Are you going one of those people who pretends he can't tell the difference between pornographic content and non pornographic content? Or even worse that there isn't any difference because there is no bright border line between the two?
The continuum between cute --> suggestive --> pornographic is wide and blurry but just because the exact boundaries are subjective doesn't mean the categories don't exist.
We know what it is, they know what it is, they are just hiding behind ambiguity and whataboutism because being honest about it is still outside of overton.
It is exactly like for homos. They would have so many fewer problems if they could just pretend to be normal unless they knew for sure they were amongst their own kind.
Let normal people live their lives without having to think about degeneracy.
Nobody does regardless of whether or not they agree with or voted for it or whatever. That is the way things work.
Do you think Trump supported that tarded business records law they tried to jail him for a billion years over? If someone wants to get you, and they have the pull, they well.
Breathe man. Oxygen to the brain. If the plurality of the show isn't questionable then there is no reason to do anything about it. Just get rid of the one part.
But you haven't answered the question. What are they drawings of?
That is all laws, all laws can be used against anyone who publicly engages in any activity because they are all subjective to a "reasonableness" test.
And that is good because the real purpose of laws isn't to tell people what to do and not to do but to be a legitimizing pretext for collectively harming bad people.
I don't want islam in my country but I'm fine with them practicing it in their sandy craphole countries
And I'm not going to countersignal when they are attacking my other enemies, when that happens keep your mouth shut, stay out of it, let them fight
trannies were just a tactic in the toolbox of the distintegrationists
jews have been doing their subversion thing since rome conclusively proved they were inferior militarily in the 100s
you have to understand that we are just collateral damage in a war between two jewish factions - both of them agree on the end goal, a world where everything and everyone is owned by jews, they disagree on how to go about it
-
globalists/communists (left) - less zealous, more secular, are basically trying to make star trek happen. Believe that their utopia is right around the corner and the only thing standing in the way is Whites and Christians who stubbornly don't want to go extinct and care about "outdated" stuff like (non jewish) ethnic nations.
-
zionists/israel first nationalists (right) - more zealous, more religious, are looking to take decade of the 2000s global where Israel calls all of the shots behind the scenes in every significant country, and can sic their biggest minion, the US on the enemies of israel at a whim. Is fine with leaving a false veneer of national sovereignty as long as it is generally directed toward the interests of Israel.
Both use infiltration and subversion, both are against any kind of White ethnic identity (generational hatred against Rome).
Where they disagree is the zionists pretend to be pro "West" (not Christendom) because they want the west strong enough to fight israels its battles, the globalists work to weaken all White nations in favor of passing sovereignty to "international" organizations that they are effectively in charge of. Ironically the UN is one of the few that neither the jewish globalists nor zoinists are in charge of because of how muslim countries vote as a block.
MADD was yet another crusade of urban liberal women against rural working class men. Because those "backwards rednecks" were the ones most likely to be in a position to drive home from the bar after working a hard shift.
The "drunk driving" statistics were entirely cooked. The key words are "alcohol related". If a drunk pedestrian jumps in front of a sober driver that is counted. If a passenger has alcohol but not the driver that is counted. If the person with alcohol in his system isn't at fault that is still counted. Solo crashes are counted even though a high percentage of the fatal ones are actually suicides. If a driver has alcohol but is under the legal limit, even significantly, that is counted. And here is the best one, if the driver wasn't tested that is usually counted because it is presumed that it is "alcohol related".
The auto makers supported it to virtue signal and to justify passing regulations of high-profit "safety" features like airbags and crumple zones that make it much more likely to total cars even in low speed collisions. Law enforcement was all over it because it gives them almost unlimited power over anyone who drives, including blatantly unconstitutional stuff like "sobriety" roadblocks. Government loves it because it is a non-tax revenue stream from unsympathetic targets (working class men) and a way to extract kickbacks from "traffic schools" and "interlock devices".