Okay, so why don't we just exterminate every Japanese after WW2?
Because Japan offered their unconditional surrender. Until that point the United States was planning to invade Japan, with both sides expecting half the Japanese population to be wiped out by combat and starvation.
I don't think I've ever met anyone who legitimately believes he killed himself.
I think it's plausible, if he believed he wasn't going to get the same kid gloves treatment as last time. It's not even incompatible with him being silenced - the most plausibly deniable way of killing a prisoner would be to convince him that you're going to throw him to the wolves so that suicide looks like the easy way out.
I doubt it because of the timeframe. If it was finished in 2016 it would have been out the door before the TV show keeled over and died - at the latest, it would be in stores waiting to be released alongside the finale if you wanted to make a big gimmick out of avoiding spoilers.
While I don't know that it would fix the problem, I have my ideas for how I'd mitigate it.
One area of attack is no-fault divorce and abortion. You can keep your morning after pill, but surgical abortion on a healthy child in a healthy mother should not exist unless the guy who had her locked up in his basement is hanging from a tree outside. Anything less than that and you have to live with your mistake instead of letting your child die for it.
But it is about "hating women." He's observing the problem that literal rape cultures are self-sufficient, and we aren't. The challenge is how to get women to be mothers again without prostrating yourself before the pedophile prophet or taking up bride kidnapping.
I haven't read the specific demands, but that sounds like a bridge too far. Single player games should have that rule, but there are plenty of multiplayer games where the server is necessarily playing an important role and for the vast majority of your customers the opportunity to keep playing if you buy a new computer to host your MMO isn't a meaningful benefit.
It's socialist policies that allow criminality to fester instead of cleaning house. If the government is locking up criminals so they don't reoffend instead of letting the criminals run amok and prosecuting anyone who defends themselves, policy overrules demographics.
People in that thread are being retarded. The institute is shutting down because they got defunded and instead of selling people's personal information to the highest bidder like most organisations seem to do in their position, they're destroying it. They are not the enemy and they do not deserve blowhards saying that they should be killed or tortured.
I could make a lot of guesses. Democrats are more likely to be neurotic doomsday cultists who think fascism or climate change will ruin America for their children, Democrat counties are more likely to be crime-ridden cities with high costs of living, Democrats are of course more willing to kill their children or castrate their children or themselves. Republican counties apparently have higher divorce rates, but even that is in part because people in red states marry and have kids earlier in life.
You open the door because you thought you lived in a high trust society. If I had been the target, my front door would already be open by the time I got a good look at the shooter and realised my mistake - if I see flashing emergency lights out the window and hear the doorbell, I'm thinking "police" and not "assassin."
I believe so - I've seen that cited as an explanation for why conservative areas in the US have higher divorce rates than progressive areas.