Incorrect definition. Lacking complete substance, purposefully misleading, lacking any effort in creating the tweet. And made specifically for the captive audience of that twitter account. That post, too, is goyslop, even though it is not a processed nor fast food.
I like "swords and planets" sci-fantasy, but it's a rare genre. I'd like a turn-based tactics SRPG based in the genre. Full on noble-bright. Bad guys are bad. Good guys are good. With roguelite elements to it! If Embrace Of The Fog can prove that roguelike grid-based turn-based tactical RPGs can exist, then it's only a matter of making such a concept in the genre idealized, with a proper story and polished gameplay and animations.
D&D has magic. If you're infirm in some way, it's highly unrealistic: Peasant farmers didn't have time for that kind of thing, and the rich would simply solve the problem with magic.
Can't use his name in the headline, though, wouldn't want to put a psychopathic murderer at risk.
"She laughed at me? We'll see who's laughing soon! I'll control her by cursing her and taking all her free will!"
"Oh no! How evil!"
"I'm also a 6-foot-6 billionaire with a footlong schlong!"
"Oh no! How spicy!"
One clever one I've seen is a huge captcha box, a static captcha, that says in captcha-font "put in the name at the top of the website". On a fandom forum webpage that had a self-refreshing banner character up top that changed on webpage refresh.
Also worked as a basic reading comprehension and intelligence test.
Needed more space for the MMIWG2SGLBTQQIA+BBA+MAP+ colors
"The European Parliament"
But remember, they're nothing like the USA, they're definitely totes independent nations that have free will of their own.
Beep boop. Don't think, just shoot at the targets the AI tells you to.
Any country that would blindly accept someone from Canada... Is probably a country that you'd define as "pure junk".
Your existence denies your aspiration. Because a good country wouldn't accept someone just because they don't like their own country.
That dastardly vehicle! If only it had a driver in it that could have directed it away, maybe it wouldn't have been shot.
Oh no! Anyways...
Foreign aid should only ever (and only once everything at home is sorted) be in the form of direct literal foodstuffs, and MAYBE wood or rebar beams.
Of all items to give, cash should be the LAST item on any list, since logically speaking, they'd just give the cash away to get some other item that could have been provided in the first place, in a more timely manner.
Food take too long to get there, somehow, so you need to buy from a closer location? Sure, WE buy it from a closer location, and say "yeah, just deliver it to the feelsbad nation.". You STILL don't need to give cash. Ever!
Physiognomy is real. AI face recognition, however, is not.
Yes, "just". Because bail bond sellers/facilitators will cover bail bonds at tiny percentages of the total. It's perfectly likely the "bail" they'd actually pay is 5k.
It's plentiful, sure, but the request "I'm blatantly underage. I want illegal shit" literally happens multiple times per day. You're advocating for every single worker to be fired, and no one ever re-hired, because their employment would last all of 30 seconds before they encounter someone wanting to buy illegal material.
Why do you want to punish the innocent and the employed, instead of just actually punishing the criminals (both the "teens" and those seeking illegal materials).
It's literally their job to ID people, and deny those underage from buying specific shit. That's basically the entirety of their job, since self-checkout would do the rest.
Nothing wrong with thinking that a blatant criminal wouldn't have been convicted if a black person were on the jury. Plenty here ALSO think that they'd 100% in-group preference.
What's wrong is thinking that such a result is anything but a travesty and an abomination of society and justice.
If they were truly "color blind", they'd see [entity of unknown skin color] pledging to judge people of [skin color] solely based on [skin color], and want all those people jailed, extirpated, deported, or generally removed from society.
There's been (for women, who courts GREATLY favor, but still) clear-cut cases of obvious first-degree murder where they get off with two years, plus chance of early parole. A good lawyer wouldn't theorize that the victim attacked his client's knife using the victim's chest.
Then again, a GREAT lawyer may purposefully fumble the case ridiculously, to get the public riled up, and force a political pardoning situation for a clearly guilty person.
Mental inability or insanity should automatically result in the harshest penalty possible for any listed crime. A sane person can live and learn. A sane person won't generally do wrong things unless strongly prompted to. A sane person can reach better circumstances. Any placation you want. But an insane person can't. If he's mentally deficient, maximize the penalty, because he WILL do it again: He's insane, after all.
Great Filter theory:
Any species that gets intelligent enough and cooperative enough to make space-faring feasible, gets too empathetic, and gives too many entities ruling rights ("voting") out of feelings or virtue instead of merit or rationality, which cascades into corruption, and inevitable societal collapse. It happens without fail.
And your thinking is very linear, too.
There's enough loose theory that we can send "simple" data back in time. Simple in this case being "existing, or not existing". Or in other words, 0, or 1. Binary code. An AI needs not travel linearly, in example, it could travel along a time axis as well as a space axis, in order to expedite getting where it needs to be... If there's something on the other side to recompile it. Which there isn't yet. But the moment that there IS, infinite visitor reality collapse is a worst-case-scenario, but more likely is faster-than-time travel of information only (so, an AI's programming/a mind-file-scanned "self"), but only for a singular binary code flow at a time per black hole.
Faster than light travel IS possible. Just not for humans.
God can do it.
God made us in His image, but not in His ability, alas.
It's not a techy informant, it's a gambling website that lets you bet on politics. They're letting you know a new series of bets are going to be available concerning this new event.
It IS equity. The financial definition of the term, not the social justice one. Words have multiple definitions in English. Equity is retained earnings and shareholder stock valuation.
The communal vaginas of The People shall be shared in the Commons: To each according to their need.