1
nuggetpatrol 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Here's why anything Trump does it bad"

... it just is okay? We haven't spun a plausible lie from this yet just give us like 15 minutes.

Go out of business. For your own good. By your own hubris.

6
nuggetpatrol 6 points ago +6 / -0

Back in 2002, or maybe 2003, the creator of The Boondocks said "They don't care, and it's your fault" so eloquently, that the audience he was speaking to didn't even speak up and disagree, they just got angry that he hit the nail on the head so hard that it drove the nail back into the wood.

Why do I bring that up? Aaron made a great point.

People, in this example I bring up, white people, are tired of hearing about your struggle and your plight. Your moral currency has run out. If we have to watch you get all the gimmies and have it all, and yet have to hear about how horrible you have it, while most of us are just in worse shape... We don't want to hear it anymore. But more importantly, we don't care anymore.

So if I have to hear about how we're not doing enough for you, while you don't give a rat's ass about anyone that isn't you? Yeah, you can forget that shit real quick.

I wanted to find the full clip that aired on CSPAN2, and not one with overly dramatic music playing, but I think the original is gone or lost, and all that is left are these clips. Anyway, here's a somewhat tolerable clip. Sorry about the music, I didn't add it.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/KeQPw_Oeh-M

2
nuggetpatrol 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm going to point to this the next time someone says diversity doesn't mean less white people.

Because that's exactly what it means.

13
nuggetpatrol 13 points ago +13 / -0

Didn't Hulkmania already run wild on Kotaku?

This is just going to sweep up any remaining funds.

I literally don't want either side to win, and for them to litigate themselves into insolvency. As unlikely as that is.

Kotick has way deeper pockets than Kotaku and Gizmodo combined. So we'll see what happens.

19
nuggetpatrol 19 points ago +19 / -0

The thing they have not and likely cannot understand is that when the world gets better, we have to drag them along to it, too.

So everything will get better, except their little pre conceived notions that have been drilled into them by other cultists on the left will be tested and dismantled.

And they can't stand that.

16
nuggetpatrol 16 points ago +16 / -0

A lot of what I learned in school turned out to be bullshit. So things like this don't surprise me.

19
nuggetpatrol 19 points ago +19 / -0

Same ideals as Trudeau, but less black face and more potential pedo. But I think Trudeau did a bit of that himself when he was an english teacher.

So basically, the liberals rigged their own internal election to let go of Trudeau and introduce Trudeau 2.0. This one's got a new hat.

22
nuggetpatrol 22 points ago +22 / -0

I'm not trying to tell you what to do, but I have to ask. Why do you still have lefty friends?

You know they'd drop you like a stone the second they smelled anything right wing from you. Even if you don't feel it's anything remotely right wing. You're talking with and potentially hanging around with people who feel like if you sneeze and lean right one too many times to do it would be enough to cut you out of their lives.

I could only walk on eggshells for so long around them before I was cast out like a leper. It'll happen to you too sooner or later.

8
nuggetpatrol 8 points ago +8 / -0

There are a lot of naturally pretty people. But it doesn't typically come just from looks, because, as someone already stated, they always have some minor imperfections. Everyone does.

I know you can't fuck a personality. But a personality will rip your heart out and steal half of everything you own if you're not careful.

56
nuggetpatrol 56 points ago +56 / -0

The analogy doesn't even work.

The king wanted more tax on dry goods such as tea to the settlements. They felt that if they had to pay more for the same things, they should get a say in how they are governed. "no taxation without representation" When the King said no, that's when they threw it into the harbor.

DOGE is eliminating government spending on things that give little to no benefit to the country. Something Elon Musk himself is not actually doing, but he's the figurehead, so they hate him for it. Conflating dumping tea into the harbor with setting fire to highly toxic electric car batteries is really dumb.

Note that appeals to emotion, specifically hatred really rile these fuckers up.

11
nuggetpatrol 11 points ago +11 / -0

They tell you right on signs not to feed animals because they'll lose their hunting and foraging instincts and will rely on people. And when they don't get the food they need, they'll starve, having unlearned all that they knew. And it only takes a few generations for that to take hold.

I wonder if that relates to people at all. You just prop them up with money forever and hope the problem solves itself without doing anything about it. And when you teach them to do it for themselves, they fuck it up anyway and lose everything like that documentary Empire of Dust, where the asian dude from the "It's all so tiresome" meme comes from.

2
nuggetpatrol 2 points ago +2 / -0

ctrl + f top gun. Okay, someone mentioned Maverick. That was a good one.

ctrl + f Godzilla. Okay, minus one has also been suggested. Also pretty good.

ctrl +f The Killer. Okay, good. Excellent choice and great taste in movies.

That's pretty much it. I've been stuck in overwork mode so I haven't been able to do much movie watching.

And while I haven't seen it yet, Sonic 3 is getting good reviews on this very page, so it has to be at least somewhat good. I'll probably catch that on the weekend.

23
nuggetpatrol 23 points ago +23 / -0

They're setting fire to electric cars, burning the places to get them, and all because of one guy. But they're the envirmentally friendly ones.

The little kids that mine the rare earth materials to make the batteries? Who the fuck cares about that atrocity when someone said something I didn't like.

When the right attacked budweiser, they didn't burn down the breweries, they just stopped buying the beer.

12
nuggetpatrol 12 points ago +12 / -0

Before I conflate this with an actual federal election, as far as I know, only liberal party members (the ones that weren't DQ'd) were allowed to vote on this.

So it seems to me like those disqualifications were in specific districts to prevent people from voting in any way but exactly what they wanted to happen.

ie: those they knew were going to vote for Carney got to vote. And those who were going to vote for someone else got just enough DQs to make carney the easy win.

4
nuggetpatrol 4 points ago +6 / -2

Having fun in a not Matt Walsh approved way means that it is obviously incorrect, and is worthy of scorn and derision.

But yeah, spending nine months attempting something is bad. I hope it didn't take him nine months to make a mocumentary to answer a question that anyone with a functioning brain already knew: what is a woman.

8
nuggetpatrol 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think I vaguely remember that study. They came to the conclusion that if you don't like it you're a bigot, but they couldn't show correlation = causation in the same study. They just really hoped you wouldn't notice because of the bigotry they really want you to have.

So basically, it's a https://files.catbox.moe/kl0ky2.jpg

2
nuggetpatrol 2 points ago +3 / -1

The wave we are most familiar with started around 2012.

It got heavier in 2014.

Then they went absolutely warp speed in 2016 with it when they realized it wasn't working, so they had to make it seem normal at all cost.

If you give them the ammunition that it was always there chud just accept that you were wrong about everything and it's always been leftist/social justice/etc, you too are using today's lens to look at the past and examine what is and what is not acceptable.

There might be echoes of similarity in the past, but that was the stand out, not the norm. I am willing to bet people would have noticed this bullshit much earlier if it was everywhere and all the time, instead of just one or two episodes in a long running show.

It was meant more of a way to make a character feel more accepted or more encouraged. If you conflate the "If you try, you can achieve it, we believe in you" mantra episodes from shows of the 50s and 60s with their socjus, that's unhelpful. It was meant more to motivate people to be more independent and self reliant, critical thinking.

4
nuggetpatrol 4 points ago +4 / -0

There has to be a correlation about those with the shittiest attitudes that make the worst decisions that they don't feel responsible for.

view more: Next ›