2
Guy_Incognito76 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the people calling PF feds are feds and this unhinged reply doesn't exactly dispel that suspicion. Andrew Torba has certainly done more for us than any of these anons.

6
Guy_Incognito76 6 points ago +6 / -0

Honestly the scene where the four hobbits are back at the pub and everyone else is super happy, the looks on the actors' faces sells it all.

https://www.hobartpulp.com/web_features/great-moments-in-cinematic-drinking-nbsp-lord-of-the-rings-the-return-of-the-king

1
Guy_Incognito76 1 point ago +1 / -0

idk when I read RotK as a kid the scouring flipped the book and made me hate it. it's such a massive buzzkill/climax killer. You mean they're not DONE YET?! Note that one of the most common complaints of the movie is that it seems like it's going end like four times, imagine the audience revolt if they put the full Scouring in? Come on. They HAD to cut it.

I know it's the theme that ties the hobbit's journey full circle but omg it DESTROYS the pacing of the story.

34
Guy_Incognito76 34 points ago +34 / -0

Vatican 2 has been fully exposed as a Jewish ploy at this point the real question is why hasn't the entire church rejected it

2
Guy_Incognito76 2 points ago +2 / -0

The left loses in the court 9 time only to win on the 10th or 20th or 100th. Nothing is the law of the land.

10
Guy_Incognito76 10 points ago +10 / -0

The ps3 store is still open? Nintendo long ago canned the 3ds and wiiu stores.

5
Guy_Incognito76 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wasn't there a story where a jeet tries to walk off with an 8 year old, and when they hauled him into court he said in his culture its totally fine, and they were like oh okay, right, off you go then

Also I recall hearing that one of the final straw issues for the revolt against the British was them raising the age of consent to like 12 or something

2
Guy_Incognito76 2 points ago +2 / -0

The guy who wrote the amendment clearly stipulated "this won't apply to illegals" but did not include it in the text. So either the amendment was written by an idiot or they viewed it as so self evident they didn't need to mention it. Kind of like how the founders would never in a million years extend freedom of religion to non Christians.

3
Guy_Incognito76 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean, clearly we've been operating under birthright for a long time, it would be a massive change to throw it out now. It's just insane how the court decides to become strict textualists when it's something that helps the left. Meanwhile when clear and plain language the left dislikes is brought up we have to hear about "emanations and penumbras." E.g. segregation.

9
Guy_Incognito76 9 points ago +9 / -0

every British person was kicked from India, even the ones born there.

10
Guy_Incognito76 10 points ago +10 / -0

American Krogan has a good take on this. When we pine for a past without woke they say that society "never existed," but when they try to justify destroying society they point to that very same idyllic past as justification. It exists if you argue it was bad.

3
Guy_Incognito76 3 points ago +3 / -0

They cam back when the MoU was signed to declared total victory. They're probably saying right now how this is all Iran's fault.

17
Guy_Incognito76 17 points ago +17 / -0

plan trusters on suicide watch

4
Guy_Incognito76 4 points ago +4 / -0

The funny thing is if you leave Muslims alone in the west for like one generation they all become performative westernized posers. I have seen burqas that are form fitting showing off every curve with glittery lettering, which follows the letter but not the spirit of the law.

It requires enormous propaganda and constant fear mongering and bribing by external forces to keep the crazy train going, remove that and its a minor problem.

5
Guy_Incognito76 5 points ago +5 / -0

People who point to the worst abuses of Islamic fundamentalists cry foul when you point to the worst abuses of orthodox jews.

8
Guy_Incognito76 8 points ago +8 / -0

I still remember my dad coming home one day and saw me watching Family Matters. He slumps down on the couch and says, kinda off-handedly, "Get those goddamned niggers off my TV."

I asked what his problem was with black people and he said, "I don't have a problem with blacks, I have a problem with TV that shows blacks acting like that. They aren't like that." Of course it took me a long time to realize what he meant.

I still think the real reason Michael Moye created Married With Children (Aka "Not the Cosbys") was a backhanded callout of Cosby's fake humor. Bill Cosby sold the fantasy of the upper-middle class black family man--just like you, but a little more wacky! Cosby was an outlier because most blacks did ghetto humor (e.g. Richard Pryor), so Cosby kept his carefully family friendly (coached by jewish writers of course. When Cosby tried to make his own thing it became Leonard Part Six). Other comics called him out, said he was being disingenuous. He grew up poor, flunked out of school, joined the navy and was discharged, worked crap jobs. Dude didn't know shit about upper class people. But Boomers ate that up. Moye saw right through it.

If Cosby got success acting white, he'd do one better and show whites acting black. Al Bundy has little in common with white working class fathers, but speaks clearly to black men. Wife only cares about money, daughter is an open whore, son wants to be a rapper. Insipid white neighbors, dead end retail job, constantly lusting after white women, only worthwhile accomplishments were in high school sports. Black black black. Al Bundy is a negro.

4
Guy_Incognito76 4 points ago +4 / -0

The punishment of chapter 1 sets up the reward of becoming godlike later

1
Guy_Incognito76 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's quite good for a remake. Needs a high end pc though. It's fairly simple yet Gothic really has a sort of magic that few modern rpgs capture.

7
Guy_Incognito76 7 points ago +7 / -0

What I don't understand is why Iran keeps making deals. They're never going to be honored until Israel is destroyed.

view more: Next ›