2
The_Shadow_of_Intent 2 points ago +2 / -0

Careful with the phrasing there. It sounds like you're saying you're a pedophile for different, unrelated reasons. And, to be clear, I'm just having fun with the phrasing, not calling you a pedophile.

Lol, whoops

Some people take shit way too far and call you names for liking a canonically sixteen year old fictional character. That's absurd. They don't present as underage, physically, mentally, or story-wise. So that's even sillier than arguing over lolis. They're cartoon characters. If the story only works if they're very young, that's a bit weird, but almost always the story would work the same if they were twenty or thirty too because, again, all the actions and stakes are serious and adult.

I was curious, and looked it up, because I wanted a Western equivalent cartoon. Daphne from Scooby-Doo is apparently sixteen, and is well known for being hot. No one accuses you of being a pedo if you say Daphne is sexy. It's some weird anime-exclusive thing.

Yeah, exactly this. From the same society that was happy to discuss Jennifer Lawrence's 19-year old swimsuit pics on CNN.

4
The_Shadow_of_Intent 4 points ago +4 / -0

In a normally functioning culture it's uncontroversial to say a developed teenager is attractive, but that's based on adults respecting decorum and not being habitual line steppers.

Male sexuality completely unregulated by culture or law (in other words, by other men) is often predatory. See Pitcairn Island (pop. 35), where the Polynesian-white population was dominated by a few men that raped girls as soon as they turned 12. This became completely normal for the whole island. Or certain strains of Mexican culture that overlook your uncle or older cousin touching you.

1
The_Shadow_of_Intent 1 point ago +1 / -0

Love Rei-II, never fapped to her, not a pedophile.

Also when I'm talking about this with friends there's an unstated qualifier that you're assuming the character is aged up. Their personality and look is what makes them attractive obviously, and when watching a show you're forced into a peer perspective.

2
The_Shadow_of_Intent 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wanted to find the full clip that aired on CSPAN2, and not one with overly dramatic music playing, but I think the original is gone or lost, and all that is left are these clips. Anyway, here's a somewhat tolerable clip. Sorry about the music, I didn't add it.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/KeQPw_Oeh-M

Like a lot of trailblazers he was completely correct, just well ahead of his time.

6
The_Shadow_of_Intent 6 points ago +6 / -0

"Loli" comes from Japanese "lolita" culture, which in turn took the name from Nabokov's novel Lolita about a pedophile's rambling journey over the US with his 12-year old stepdaughter. So the term has non-pornographic associations, but also has been entwined with sexual content from the very start. "Weird" is the adjective that comes to mind.

6
The_Shadow_of_Intent 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah, and also deported one of the leading Palestinian protesters at Columbia, and just revoked the visa of a Brown professor for attending a Hezbollah funeral. All small potatoes to Eric, barely worth mentioning. He's mad that Trump doesn't stop people from heckling him on X.

5
The_Shadow_of_Intent 5 points ago +5 / -0

Groypers post daily about hating Trump and countersignal everything he does and yet this idiot doesn't think there's enough distance between Trump and them?

edit: what is this goof talking about lol

"the middle"? Didn't Trump just win a landslide election capturing all swing states, bellwether counties, and demos?

What kind of chutzpah do you need to position the 85% of Jews who voted for Harris as "the middle"??

1
The_Shadow_of_Intent 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you're both making the same mistake. There is no "new faction" of the right. What we're really seeing is a multitude of groups with fuzzy separations where the only real commonality is they are against the insanity of today's left. The gay 2A advocate, the pro-life boomer, the free-speech absolutionist, the union guy who has personally felt the open borders, the anti-feminization manosphere guy, the AIPAC neocon, the race-realist; they're not natural allies. At least not on every front.

Indeed, this is a new coalition under a new "big tent" and if I implied otherwise that's my mistake. But the faction that is gaining the most ground is by far the ethnonationalists.

That's why we've got to be extremely careful about purity spiraling. The best we can realistically aim for is: get government and the courts out of it and let culture and social pressure resolve the rest. That's the common ground. Shame worked great before. It's the infestation of lawyers into every aspect of human interaction that's destroyed the US.

And in that vein, this forum isn't a bad example. We don't have a united voice on every issue. But we don't need it to be an echo chamber. That's not the point. The free exchange of idea is.

Yep

25
The_Shadow_of_Intent 25 points ago +25 / -0

Wait wait wait... crucified Christ?

A certain kind of people who did this?

4
The_Shadow_of_Intent 4 points ago +4 / -0

Any legal sanction on lolicon should be avoided for the above reasons. I'm speaking to the de facto definition of porn, although I just realized this thread was mostly about the legality of it.

3
The_Shadow_of_Intent 3 points ago +4 / -1

the recent mutation of them thinking ugly tranny sheboons are also sexy is just that, a mutation, not a distinctly different thing from them generally pushing promiscuity, hedonism, and escapism.

People forget that trap culture was one of the contributors to trans culture, and that came from anime.

anime is not crucial to the right-wing worldview and i find it almost parody i even have to mention that.

It's true anime isn't crucial per se - but it is also true that anime advocacy will be a part of any RW movement because it is a globally recognized cultural force that is largely independent of Western lib influence.

2
The_Shadow_of_Intent 2 points ago +4 / -2

It should be no secret that the idealized vision of the financially conservative, socially Libertarian, anti-Globalist, populist Right that is currently enjoying a brief ascendancy was brought about by a wave of young, Internet-savvy independents swinging to the Right since 2014. You saw them everywhere on social media before the vast purges began. For the sake of brevity, let's call them "the Anime Right."

Contrasted against them are the "Tradcon Right." These are the financially insolvent, socially oppressive, globalist powermongering boomers who have dominated the establishment Right for at least the past half century, as well as a smaller but loud swell of ambitious newfags who want to emulate them because the libertarian populism part won't make you a billionaire or get you fawned over on Fox News.

This analysis contains a lot of truth, but misses the mark in some important ways.

  1. "Socially libertarian" is not a good descriptor of a body politic that is completely intolerant of transgenders and has swung radically against gays. Only 15% of the LGBT vote went to Trump, about the same percentage as the Jewish vote. Also, since you're using this forum as a proxy for the "anime right," then it should be noted that we're so tilted against gays that they're considered the victims of pedophiles and mostly latent pedophiles themselves. There were gay posters on reddit KiA/KiA2, can't think of any here.

  2. On the subject of the "tradcon" right, the old "tradcon" faction you speak of uncritically embraces feminism and no-fault divorce somehow, whereas the strongest voices in the new right want to make childrearing the primary life focus of women again and keep signaling that we should repeal women's right to vote.

I would say the ascendant faction on the right is actually a third party I will call the "1488 right." Lol. That is actually more serious than it is a joke, but maybe the "ethnonationalist" or "race realist" right are better labels since the key belief is that everything worth preserving about Western civilization can only be sustained by majority white populations. Collinear with this objective are stances of isolationism (anti-globalism), anti-feminism, anti-LGBT, anti-degeneracy, rejection of Jewish influence, and pro-Christianity. That last part may be a little shocking to say out loud, but I think it is easily appreciable to anyone who can look at patterns with an open mind.

The ethnonationalist right obviously did not form out of rigid ideology. Rather, the majority of it has come to that camp out of practical considerations. The boilerplate out of the old "tradcon" right was wholly inadequate to explain the fall of Western culture and society, and the left was attempting to hasten the process, so both must be rejected and more radical explanations must be considered. This practical attitude is why a lot of people here hold formerly unconventional positions like embracing adult Legos, video games, and anime, because there is no utility in rejecting those things other than signaling plaid shirt lumberjack conservatism for the Daily Wire (see the old tradcon right).

HOWEVER, an anti-degen, anti-pedophile, anti-prostitution, anti-promiscuity, pro-Christian faction is not oriented toward porn. Let alone cartoon porn of individuals with prepubescent characteristics. I can't recall a single prominent RW account that has signaled for porn.

Does this mean supporting legal bans on loli? No, due to practical considerations. But I'm fine with Steam banning it.

The reason that this place is still split on moral approval of porn and loli is because of the strong influence of the manosphere RW, which is a defensive reaction to a feminist society that has systematically crushed every male activity and interest for decades. The manosphere counters this by rejecting every single criticism of men as a group. But in the end, to try to embrace porn and reject promiscuous culture is an incoherent position.

1
The_Shadow_of_Intent 1 point ago +2 / -1

RondoOBlongo 4 hours ago +3 / -1
And one in five (American) women are sexually assaulted in college

Are you for real with this rape culture talking point? Lol

-1
The_Shadow_of_Intent -1 points ago +3 / -4

You may as well attest that National Geographic photos of topless natives are pornography. We all know the difference between Goku's caricature and erotica.

32
The_Shadow_of_Intent 32 points ago +34 / -2

You are right that Judaism is going to obliterate the establishment right, but it won't even obliterate the MAGA right. MAGA is the people and their mass convictions, not the handful of influencers trying to keep reins on the movement. All leading indicators show they're trending away from Zionism and foreign intervention.

For example, Candace Owens put her career out to die on the hill of anti-Zionism, and she's more alive than ever. Her former employer Ben Shapiro is the one that's shriveling away in the podcast wilderness.

Joe Rogan just hosted Ian Carroll, the guy who's famous for ratioing Elon Musk with a 2000 word tweet about subversive Jewish influence, and then Daryl Cooper, the guy who's most famous for revisionist WWII history. Anyone think that's an accident?

A lot of people look at current viewership and influence when they should be looking at trends. The trends are all against Israel. Yes, the establishment is conducting a full court press to quash this, but that's obviously doomed. Has anyone in human history succeeding in putting the cat back in the bag?

5
The_Shadow_of_Intent 5 points ago +5 / -0

Two thoughts. First, if we believe it's true, can it be in vain?

Yes. If you say "Christ is King" while promoting manifestly unchristian behavior, you are implying that Christ endorses you and cheapening the name. This is the definition of taking God's name in vain.

I supported Candace Owens when she proclaimed Christ is King after the Daily Wire tried to persecute her for her faith. I like Jake Shields but he can't be saying Christ is King while unrepentantly living an unchristian lifestyle.

Not to beat a dead horse, but Nick Fuentes saying Christ is King while laughing at groyper rape memes is disgusting.

This is basically the reason the book of Isaiah was written. The Jews were patting themselves on the back for worshiping God, but they were told their proclamations were worse than useless considering their deeds.

Having said all that, the Daily Wire is the only reason we're talking about this at all because they can't bring themselves to admit they simply lost the moral high ground to Candace over Gaza.

2
The_Shadow_of_Intent 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn, Jenna Ortega looks like she's on that accelerated Mexican aging program.

13
The_Shadow_of_Intent 13 points ago +13 / -0

It's pretty weird a lot of people can't tell. Maybe they're Indians

7
The_Shadow_of_Intent 7 points ago +7 / -0

Conley, a janitor with a history of chain gang service, testified that Frank asked him to help move Phagan's body after Frank killed her.

In 1982, Alonzon Mann, Frank's former office boy, stated in an interview with The Tennessean that he saw Jim Conley carrying Phagan's body to the basement on the day of the murder, with Conley threatening to kill him if he spoke out

Checks out

1
The_Shadow_of_Intent 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's the spokesman of the group.

Armed resistance against an illegally occupying force is in fact legal under international law. Not all jews are zionists either.

But I see how this is going.

Yeah, and it ain't going nowhere good.

4
The_Shadow_of_Intent 4 points ago +4 / -0

+1. All the humor is "I can't believe a blockbuster Hollywood movie is allowing this!", but I have no problem believing it. I've seen it dozens of times now. So the jokes just don't have punchlines for me.

51
The_Shadow_of_Intent 51 points ago +51 / -0

Unlimited African aid will probably be looked at as one of the biggest mistakes in history, and it might not even take long. People are loathe to think of any kind of human population management, because Nazis, but reality is fast approaching.

view more: Next ›