8
Kienan 8 points ago +8 / -0

...the boy...

Is this her son, or just some random boy? I'm guessing it's some privacy law protecting minors, but this whole framing is absurd and confusing. Did she abduct some random kid she knew from the neighborhood, or was it her own child? I'm guessing the latter, but it's just that, a guess.

McGovern went on to claim that the boy was missing, prompting a large-scale hunt for him involving 80 police officers, the force helicopter, and mountain rescue and coastguard personnel.

Putting aside the monstrous actions themselves, you'd think they would have at least nailed her for wasting police resources. They take that shit much more seriously than little things like attempted murder and child abuse.

First offender McGovern was assessed as being at a low risk of reoffending and someone who did not present a risk to the public.

Someone at low risk of reoffending wouldn't have offended in such a heinous and obviously unstable manner in the first place, numskulls.

...the child but he was only found 24 hours later when a man out walking his dog heard the youngster crying.

Major props to this dude. It was just right time, right place, but he's a hero.


Now... the excuses...

Lord Young said that she had suffered from clinical depression and anxiety linked to low self-esteem for many years but had made "great strides" towards getting her life together.

A bunch of people do, nowadays. They don't go out and try to murder children.

He said that she had weaned herself off illicit drugs, which was greatly to her credit, and her mental health had improved significantly.

Don't care; she was either giving the kid drugs directly, inadvertently exposing him, or giving him access. There's a limit to tolerance for this sort of thing, and she's well past it.

A hair sample revealed that the youngster was exposed to drugs from late June 2022. Mr Cameron said: "It is not possible to say with any greater precision when that exposure was nor in what quantity. The findings were, however, consistent with exposure on more than one occasion."

Yeah. Nope. Go directly to jail. At least.

Defence counsel John Scullion KC said: "The accused recalls feeling a sense of panic and describes feeling that something flipped in her mind that day."

That's the defense. These people have no shame.

He said that McGovern was "a vulnerable individual" who was introduced to cocaine...

The defence counsel said: "I think it is plain that she bitterly regrets her lifestyle when using cocaine and the impact of the drug on her personality, culminating in these offences."

Again, no excuse. Some murderers regret their actions...and she almost managed to promote herself to murderer anyway. Would it still be fine, if she'd succeeded it getting rid of the kid, but still regretted it?

He said that she had taken steps to deal with the drug problem that had blighted her life for several years and added: "She has had mental health issues throughout her adult life, issues with anxiety and depression."

Boo-hoo.

Mr Scullion said: "The author of the report confirms she displays shame and remorse for the pain and suffering she has caused, which, in my submission, is both *genuine and profound."

Whatever.

3
Kienan 3 points ago +3 / -0

You actually can't swing open the door and pepper spray someone who has not shown any hostile intent.

One caveat I would offer is, we don't know if that is what happened. It's pretty suspicious that we've only seen parts of her video. At least that's my understanding, although I haven't followed it closely.

But it's very possible there was more going on that we didn't see. Although, flipside, similarly to not seeing her full video...we know Nick has a camera outside his door, so if there was a preceding aspect to the altercation, it's odd we haven't seen his side of things. Again, to my knowledge, and someone correct me if I'm wrong.

30
Kienan 30 points ago +30 / -0

Apparently the 3 he killed were family members. Then he ran into someone else's house and killed 2 dogs

He got off fucking easy, with death by cop.

10
Kienan 10 points ago +10 / -0

Anyone with a brain can parse it and give him the benefit of doubt.

Well, then Crenshaw clearly doesn't have a brain, if he couldn't give a better answer to such a simple thing.

9
Kienan 9 points ago +9 / -0

How'd he lose that eye

Another ten year old asked him a mean question too hard. It's why he's so touchy.

21
Kienan 21 points ago +21 / -0

I don't care if the ten-year old called him a faggot zogbot pirate.

I mean...I would. That would be amazingly hilarious.

11
Kienan 11 points ago +11 / -0

this seems like a typical out of context gotcha.

The reaction clip, or the question? Because for me it doesn't really matter the question, the reaction itself is being bitchy to a little girl. That's extremely embarrassing, at the very least.

31
Kienan 31 points ago +31 / -0

"Don't question my faith."

If I wasn't questioning it before, I certainly am now, after you felt the need to lash out at a little girl for asking a simple question. Jackass.

Freaking fragile and embarrassing.

2
Kienan 2 points ago +2 / -0

So, what you're saying is, lobsters.

17
Kienan 17 points ago +17 / -0

I gotta echo everyone else here...who?

And just to fit in...she's a whore, or something.

1
Kienan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Name good jewish billionaires fighting against what the genocidal jewish billionaires are doing.

There might be some; nothing springs to mind, but I also don't keep close track on all that. It definitely seems stilted toward the 'pro-genocide' side, though, I'll give you that. And those fuckers are evil, no question.

If you can't do that, name any good jewish people fighting against what the genocidal jewish people are doing.

This one is nowhere near as cut and dry, though. There are definitely some Jews who are totally on-point on this. Plenty of Jews are anti-Zionist, and not all of them are even of the raging lunatic leftist variety. There are libertarian Jews, who are pro-freedom, pro-America, and staunchly anti-war, anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, and anti-genocide. I have some names in mind, but I don't really want to bring specific individuals into this; but there are absolutely Jews who get this at least 80% correct. And who are pushing the message and doing really good work.

There are Jews who (ridiculously) get labeled as antisemites and Nazis, for speaking out against the atrocities of The Jewish State of Israel™.

I think part of the issue on this is merely perception. Leftist Jews are largely assholes...but so are non-Jewish leftists. Rightwing Jews are often, well, traitors to the American right, frankly, because they're Israel first Zionists in it for their own ends. Not always, but there are a ton of them. But, again, a bunch of non-Jews are also neocon Zionist assholes. The uniparty is the uniparty, and there are Jews on both sides, being assholes. But there are also non-Jews on both sides, being assholes. Kind of how the whole thing works.

I have plenty of concerns, but to act like no Jews are legitimately anti-Zionist simply isn't true.

73
Kienan 73 points ago +73 / -0

Let me get this right...to protect Jews, the government just made it illegal to claim the government is controlled by Jews.

Also, denying or questioning the exact telling of history. Current history. Since it's changed a few times already.

Or of accusing Jews of being more loyal to Israel than "their own countries." I mean...what if they say openly that that's the case, and they're more loyal to Israel than where they are living? Is that still illegal? Can I not accuse Ben Shapiro, for example, of being more loyal to Israel than the US? He's said as much.

Also, since when does "the right to self-determination" come with a guarantee of an ethno-state...and how do I get in on that grift? Would certainly make things simple, if ethnostates were a yuman right.

And, uh...Jews did kill Jesus.

It's all so tiresome. But tell me again about the wonders of Judeo-Christian values. Also, the absolute arrogance (and, admittedly, massive power move, so props; impressive, if nothing else) that they managed to make it so other religions also have to acknowledge them as the Chosen Ones. I don't care if your own religion says you're chosen by God. That's pretty standard fare. But I don't have to believe it, and it's not hateful of me to refuse to state that you're better and more holy than I, because of your race. Absolutely ridiculous.

3
Kienan 3 points ago +4 / -1

What I'm getting from this is that anime avatar people are probably cringe extremists on one side or the other.

2
Kienan 2 points ago +3 / -1

Strange. I'm no expert - haven't even signed in to Twitter/X for years - but in linked tweets I often see leftoids whining about the racist and far right "anime avatar" people, and using the fact someone has an anime icon to discredit them.

11
Kienan 11 points ago +12 / -1

What's unfortunate is most of the anti-anime thing right now started on our side because Trannies loved using anime avatars (like all weebs do at one point), and so it just became "every negative thing about gays and trannies also applies to anime."

I don't agree. The whole "anime avatar" crowd are largely grouped as rightwing, and it's actually used as a slur by the retard left.

Yeah, autists (and thus trannies) enjoy anime too, but the "anime profile" people are largely right, and often even the actual "far right."

8
Kienan 8 points ago +9 / -1

It really is a shame, and I hope they win their fight...but I'm worried they won't. It will take a while, but unless they really push back, both anime and Japan will fall, at least eventually.

It's immensely frustrating to see entertainment medium after entertainment medium fall to the demons and locusts. And it's infinitely worse to see whole societies and civilizations fall to them. They are the Enemy, and must be stopped, before it's too late.

It's also retarded. The whole point of bread and circuses is to provide people with entertainment they can enjoy, to keep them from getting more engaged in...non-entertainment avenues. Why the fuck do these retards keep picking apart our entertainment, and making it complete devoid of enjoyment?

The left took a bunch of culture victories over the decades, but also a bunch of losses, especially recently. They should sit the fuck down and let things settle...but they can't. Which, if we're looking at the silver lining, I guess we should be grateful for. They'll keep going. They are incapable of leaving us anything to enjoy.

18
Kienan 18 points ago +19 / -1

More autistic than demonic.

Although some of the trannies are demonic.

Also, that tranny-Reddit-Beholder is...incredibly apt.

3
Kienan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, I'm not even saying all of those were Russia, but some almost certainly were. Other actors get in on the fun, and it's then easy to blame Russia.

And, yeah, not sure about the missile strikes, I agree that he needs to put up some evidence for that, or it's worthless.

2
Kienan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, you sure know a lot about Russian perfidy. Where do you get all this secret information?

I don't agree with everything he said, but it does seem like Russia likes killing their own inconvenient people. Fact? No. But very, very strong indications. It's not secret information; they're intentionally not very subtle about it, because that's part of the message. "Shame if something were to happen to you."

13
Kienan 13 points ago +13 / -0

CIA & MI6 special.

"Ukraine."

That was my first thought too. This at the very least, in my opinion, has outside intelligence backing. If Ukraine was involved, they likely weren't alone.

1
Kienan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Out of all the gay people I've known...almost all of them were raped as children. But that's a separate topic.

4
Kienan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, I left it vague on purpose, how I said it. Even if had Penny had directly killed him by accident, it was still Neely that put himself in that position.

5
Kienan 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Base jumpers don't deserve to die!"

view more: Next ›