Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

63
Repeal the 19th (twitter.com)
posted 1 year ago by evilplushie 1 year ago by evilplushie +63 / -0
53 comments share
53 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (53)
sorted by:
▲ 56 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 56 points 1 year ago +56 / -0

she hates him because he speaks the truth

permalink save report block reply
▲ 50 ▼
– deleted 50 points 1 year ago +50 / -0
▲ 47 ▼
– current_horror 47 points 1 year ago +47 / -0

We’re supposed to believe that “childless cat ladies” offended this woman but “grab them by the pussy” didn’t? She was never voting for Trump.

The narrative that women are turned off by Vance en masse is an attempt to manufacture a consensus. They target women like this all the time.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 26 ▼
– evilplushie [S] 26 points 1 year ago +26 / -0

That's cause women are dumb enough to fall for this

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 30 ▼
– Grant_us_eyes 30 points 1 year ago +30 / -0

The best phrase I've ever heard to describe it is 'Hagmind'.

Women are stupidly collectivist when it comes to opinion. It's why you only hear 'Pickme' as an insult from women(and feminist men).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Trump won the White women vote twice and will probably do so again, despite the best efforts of posters here.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– censorthisss 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

She claims to be for small government but wanted Nikki Haley to be the VP pick LOL

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– nuggetpatrol 25 points 1 year ago +25 / -0

He's not wrong about the no stake in america line. If you have a kid, you're probably going to try and do your best for them, whatever that implies economically and how you can help them. And try and leave them a decent country to live in too.

But if you don't have to because of lack of child, there's no reason to want to do any of that. But there is still a need. Hence the cat lady insult.

There was a study done awhile back that said childless women will find something to latch that child ideal onto. Be it a pet, or a political cause, or something in their lives.

Which is why women will go insane if you talk abortion and how it actually works (federal versus state law) and that abortion is not illegal if it means you're going to be injured or die during birth, or that your child would.

Heck, some states (very few, but they exist) even allow you to abort if you do the test and find out the child might end up with some debilitating life long issue that drops their quality of life into the toilet, and becomes a huge financial drain on you.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– WhitePhoenix 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Dunno, I'm a MGTOW guy. Using the "cat lady" logic, since I'm not a fan of marriage because of how shitty it has become because of feminist groups fucking with our court system, people will make the assumption that I have no 'stake' in the system. I also think assuming women with kids automatically have a stake in the system isn't a correct view either. Do remember, even if there's fewer of them getting babies, leftist women have kids as well, do they have a stake in the system? Of course not - they still support left wing views that directly are detrimental to society. They're actively killing the system despite shitting out a kid.

If this lady is a cat lady, she should be asking herself if she doesn't want to have kids, what is she doing to help the Republican cause? It's not just sitting on the sidelines saying "Go Trump!", is she participating in her local school boards? Is she openly opposing far left policies in her workplace? If you're not a cat lady spinster then prove it, go do that shit that the rest of us are doing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– deleted 24 points 1 year ago +24 / -0
▲ 16 ▼
– evilplushie [S] 16 points 1 year ago +16 / -0

Except basement dwellers really offends no one, even the people they're said to because it's such a weak insult. Women do get offended at cat lady though

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BeefyBelisarius 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

There's also a strong possibility those spinsters are murderous hags with haunted wombs.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– covok48 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Well because single childless women are soon to be a majority of women in the Western World.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– I_Miss_Imp 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately a lot of times the women/families who can get pregnant easily are usually just as portrayed in Idiocracy and then the liberal brain rot ideals spread

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Dereliction 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

The cat lady trope stretches back literal centuries. This is why it wounds them so deeply still, and why "basement dweller" is more amusing than insult to most people.

permalink parent save report block reply
View 1 more comment
▲ 18 ▼
– JiggsawCalrissian 18 points 1 year ago +18 / -0

Don't underestimate how common this opinion will be

I hate her and think her policies are bad but shes woman so she has my vote

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Assassin47 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

All women are feminists.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– cccpneveragain 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

He's not wrong. I don't have children. While I do have young family members I'm close with and want to have a future, I still find myself occasionally dismissing issues as, "Why do I care I won't be around for that?" I tend to prefer men with strong families as candidates.

I can really only assume these that have such a sour attitude around families are jealous and surround themselves only with other cat ladies and bitch about how they hate children and such.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Totsugeki 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

That Skull & Bones Pajeet fucker disgusts me, too, and it's got nothing to do with cat ladies. Trump sucks at picking VPs, but I'll still vote for him.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– covok48 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

Go back to Reddit.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– LibertyPrimeWasRight 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

You understand that the no golden idols thing is worship, right? It’s not a prohibition on leaders in general.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– LibertyPrimeWasRight 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Do you think you’re posting on /The_Donald or something? I would say that the majority of people on this board think Trump has some big flaws but is still better than anyone the Democrats put up. Is that a position with which you disagree?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Assassin47 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

organically attack the system.

What would that look like?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Justalurker69420 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Ah yes, the "based conservative woman," who drops all pretense at the drop of a hat. The hat being "anything that makes me uncomfortable."

Women cannot be your political ally, no matter what "based" thing they are known for, because they will default to prevailing social opinion every time the rubber hits the road.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Vebent 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

There is a lot of truth in what Vance says. Anyone that doesn't have kids only have themselves to worry about. They can milk everyone for all they're worth and then leave nothing behind when they die. Someone with kids needs to insure that everything is set for their future. Home, education, and basic necessities.

If you don't want kids then that's all fine, but stop trying to get everyone else to follow in your footsteps by believing having kids is the end of the world and a curse.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Gizortnik 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Childless cat lady infuriated that she was identified as a childless cat lady.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– LibertyPrimeWasRight 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

“I don’t like any of the consequential actions that this group is taking, and the other group doesn’t take those actions… but they do say mean things!”

Wow, what a tough choice.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– JustHereForTheSalmon 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

She even admits it isn't intellectual but a "primal hatred and disgust".

The fact that her vote counts for anything more important than iceburg vs romaine is a modern tragedy.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– acp_k2win 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

We are well past the discussion about whether women should be allowed to vote and need to start seriously talking about whether or not it should be legal to teach a woman how to read.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– acp_k2win 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

normies go into reflexive attack mode to distance themselves from anything too far outside of overton... but we are making progress, a few years ago the idea that women shouldn't vote was treated the same way

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– covok48 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Yes, fellow woman.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Smith1980 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

She is honestly going to not vote for Trump over that? Wow.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– deleted 22 points 1 year ago +22 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– Mpetey123 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Yeah from googling her, her think tank is a conservative libertarian one. She could easily make a political argument against him. The fact she explicitly states it's not a political argument is telling. This reeks of Reddit tier, hey ladies what normal things that guys do give you the ick.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Dialectic 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Childless cat ladies (by choice, not from medical event) are indeed insufferable

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Star of David in Twitter bio

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Guy_Incognito76 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

JD Vance doesn't seem to poll well with women. No alpha vibes like Trump.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– acp_k2win 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

He had to settle for a jeeta so that is many negative points against him.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– deleted 27 points 1 year ago +27 / -0
▲ 17 ▼
– Mpetey123 17 points 1 year ago +17 / -0

Peter Thiel is the reason that Vance is in the position he is in.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– deleted 14 points 1 year ago +14 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– Mpetey123 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

It's not. Blackpilled, sorry to keep bringing him up, was talking about him in his Gay Republicans episode. Peter Thiel is a rich gay Republican that is behind Vance's rise.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– BeefyBelisarius 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

So Vance likely was bent over the casting couch before his political rise?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Assassin47 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

There's also the weird Atlantic article with Mitt Romney talking about how JD Vance was supposed to be the chosen one, almost like he was being groomed, but then utterly disappointed him by abruptly switching to Trumpism.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– covok48 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Your post is the reason why we need Imp back.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Benevolentdictator 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

The movie wasn't very good.

It hardly covers any of his backstory and leaves big holes.

It mostly just flips back & forth between flashbacks & him already being at Yale with the brown.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy