3
StaticNoise2 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm just joking. I thought it would be funny if a doctor diagnosed you as gay after doing a few rudimentary tests like hitting your knee with that small hammer, checking your heartbeat, etc.

18
StaticNoise2 18 points ago +18 / -0

Women don't trust women.

There's a video from the 1960s where as a candid camera type prank, they had a woman say she would be the pilot and the men, while very surprised and seeming like they don't know quite how to react to that news, but sort of are processing it, it was the women who were vocally concerned because women know women more than the way they present themselves to men, and it's just funny to see the women be more vocally nervous.

If you can't hear the first lady, she says "It just had to happen to us" to her husband, but it's the second lady who's the real gem of the video. It's a fascinating watch.

11
StaticNoise2 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm not kidding when I say it's essentially impossible to make your character look like a white male. Every eye type and skin shade makes your character look Asian at the most.

14
StaticNoise2 14 points ago +14 / -0

Whether you pick a male or female character, all the customization options are "non-binary".

Picked a man, but increase the chest slider? Now he's got Pamela Anderson boobs. Was hoping the chest slider would make me look like I bench press and don't subsist on a diet of soy latte's, but no, it gives you literal man-boobies

Same with hips, etc. You cannot make your male character not look like a faggot. You can't make him look masculine. The best you can do is like a metrosexual dude who is merely not fat and has a tiny amount of lean muscle like a runner. Those are your choices, metrosexual runner build, fat, skinny or tranny.

21
StaticNoise2 21 points ago +21 / -0

Now I'm in the character select.

Here are the starting choices that you can customize.

  1. Hispanic man

  2. Either very dark skinned asian woman or black woman with asian features

  3. Blonde Woman

  4. Black man

  5. Asian man

  6. Fat black woman with a loosely curly afro.

That's what I think of when I think of skaters.

12
StaticNoise2 12 points ago +12 / -0

By sharing anything in the playtest I risk being banned from all future EA playtests. I know that's a horrific fate to not be able to play EA slop for free in the future, but by golly I'm going to risk it.

This is the first time I'm actually playing the game. I had a survey about two months ago that asked me what I thought of the default character models. Yeah, I let them know what I thought, not that it'll make a difference. I'll try to share the screenshots of those character models tomorrow, I think I still have them in my screenshot folder.

4
StaticNoise2 4 points ago +4 / -0

He won Mr Universe, then becomes a millionaire in America with a brick laying company before he gets famous acting.

If he can’t garner some level of respect for basically achieving 5 lifetimes worth of accomplishments then no one can.

Am I extremely disappointed in his going along with the COVID stuff? Yes, but if we’re going there, I have to write-off family members too?

16
StaticNoise2 16 points ago +17 / -1

Agreed.

People who are busy and don't go on internet forums and twitter are advantaged in the sense that it's better to be productive and live your life, but are disadvantaged when it comes to accepting narratives. They have no other source of information coming in so they hear what the media says, and then because of the framing get angry and go hard on the opposition.

Which we would too if the media framing was reality.

If there truly a deadly disease akin to the black plague and it would save countless lives if people took ten minutes out of their day to get a harmless vaccine, we'd be outraged at people who didn't do it.

Productive people like Schwarzenegger aren't going around looking at all the info. They're hanging out with buddies, family, and most relevant, living in a happy little bubble because of his wealth and position in society.

So it's not that he hates freedom, but that he was really angry at the false straw-men erected by the media and spoke in anger. I say this because it's uncharacteristic of his life in general. So I'm more willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.

1
StaticNoise2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry for the YouTube retard, it's just what popped across my feed and I figured the full clip posted from the view would be a longer form interview.

-6
StaticNoise2 -6 points ago +2 / -8

You're right. Every single post on Reddit is fake. It's all made by bots and foreigners. No people actually think like that.

Those radicalized college students, after leaving their starbucks job for the day...you know what they do? They sit in their apartment and stare at the wall.

They certainly don't go on Reddit because that's only bots and Europeans pretending on that site.

-14
StaticNoise2 -14 points ago +2 / -16

They have Jew Derangement Syndrome. This place has been subverted for a while.

6
StaticNoise2 6 points ago +6 / -0

I see green screen meme potential, like editing in someone fat like Boogie2298 falling behind her in the background

4
StaticNoise2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, ONA and Howard Stern are the obvious targets and everyone knows about how they pushed the culture for the worse, even though I like Anthony Cumia and respect his opinion as a conservative.

Jim Norton was a huge part of the O and A show. Once he came on, it really became the Anthony and Jimmy show, which is one of the reasons the bitterness from Opie started reaching critical mass. So his role in the show as a voice is hard to understate.

Way more people heard him on the radio than watched his stand up acts, and he's better at having quick witty responses to people than he is at doing the whole standup format. I too would watch his standup and it sucked and was gross.

He still had that element in a big way on the radio, but he would also talk seriously about things, dive into the philosophy of things, and he had the comedic playing off of people that you don't get with standup. Him ribbing with others like Patrice O'neal endeared him in a way that standup wouldn't.

Yeah Stern and O&A were big obvious degenerate pushers, but his role is one that doesn't get brought up and is pushing that specific "intersectional niche" in a "palatable way" which is why I'm bringing it up.

Typically if, like a troon were to come on to Howard Stern for the shock factor, it would be as a one and done guest. Listeners would forget and move on as soon as the next crazy drama happened the next day.

With Jim Norton being a permanent host, it allowed this to be a lingering persistent idea put into people's heads.

I'm not defending Stern, O and A or any other shock jocks. I wish they never happened. I would like an America like the 1950s.

I'm just pointing out a specific role Jim Norton played.

11
StaticNoise2 11 points ago +11 / -0

And this phenomenon (though because men are wired different, it isn’t the same for us….we don’t need our “emotions validated”. Women are obsessed with that concept) to the degree that it exists is a feminist creation sowing distrust and fear in the minds of women and fundamentally misunderstanding the nature of men who generally want to help women more than harm.

But they are so easily propagandized that they will let their guard down for gang bangers and view white men, even kind ones with suspicion because they’re hooked on true crime which only focuses on white killers.

The absolute dire situation between the sexes is a modern, feminist created problem, and that same degenerate feminism that convinced this woman to try to be a man, has influenced her thinking so that when even experiencing first hand, she cannot arrive at logical conclusions or solutions.

That and the female mind, left to its own devices also cannot comprehend the masculine ways of thinking and interacting with the world.

4
StaticNoise2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly, was scrolling to see if someone was going to say that.

8
StaticNoise2 8 points ago +12 / -4

I'm sorry, as a white male I know I have a lot of blind spots when it comes to privilege and internalized supremacist thinking/biases.

I'm trying to be more informed on these areas and address them when I find them in myself and call them out in others as well. I'm not looking for a pat on the back for that, I know that's literally the bare minimum for being a decent human being. I'm just meaning to say that I'm sorry and I'll try to do better and thank you for bringing that to my attention. You are seen and heard, I hope my response didn't come off as mansplaining or colonialist...sometimes I over-explain which I've been told is a colonialist patronizing stance that white males like myself fall into. I'm sorry if that's how it's coming across, just wanted to acknowledge your lived experience as legitimate and recognize my screw up/bigoted blindness.

-4
StaticNoise2 -4 points ago +1 / -5

To how Israel handles the enemies at their gates, I don't understand why they're considered genociders.

Muslims across the world have made it known they want Israel nuked off the map.

When Israel was refounded after WW2, there was a deal drafted that would have actually given "Palestine" a ton of favor, but the Muslims were licking their lips going "we'll destroy them quickly" and refused to take the deal. Once Israel was established, the attacks against Israel started immediately, but what should have been an easy destruction of Israel, they could never destroy them.

But they've been attacking them constantly ever since.

In war, innocents get hurt. When we nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki, some would call that a genocide. If we're going by the standard that's held to Israel it would be, but war has different rules.

When you are being attacked by terrorists and in retaliation innocents on the other side get harmed, that's war....that's why you don't want war, and it's not a war that Israel started.

Listen to and pay attention to these lyrics from this song written in the 80s. It's as pertinent and true today as it was back then.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sr3gyxCm6pU

-3
StaticNoise2 -3 points ago +2 / -5

Question for people here who are so adamant against Dave Portnoy here.

How would you feel about some lefty, which they often do, getting on stage and saying "F- white people and Christians".

We're outraged when they do that.

There's no humor to it, because we rightly see it's their desire to kill white people and Christians under the thin guise of "jokes".

The world has made it known to Jews and Israel it wants them destroyed. You don't think they feel similarly to the way we do when some lefty retard says "F- whites and Christians".

I used to make Jew jokes and still do to a degree, but the feel and temperature is different now and it isn't just a funny thing like how Family Guy would make fun of stereotypes. The temperature of the room is very different.

His frustration I agree with, but I'm against banning jokes.

I think though people who say "F the Jews" and "F whitey and Christians" should be viewed the same way. As bitter, murderous in their heart, hateful people who want to destroy a people and cheer on their demise. Sure let them say it, but people ought to defend the ones on the receiving end, ie; turnabout is fair play, but no one does with Jews. The only ones who defend Jews are an increasingly small amount of Christians who understand the world persecutes the Jews continuously as well as Christians and it will be this way until Christ returns.

This isn't because Jews are saved, they aren't. But the Abrahamic covenant still has Jews in Satan's crosshairs as they will one day repent at the end times and Israel/Jerusalem is the center of all the world history and will be the place Christ reigns from.

At least when white people and Christians are attacked by leftists, there's a litany of people of all races calling out the hypocrisy.

I don't see Jews getting afforded that same luxury. The current right hates the Jews, and the left hates Israel and always sides with "Palestine".

So that's why I think Dave Portnoy would be more apt to feel like legal action needs to happen, because Jews have no defenders pretty much even though I totally disagree with what Dave wants but I understand that he feels helpless. As a Christian, I see even atheists defend us nowadays as even they see the double standard given to Muslims vs Christians.

Who defends Jews?

Like I said, an increasingly shrinking amount of Christians.

I also don't get too worried about jokes at our expense because I know the end of the book, Revelation, and I have faith in God, and I know if God is for us, who can be against us.

Jews don't have that promise or hope, so they look to world solutions to their persecution. If Christians had no assurance that God is in control and have no eternal outlook, Christians would very possibly respond similarly to Dave Portnoy here when it comes to the persecution Christians face.

-2
StaticNoise2 -2 points ago +1 / -3

Question for people here who are so adamant against Dave Portnoy here.

How would you feel about some lefty, which they often do, getting on stage and saying "F- white people and Christians".

We're outraged when they do that.

There's no humor to it, because we rightly see it's their desire to kill white people and Christians under the thin guise of "jokes".

The world has made it known to Jews and Israel it wants them destroyed. You don't think they feel similarly to the way we do when some lefty retard says "F- whites and Christians".

I used to make Jew jokes and still do to a degree, but the feel and temperature is different now and it isn't just a funny thing like how Family Guy would make fun of stereotypes. The temperature of the room is very different.

His frustration I agree with, but I'm against banning jokes.

I think though people who say "F the Jews" and "F whitey and Christians" should be viewed the same way. As bitter, murderous in their heart, hateful people who want to destroy a people and cheer on their demise. Sure let them say it, but people ought to defend the ones on the receiving end, ie; turnabout is fair play, but no one does with Jews. The only ones who defend Jews are an increasingly small amount of Christians who understand the world persecutes the Jews continuously as well as Christians and it will be this way until Christ returns.

This isn't because Jews are saved, they aren't. But the Abrahamic covenant still has Jews in Satan's crosshairs as they will one day repent at the end times and Israel/Jerusalem is the center of all the world history and will be the place Christ reigns from.

At least when white people and Christians are attacked by leftists, there's a litany of people of all races calling out the hypocrisy.

I don't see Jews getting afforded that same luxury. The current right hates the Jews, and the left hates Israel and always sides with "Palestine".

So that's why I think Dave Portnoy would be more apt to feel like legal action needs to happen, because Jews have no defenders pretty much even though I totally disagree with what Dave wants but I understand that he feels helpless. As a Christian, I see even atheists defend us nowadays as even they see the double standard given to Muslims vs Christians.

Who defends Jews?

Like I said, an increasingly shrinking amount of Christians.

I also don't get too worried about jokes at our expense because I know the end of the book, Revelation, and I have faith in God, and I know if God is for us, who can be against us.

Jews don't have that promise or hope, so they look to world solutions to their persecution. If Christians had no assurance that God is in control and have no eternal outlook, Christians would very possibly respond similarly to Dave Portnoy here when it comes to the persecution Christians face.

15
StaticNoise2 15 points ago +15 / -0

I love this quote.

I don't remember it word for word, but it's basically this:

"If you ascribe incompetence to malice, you will be overrun with both....if you ascribe malice to incompetence, both will quickly disappear"

34
StaticNoise2 34 points ago +34 / -0

This should be the assumed default for any modern game.

It's why I'm enjoying saving my money and replaying classics and discovering great games I hadn't played yet.

Between emulators, backlog, and abandonware, I'll never come close to running out of games

There are a few exceptions.

I'll eventually get Tony hawk 3+4 when it's on sale for five bucks for instance.

Same with doom dark ages.

But the days of buying new releases within even the first year or two are basically over.

There's a few things that could make me break that rule.

  1. A neverending story video game

  2. The Max Payne trilogy remake if it actually looks like they don't screw it up

  3. A non-woke fallout 3 remake

  4. A non woke remake of shadows of the empire.

  5. A handful of other remakes of all time favorites

-12
StaticNoise2 -12 points ago +2 / -14

Same boat. I support Israel and Jews because of the Biblical covenant that hasn't been nullified as explained in Romans 11.

I don't agree with "hate speech" laws while also really hating the antisemitism.

view more: Next ›