

"Severe Consequences" does not explicitly denote violence.

view more: Next ›