Or Hitler started WWII? Both were "preemptive strikes". Or will pro-Israel people admit that Israel started this and they're the aggressor?

Obviously, pro-Israel people will say Iran was asking for it but that's the same argument pro-Russian and pro-Hitler people use.

This attack should be adequate proof that "who started what" really doesn't matter. I never thought it mattered but I hope everyone else sees that it doesn't matter.

There's a post someone on here made recently that resonated with me. Basically, we have conditioned the new generation of men into believing women only magically become sexy at the age of 18, and even then, if you're over 35, anyone under the age of 23 is "still a child", even if they can legally vote, drink alcohol and smoke cigarettes.

And this is just weird to me. I grew up when men, including my own father would actively wolf-whistle to some of my teenaged female classmates, and although I chastised him for it, never thought it was out of the ordinary. They wore skinny jeans and yoga pants, had shapely posteriors and in some cases, big boobs. Legally, there's an obvious problem but societally, I don't think it's that big of an issue.

Let's say for the sake of example you're a recently-married man, you're both aged 21, and one day, your wife sits you down to go through some of her old photos.

We start with photos of her as a baby. Now, you'd have to be one sick fuck (or Ian Watkins) to find her hot in her infancy. A normal male brain would find her adorable.

Then she shows you a picture of when she was 20, a year earlier. Perfectly fine in finding this one hot, as this was when you already knew her quite well.

Then she shows you her toddler photos. Again, nothing to find attractive, only cute.

19 years old, just before the pair of you introduced. Largely the same woman you knew the first time you met her, just slightly younger. Sexy, right?

Then Grade School.

Then College.

Until eventually she converges around age 10, before any of her body has matured. You shouldn't be finding that attractive, purely because she's still evidently a child and none of her assets have yet bloomed.

Now, society wants you to think 18 is your cut-off point. The point just before sexy becomes adorable.

But I'd willing to bet any man in this hypothetical scenario wouldn't call 18 the earliest your wife looked "sexy". Let's imply her birthday is one week after Halloween, and one year, she decided to dress as your favorite fictional character.

Only problem is, she was 17 when those photos were taken. Or 16. Or perhaps even 15.

She still has fully-developed boobs with visible cleavage and thighs. Her height is well into 5' territory. But she's underaged in those photos.

Would you still find her sexy?

Let's do a bit of an experiment here. This scene from the 1991 movie Career Opportunities.

This is basically the only scene in the entire movie people remember. A 19 year old Jennifer Connelly riding a coin-operated horse. I know she's half Jewish and all that, but I would say that this is as close to "objectively sexy" as you can get. Her body is nubile and fully developed. She's hot.

So if you found her hot here, what's stopping you from feeling the same way towards her appearance in the 1989 movie Étoile, filmed in 1988 when she was 17?

How about this performance from a French TV show of the singer Alizée?

Granted, this was filmed in early 2003, and she was born in August 1984. So she's 18 here. Everything is fine and above board, although there are a lot of moralfags who think even this is wrong nowadays.

So here she is in June 2002, aged 17.

Now we're enter "problematic" territory again. She's not of legal age in the US, yet she still looks basically the same as she did in the 2003 video. A very similar body with accentuated thighs and chest. If you found her sexy in 2003, there's no reason you shouldn't also find her sexy here.

But 17 isn't that big of a deal, all things considered. So how about we look at something like this, "Cherry Bomb" by The Runaways?

Lead singer Cherrie Currie was born in late 1959, music video came out early 1976... you do the math. She's 16 here. Find her hot, you are statutorily a pedophile.

Or how about the most famous music video of my generation, Britney Spears' One More Time?

Yeah, she's 16 here too. You're a pedophile if you find her hot.

All The Things She Said by t.A.T.u?

Both of them were aged 15 in this video. A million sexual awakenings, but not because of faux lesbianism. But because you secretly had a thing for kids, you filthy pedophile! Off to the woodchipper!

Granted, a lot of this has been caused by over-sexualization of our culture, of people wearing things they shouldn't because they've been pressured into wearing them. But even if you take those items of clothing and make-up away, mid-late teens still have fully developed bodies. They are ovulating. Their breasts are ready to nurture an infant. The only reason you aren't allowed to be interested in females that age is because legally, they cannot be held responsible for actions they might initiate. We as men have to pretend not to be interested in them and the way we're going, any fully grown man won't be allowed to find anyone under the age of 26 sexy by the mid-point of this century.

So what gives? Anyone agree with me here?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhN4Rimxb4A

This does a pretty good job describing the usual progressive tactic of moral terrorism.