2
Kienan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, it's more along the lines of "His body's biological sex betrays his body's biological sex."

11
Kienan 11 points ago +12 / -1

I'm not lying in the slightest. You don't count movies he directed himself, bit parts or movies nobody's ever heard of.

Ah, so we're just making up rules now, cool. Also, even with your criteria it still doesn't hold up. He directed none of those fifteen movies. All have Mel's name and image prominently on the cover...except the movie you're talking about. Literally. The one film you picked to focus on focuses the least on Mel Gibson.

And, I don't follow movies closely, but Fatman and Boss Level both seemed relatively big and mainstream. Professor and the Madman, too, I believe.

So you're once again incredibly off base.

11
Kienan 11 points ago +12 / -1

You don't think it's suspicious that he met this girl fairly recently and then re-activated his long dead career?

His only acting credit since the Expendables 3 was directed by her.

All fifteen of the movies (quite the dead career!) he's been in since Expendables 3 were directed by the same person? And, to answer my own question...no. One of them was directed by her.

You're just not trustworthy in the slightest when it comes to this stuff. You've done this before, in very similar circumstances. I'm not sure if you're lying, or so delusional that you just stop looking and write in the rest, after you see one woman in the credits that confirms your existing biases. It's very tiresome.

If you want to be taken seriously, stop lying.

5
Kienan 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think it's more that he has been trained to want to be a she and, despite what the activists say, the females don't actually have penises. So it's not about ballet and penises, it's about trying to pretend to be a girl, but still having a penis.

Bit of an obstacle, at least until the powers that be can train all that bigoted "biology" out of the masses.

14
Kienan 14 points ago +14 / -0

At this stage in her development, Gabby’s body still betrays her gender identity

Gender is a social construct. Also, we must conform to social constructs! These people are insane and, often, evil. The poor kid, too. No one deserves that shit.

1
Kienan 1 point ago +1 / -0

That smug looking Nick Kerr though. Clever boy probably slipped through based on his name.

3
Kienan 3 points ago +3 / -0

I love how in those videos, the women get absolutely destroyed consistently, and the commentators still just focus on how "brave" they are, or something. "She's not backing down, amazing!" Yeah, but she's being made to look like someone who's never even played the game she's a professional of. That's nothing to cheer, that's embarrassing as hell. Culture is so twisted.

2
Kienan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hahaha, a million dollar prize, and the men still didn't even need to go all out. They were just chilling, as they utterly dominated.

2
Kienan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sadly, I can tell your posts just by the absurdity. "That's insane...bet that's an Australia post...probably bamboozler."

I think I have a 100% success rate so far. I feel bad for Australians, your country has gone utterly insane, even compared to other Western countries.

1
Kienan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't even think it was body strength, primarily; the men just played significantly better soccer in general. The women had no ball control, kept passing the ball to their opponents, or even deflecting into the goal. Strength of course plays a part, but it was mainly a massive skill gap. The men had more skill, confidence, and just did everything smoother and faster.

2
Kienan 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you ever feel useless just remember that Wrexham had a goal keeper in this game

3
Kienan 3 points ago +3 / -0

We don't need 16 rules on an alt-tech site to begin with.

1
Kienan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let's have a debate : What will fix the schools?

Complete evacuation, followed by flamethrowers?

Nah, to be more serious, deregulation, competition, and decoupling from the government (especially federal) as much as possible. The teachers themselves are a massive problem, but at least if you allow competition and school choice, and get rid of the complete monopoly, "woke" schools would have to compete with sane schools.

10
Kienan 10 points ago +10 / -0

These people just redefine words as they go. A bunch of people in the comments saying various stupid things, like 'white people aren't even real,' and variations on apparently Pride (yes, it's being capitalized now, for some reason) is for those victimized or oppressed only, or relates to a safe space. Apparently if you're actually doing well you can't be proud, but if everyone shits on you you can?

Some of the comments:

Respectfully, black and gay pride are celebrated because they have been persecuted in western culture. White straight people have not for being white or straight. That's why. And "white pride" is associated with the KKK, the people who persecuted those minorities.


No, it's not. Because Pride is about creating safe spaces for people who historically don't have them. The oppressed

It is not the same when those with power use Pride to invade those spaces and absolutely everyone understands "white pride" as a threat


Is it honestly your sense that white folks- who dominate literally everything in our society- are now the subject of widespread discrimination that destroys our lives that we need one single day to lift ourselves up?


All other prides came about because they were always told they were unworthy and is some cases not even human. Mostly by White racists... there is no historical reason for White pride because in no time were White people ever told their "Whiteness" shows how unowrthy they are


The hilarious part is, these people are basically admitting that "pride" has nothing to do with reality or accomplishments, and is just a crutch for feeling good.

Also, no one wants to give any credence to that white people are attacked...even as they attack them in the comments.

23
Kienan 23 points ago +23 / -0

Pacifists are traitors, not to mention idiots.

Absolute pacifists, perhaps. But there's nothing wrong with desiring peace, or trying to avoid pointless or non-beneficial violence.

Violence is both omnipresent and necessary.

Universally, yes. Doesn't mean every occurrence or proposal of violence is good or just, just because violence as a concept is universal and often necessary.

Saying "Violence is bad" is stupid. Saying "This violence is bad" is, more often than not, a correct statement.

5
Kienan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yup, I mentioned that elsewhere, but wanted to keep it simple for this one. But, yeah, "white" doesn't mean what you're generally going to think "white" should logically mean. "White" crime stats are a jumble of a bunch of different things to the point of making it meaningless.

7
Kienan 7 points ago +7 / -0

The one thing I will give him is that the absolute % of criminals among the black population is still pretty small.

If progressives actually cared about helping black people, they'd lock up the black repeat offenders and throw away the keys. Black crime stats would drop like a rock if we as a society actually kept the worst of the worst in prison where they belong.

view more: Next ›