I think Southern is under tenet media as is Abby libby
nobody said these thots were intelligent
Cause it was one of the outrage points conservative female influencers put out when it was found out he got a hooker pregnant and wanted it aborted.
I dont watch their show but they claimed he was going against his christian values
You really think they’ll jail an Israeli spy
Isn’t half of fresh and fit supposedly Christian anyway
I bet both won’t do that
So +1 to you is downvoted. Ok
I mean that’s you? I saw his point so I deleted it. Why do you expect people to behave exactly like you?
Why would I delete an overall +2 when I didn’t even delete the comments in the other thread that were negative 5 or more if I cared so much about imaginary internet points like you seem to?
Your idea is that somehow I care about imaginary points so much that I’ll delete an overall positive thread but leave my negatively rated comments up. At some point, you don’t make sense
So is that +5/-4 an upvoted thread or a downvoted one?
Here’s the post asking me to consolidate it instead of posting 2 so I did
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/17t1W198V8/x/c/4ZBI1MKIONE
Let’s think about the fact that it was maybe 10-20 mins apart and about the same subject. The latter topic has 60 upvotes , but you believe the first is so radically different it will get negative votes instead?
Dude the problem is you
It was upvoted. Just that someone suggested since the two posts were the same lolcow on the same twitter thread I should just post one so I deleted the earlier one
I thought the same thing when I saw the black girl in eiyuuden.
Also, I'm not sure how effective censoring the letter J in the word Jew is going to be at hiding the word Jew. Especially in the context of jew-media. What other letter is going to be even logical in that context
That's one scenario. I dont want to play a 1001 hypotheticals and argue them with you.
I could quite literally say if i didnt eat breakfast i would get hungry and no one could argue with me on that. I do not want to bother arguing with people on what if germany did this and what if that happened to germany because of that because there's no right answer because its a fucking vague hypothetical.
Although if you can't understand that, you cant visualise apples
Its war. A world war. I'm not going to cry cause japan got nuked in a world war after what they did. As a country they deserved it. Too bad about the civilians but considering they also killed countless civillians, that's just a reality of war
You dreamers can go lose the next world war if you think innocents wont end up being killed
I think without loss of life, the psychological damage to break them wouldnt have been enough
And how do you know the japanese would have surrendered unconditionally? There was a last minute coup attempt by people who didn't want to surrender and just wanted to keep going on.
I don't think it had to be those 2 cities had to be levelled. Could have been any other 2 cities in japan so on that point we agree.
And yes, it kinda goes back to my point about breaking their spirit
And many thousands weren't. They were killed by the japanese without a nuke. Nuking them to force an unconditional surrender and hopefully break their spirit was the best option
Its still better than the "thinkers" who come up with hypotheticals of everything. What if Germany was nuked back then, or America or Russia. Or every possible country that ever committed anything bad.
No, my argument is that Japan deserved nuking. Not that hypothetically America deserves nuking because I don't do hypotheticals. If Japan had the nukes at the time and America was behaving like Japan did at the time while Japan wasn't, then sure, maybe America should have gotten nuked
But I don't want to make dumb hypothetical arguments like that because a) japan didn't have the nukes and America wasn't behaving like japan. All I can tell you is that based on the situation in WW2, Japan deserved nuking and it turned out well
A lot of people are trying to translate that event into modern day politics which is retarded because the times were different, the scales of the atrocities being committed were diifferent. They think the argument that Japan should have been nuked back then is somehow an argument to nuke people now, like you and your idea that this is justifying the nuking of America/Germany/Russia. No, you fucking moron because we're not in the late stages of a WW3 where such actions may have to be taken
In ww2, cities were legitimate targets.In WW3, they will again BE legitimate targets.
Let me know when America starts running multiple comfort women brothels in multiple nations then come and tell me about how you deserve nukes. Or just mass killing people and putting them into graves in multiple fronts.
What is the point of your question? Whether countries deserved to be nuked when they're committing atrocities? Yeah, if you can get away with it. If you could nuke ISIS strongholds without any fallout, wtf wouldn't you.
Or are you trying to retrospectively try and justify nuking America, Germany and Russia? If so, then you're a fucking moron
So, as someone who was born in one of those countries that Japan invaded and whose family was there during the time of the invasion, Japan deserved the nukes. But I have no issues with people questioning it
They’re not doing this to just be a single mom. They’re doing this only to a certain type of men
He's a stranger to her. Shes not his woman
No. Questioned. Was typing on phone and i used an abbreviation
Expect lots of reeeeing