I hope they lost more than with their Gamestop short with this one..
With this and the fact we have SO many reports of the inadequacy of security, this was planned beyond belief, it wouldn't surprise me if we find out the shooter was groomed by FBI.
It's also amazing that ALL of it fell apart like a house of cards by one simple turn of the head, God moves in mysterious ways huh..
Last I heard a representative of the firm called it an "accounting error" lol so they're gonna try to squirm on it and maybe pull off some "crying out in pain as they strike" while they're at it.
Lastly, Austin Private Wealth LLC, according to their website, directly supports the ACLU, ADL Austin, Shalom Austin, Jewish Community Center, Camp Young Judaea, Congregation Beth Israel, Austin Jewish Academy, and Hadassah.
This was a stupid tweet. End it after the second paragraph - "Blackrock bet against Trump's stock the day before a man in their promotional material tried to assassinate him" - and the argument is much stronger.
Because you've got to pace yourself. APW admitting on their own website that the evidence is real while they try to downplay it and Blackrock admitting on their Twitter account that the evidence is real while they try to downplay it is far more convincing if you don't dilute it with tinfoil hat stuff or try to spread the blame to as many potential sacred cows as possible. Don't mention cryptic death threats or the Jews, and stick to the corporation trying to get rich by killing the mascot of the company they just shorted.
Not just the games industry, the big investment banks like Blackrock own a controlling interest in pretty much all of corperate America. And they also all own large chunks of each other, making them effectively one large organization that antitrust laws somehow don't apply to.
The fact that the criminal appeared in Blackrock's ads, then does this to profit Blackrock, is total coincidence guys! It was an error! The algorithm did it! It was magical faerie interference!
I wanted to actually bring this up but I tend to have some kneejerk reaction about it and a lot of people are gonna post it soon anyway, you have my thanks for making this topic. There's no doubt then, his assassination was pre-meditated just like all the usual shenanigan these types commit.
3- someone tipped a NYT photog (same guy who shot the pic of Shrub on 9/11, btw) to set up his camera to do slow mo to catch a pic of Trump's head exploding.
With everything we've seen (thanks entirely to Elon buying Twitter) there's absolutely no way this whole thing wasn't a setup by the US government and the people who actually run things.
I've been saying that from the beginning, but people here keep stomping their feet and screaming "NUH UH!" Out of the incessant conspiracies and shadow dealings over the last decade, they suddenly believe this is the one that was organic.
Not knowing anything about how big players in the stock market work, I'm curious if these errors only go one way. Like if someone had filed that erroneous report, and then the stock went down, could they use the filing (with support from three letter actors) as evidence that the brokerage computer made an error and they are entitled to the money? Can trades be "undone" after the fact if you are powerful enough?
The London Metal Exchange reversed $12 billion of nickel trade all because it was on the wrong end of a short squeeze. Turns out the nickel contracts were backed by bags of rocks, not actual nickel.
When the LME was sued for breach of contract, the judge cited "systemic risk" as for why it's okay when they do it.
Get used to seeing those words more and more: systemic risk. Because being an overleveraged, degenerate gambler with other people's retirement money will destroy the entire system if they're actually forced to pay.
The correct holding amount was 12 contracts, or 1,200 shares— not 12 million shares, as was filed in error.
In submitting the required report for the second quarter of 2024, a multiplier was applied by a third-party vendor that increased the number of the shares by a multiple of 10,000 for all options contracts (not just DJT).
Lol. They're not even claiming one error. They're claiming two. A normal options contract is 100 shares. Typing 1,200 instead of 12 (neglecting the 1:100) for 1,200 shares is understandable if you were brand new to options - which no one at a fucking wealth management firm should be. But then they're also claiming that some third-party vendor made it 1:10,000. So they wanted 12 contracts for 100 shares each and instead asked for 1,200 contracts of 10,000 shares each.
The first "error" is hard to evaluate either way. The second one though... were all their options trades in that filing off by a factor of 100 (10k vs 100)? Or did it mysteriously affect only the one trade?
BUT if that option position never actually existed and everything in that filing just misrepresented their actual positions by x100... partially plausible, but still looks awful bad.
If the Congressional GOP weren't so cucked and useless they'd subpoena this company's CEO and the SEC chairman and start asking tough questions under oath.
I guess there is a reason why the north koreans would unalive the perp and multiple generations of the perp's family and several branches of the family tree.
My hunch is that this is related to the alleged Iranian assassination plot, for which there was intel that insiders could have obtained. Especially the types of insiders that are alleged to be behind this investment front.
It is unclear if this Crooks doofus was involved, or was another branch of the same organizer or just a coincidence.
I hope they lost more than with their Gamestop short with this one..
With this and the fact we have SO many reports of the inadequacy of security, this was planned beyond belief, it wouldn't surprise me if we find out the shooter was groomed by FBI.
It's also amazing that ALL of it fell apart like a house of cards by one simple turn of the head, God moves in mysterious ways huh..
Last I heard a representative of the firm called it an "accounting error" lol so they're gonna try to squirm on it and maybe pull off some "crying out in pain as they strike" while they're at it.
Ah, the errors that only go one way again
This firm also donates to a lot of jewish organizations. Check it out.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240717231041/https://austinprivatewealth.com/in-the-community
Hopefully this prompts Trump into recanting his zionism.
It won't. He married his kids to jews.
The chutzpah of "we're going to clandestinely alter the course of history... but while we're at it, why not make a bit of profit?"
Remember when airline stocks were shorted before 9/11 lmao me neither, that's just alex jones style bullshit.
EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
This was a stupid tweet. End it after the second paragraph - "Blackrock bet against Trump's stock the day before a man in their promotional material tried to assassinate him" - and the argument is much stronger.
Lol why is it stupid? There is a lot of relevant information
Because you've got to pace yourself. APW admitting on their own website that the evidence is real while they try to downplay it and Blackrock admitting on their Twitter account that the evidence is real while they try to downplay it is far more convincing if you don't dilute it with tinfoil hat stuff or try to spread the blame to as many potential sacred cows as possible. Don't mention cryptic death threats or the Jews, and stick to the corporation trying to get rich by killing the mascot of the company they just shorted.
Not just the games industry, the big investment banks like Blackrock own a controlling interest in pretty much all of corperate America. And they also all own large chunks of each other, making them effectively one large organization that antitrust laws somehow don't apply to.
The fact that the criminal appeared in Blackrock's ads, then does this to profit Blackrock, is total coincidence guys! It was an error! The algorithm did it! It was magical faerie interference!
I wanted to actually bring this up but I tend to have some kneejerk reaction about it and a lot of people are gonna post it soon anyway, you have my thanks for making this topic. There's no doubt then, his assassination was pre-meditated just like all the usual shenanigan these types commit.
The same company that had the shooter in their commercial also were betting on his death the day before it happened.
That's two pieces of information that alone would be "huh, interesting" worthy, but together, they're suspect.
Some higher-up is currently extremely mad that
1- The shooter missed.
2- His collegues couldn't resist using their knowledge of the planned assassination to make some quick cash by shorting Trump's companies stock.
Their greed is a weakness.
3- someone tipped a NYT photog (same guy who shot the pic of Shrub on 9/11, btw) to set up his camera to do slow mo to catch a pic of Trump's head exploding.
With everything we've seen (thanks entirely to Elon buying Twitter) there's absolutely no way this whole thing wasn't a setup by the US government and the people who actually run things.
I've been saying that from the beginning, but people here keep stomping their feet and screaming "NUH UH!" Out of the incessant conspiracies and shadow dealings over the last decade, they suddenly believe this is the one that was organic.
They are saying it was an error:
https://x.com/marionawfal/status/1813842783783801161
If you want to verify this for yourself, they posted it here.
Not knowing anything about how big players in the stock market work, I'm curious if these errors only go one way. Like if someone had filed that erroneous report, and then the stock went down, could they use the filing (with support from three letter actors) as evidence that the brokerage computer made an error and they are entitled to the money? Can trades be "undone" after the fact if you are powerful enough?
The London Metal Exchange reversed $12 billion of nickel trade all because it was on the wrong end of a short squeeze. Turns out the nickel contracts were backed by bags of rocks, not actual nickel.
When the LME was sued for breach of contract, the judge cited "systemic risk" as for why it's okay when they do it.
Get used to seeing those words more and more: systemic risk. Because being an overleveraged, degenerate gambler with other people's retirement money will destroy the entire system if they're actually forced to pay.
Lol. They're not even claiming one error. They're claiming two. A normal options contract is 100 shares. Typing 1,200 instead of 12 (neglecting the 1:100) for 1,200 shares is understandable if you were brand new to options - which no one at a fucking wealth management firm should be. But then they're also claiming that some third-party vendor made it 1:10,000. So they wanted 12 contracts for 100 shares each and instead asked for 1,200 contracts of 10,000 shares each.
The first "error" is hard to evaluate either way. The second one though... were all their options trades in that filing off by a factor of 100 (10k vs 100)? Or did it mysteriously affect only the one trade?
BUT if that option position never actually existed and everything in that filing just misrepresented their actual positions by x100... partially plausible, but still looks awful bad.
If the Congressional GOP weren't so cucked and useless they'd subpoena this company's CEO and the SEC chairman and start asking tough questions under oath.
There comes a point where their assets must be siezed as terrorist organizations
Well it is in Texas. Hopefully their Attorney General will step up when the Federal investigators inevitably try to sweep this under the rug.
What is considered a terrorist org in Texas? Blackrock?
I guess there is a reason why the north koreans would unalive the perp and multiple generations of the perp's family and several branches of the family tree.
It's all coming together...
The shooter in the BlackRock ad... of course...
My hunch is that this is related to the alleged Iranian assassination plot, for which there was intel that insiders could have obtained. Especially the types of insiders that are alleged to be behind this investment front.
It is unclear if this Crooks doofus was involved, or was another branch of the same organizer or just a coincidence.