So recently i was watching another Frieren video responding to the retarded leftists complaining about "evil races in fiction" and in the comment of the video i saw someone mention how Extra credits video was an example of retarded leftists whining about "evil races in fiction" but it was about orcs instead so i was curious and went to see that video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymUEPKTEQaQ and the video recommended another retarded and ridiculously in depth article about how "evil races in fiction impacts minorities badly" and linked the article in the description of the video.

https://jamesmendezhodes.com/blog/2019/1/13/orcs-britons-and-the-martial-race-myth-part-i-a-species-built-for-racial-terror

And then i looked up the author of the article..... he was a filipino jewish guy from New York.

https://www.patreon.com/mndz/about

This link also has another link to one of his videos that complains about "gaming being too White". He doesn't mention his jewish heritage in his main website where he writes all the woke articles he only mentions his Filipino heritage, but he did mention his jewish heritage on his Patreon page.

Sigh....Im swear to god, i wasn't even trying to look for jews but it keeps happening.

16
14
39

This was just something that came to mind when I was reading over those posts (which I do plan on making something else later, as some other things came to mind that I wanna address later), but to keep to the title of the post, I do honestly feel like we're just throwing the word loli at anyone under the age of 18 in an anime when that has never been the case.

Kanna Kamui, from Miss Kobayashi's Dragon Maid, is a loli.

Anya Forger, from SPY X FAMILY, is a loli.

Eri, from My Hero Academia, is a loli.

Genshin Impact specifically has a 'short female' model, which nine playable characters have, and eight of them would be lolis, using the actual definition pre-'New Right' era (Diona, Kachina, Klee, Nahida, Qiqi, Sayu, Sigewinne and Yaoyao).

Why am I going through these examples? Mostly because I want to show people what characters fit under the classical definition used before the past few years of the anti-anime movement trying to use 'language creep' to muddle the definition.

I don't care which side of the argument you're on, I just wish that people would at the very least use the actual definitions of words because saying that Satsuki Kiryuin, Ryuko Matoi, Marin Kitagawa, among many other 'under 18 but visibly not like the kids I mentioned above' characters are lolis is rather bullshit and only serves to work against the right.

Just my two cents on the topic, but overall, whether or not things become legal or illegal, I am hoping that people are at least able to actually work with the true definitions of words rather than abusing language to get whatever they want. Attempts to ban Eastern media isn't going to make people suddenly love current Western media, it's going to make people further check out of society.

35
12
12

Personally, I think the guy was an uber mega lolcow. Not through his drawings and associated drama, mind you, but from his Oedipus fantasies and heroin addiction. He had the whole internet in the palm of his hand and basically pissed it all away.

But I believe he had the right to draw whatever the hell he wanted. It's weird seeing all the zoomers and alphas who were shitting their diapers during his prime present him like he's some sort of war criminal, when really he was just an overly horny, troubled, Swiss-Indian mongrel. He was the #1 Rule 34 artist for a good number of years, and he triggered all the right people. He went over the line a few times, but ultimately what he represented was a facet of internet culture that kept normalfaggots at bay.

84
76
92
62
72
34
53
14
42
46
52

Some people are asking why I'm saying that it is time to go if you are leaving, and prepare to stay and expect some bad shit if you are staying in the US.

This weekend we crossed a rubicon.

  1. Up until now, the Trump administration has mostly been sorta (those caveats are not an accident) obeying judicial orders. This weekend they let a plane full of migrants land in El Salvador AFTER the order came to turn the plane around.

  2. A US district judge ordered that a medical professor visiting Brown University with an HB1 visa not be deported until she had hearing. They deported her anyway.

  3. In the middle of the night, Trump announced an executive order rescinding the pre-emptive pardons of the January 6 committee by Joe Biden. He cannot do that, but he said he has.

NONE OF THIS IS A SURPRISE, if you are paying attention. It is, however a HORROR and an ESCALATION - a planned and predictable one, but an escalation.

Project 2025 is quite clear that there is no good mechanism for enforcement by federal courts. Yes, there are potential criminal penalties, including jail for most members of the administration, but they require either force or the implied threat of force to enact, and most of the power of force is in Trump's court. Moreover, he's sure he has the Supremes.

So let's be clear. NONE OF THESE THINGS HAD TO HAPPEN - that is, Trump probably would have successfully deported those folks even if the law had been followed. There was no reason to summarily rescind those executive orders, even if they could.

The Trump administration is testing the waters. They are doing intentionally illegal things on purpose to demonstrate that they can't be stopped. Then they will do more illegal things, and more serious ones.

Up until now, there have been shallow pretenses at the rule of law. Those are over. Trump and Musk and the rest will continue to push the boundaries harder and more violently and move them until we fight back enough to stop them.

Again, none of this is unpredictable, but it means that we've entered a more dangerous phase. If you are able to leave, you should. If you are able to protect yourself and others, you should. Now is the time to move.

The opportunity to act always comes before it is completely obvious that you have to. It is possible that things won't escalate quite as quickly or as badly as I think. But the signs are all there. We are a dictatorship, and the dictator is going to do as much harm as possible. Your choices now are endure, run, fight. I can't tell you what the right one is for you - all I know is it isn't "collaborate with the fuckers." And it is time to decide. I've made my choices.

Edited to add because I said it in a different post, not this one - I have 10 kids. Several with significant disabilities. I am caring for a disabled elder and disabled adult child who cannot emigrate and would not be welcome. I'm 100% aware of the difficulties. And yes, some of my kids are dependent for their lives on medication, including insulin. I GET IT. I am by no means saying "everyone go," or "these are easy choices" or "everyone has choices." I am saying that it will never be EASIER THAN TODAY to do whatever you are going to do.

106
51
49

Apparently Boris did go, but never told the Ukrainians not to sign the deal, they were already not going to sign the deal. Constantin looked up the video which supposedly stands as proof of this "Kremlin talking point" and because he could understand the Russian, apparently no such thing was said. But anyway

Not even half way in, and he's basically already said why I don't imagine we're actually going to get a cessation of hostilities.

When talking about what Ukraine will have to do to stop hostilities, Boris says they'll to come to the understanding that they'll have to give up the territories - TEMPORARILY - until they're strong enough to take them back.

So blatantly out in the open, from former British PM, we have full confirmation that whatever this is, will just be another Minsk agreement to buy Ukraine time to re-arm

Heh.

79
114
29
view more: Next ›