2
TheOpiner 2 points ago +2 / -0

When British native men are told to "fight for democracy" by being drafted to Ukraine for Starmer's "peacekeeping mission", you can bet this "army" of "middle aged women" will somehow exempt themselves from going.

1
TheOpiner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Their idea of sorting out the dating market is expelling 70-80% of men out of it, sleeping with the top tier men then complaining on TikTok that he won't commit or be a father to their child.

So you'll have to excuse me if I doubt their credentials to "sort everything out" when they can't even keep a "good man" around.

22
TheOpiner 22 points ago +22 / -0

Sit back with popcorn and enjoy the show, I guess. If UK peeps think US sites blocking them because of GDPR is annoying, wait until this rolls out.

We still haven't figured out the consequence that websites accessible in the UK will also legally have to ban VPN users to prevent any UK citizen from bypassing the verification.

14
TheOpiner 14 points ago +14 / -0

If they are paid more then and the BBC is actively engaging in discrimination that is a crime under equal pay legislation and the Equality Act and the BBC needs to be taken to court. Because we know if it was the other way round, they'd be in court quicker than they could blink.

3
TheOpiner 3 points ago +3 / -0

The alternative is to have everyone forced to work and micromanage every minute of their day to maximise revenue. And then remove those who are not maximising revenue from society as dead weight. There's a saying - "all work and no play makes Jack a dull boy". Even the likes of Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos need time to decompress and wind down.

3
TheOpiner 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't know why this got voted down but it is technically correct. The people who get on in their careers and success network with other successful people (like attracts like) but you need those connections. They also come from wealthier families. Are taller (men six feet or above only make up 14% of the population but make up over half of CEO's) and there is the halo effect where people want to associate with attractive people. Even the personality aspects behind hard work are predominately (70%) genetic. Some of the most successful entrepreneurs that I know of dropped out of education. So much so, that was a core feature in a Simpsons episode regarding entrepreneurship.

You can be inherently intelligent and smart but without any of those things, you'll have worse outcomes in life.

8
TheOpiner 8 points ago +9 / -1

I've a better idea and it's what I follow in life. I will do what I like as long as it causes no harm to anyone else or impedes on their private property. In return, I will not compel you to do what I do and leave you be. And no, The Religious Hippie being offended by my choice of hobbies in life is not "harm".

20
TheOpiner 20 points ago +20 / -0

Religious Hippie: "Men who do their own thing and have hobbies I don't like are man-children".

Also Religious Hippie: "Men who do as I say and don't do their own thing give me the "ick".

15
TheOpiner 15 points ago +15 / -0

Does any of those hobbies make income to her? If not, it will give her the "ick" and will be deemed a low quality hobby for a low quality man.

7
TheOpiner 7 points ago +7 / -0

The problem is that those hobbies are not jobbies that make income. The only thing they want you to do that involves labour is employment for their benefit and chores for their benefit. Anything else gives her the "ick".

2
TheOpiner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Biological sex is determined by gamete production. Egg = female. Sperm = male. If someone has none or both (ie. hermaphrodites), then we go by the 23rd set of chromosomes to see if it contains a Y chromosome. If so, male. If not, female. It is that simple.

If you have 35 minutes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udLKnSDz0mM

I had to unsubscribe from a YouTube electrical engineering channel a day or so ago because there were two videos, one attempting to justify how having multiple X or Y chromosomes is somehow now a new gender and then a second video declaring that anyone who disagrees wants transgender people removed from society. That's not what I subscribed for.

6
TheOpiner 6 points ago +6 / -0

TL;DR

  1. "Preoccupied With Being Cheated On" - Refuses to accept being a cuck in the neo-polygymous world we find ourselves in.

  2. "Deflects and Puts Blame Onto Others" - Be conditioned to take the blame for everything.

  3. "Raises His Voice To Get a Point Across" - Shut up and take it like a good cuckold plow horse.

  4. "Has Difficulty With Taking Criticism" - It's criticism when she dishes it out...

  5. "Justifies Poor Behavior by Using Past Events and Perceived Slights" - ...when you do it, it's "coercive abuse".

  6. "Has a Tough Time With Emotional Conversations" - Be emotional but also don't be emotional because that gives her the "ick".

  7. "Triggered by Perceived Emotional Distance" - get comfortable with being cuckolded.

  8. "Acts on Emotions Without Thinking" - you're going to need all your logical skillset for horse plowing to fund your wife and her boyfriend.

  9. "Leaves Confrontations Before Reaching a Resolution" - You are responsible for everything

  10. "Seeks Constant Validation" - Good plow horses and cuckolds are seen and not heard.

I know it's a long post (ironic for a TL;DR) but you can boil it down to be a cuckold, a obedient plow horse and shut up.

5
TheOpiner 5 points ago +5 / -0

The UK Government is now reviewing terror legislation that will target "lone individuals" - a,k,a, incels - in order to "prevent terrorism and keep the public safe" from "misfits" and "loners". So it turns out the Government is going to legislate not just kids, but everyone, who is a "weirdo".

1
TheOpiner 1 point ago +1 / -0

It won't be long into the bill's journey that the "student" and "in schools" part is taken out.

6
TheOpiner 6 points ago +6 / -0

When you understand Briffault's Law, you understand society. Even in the countries passport bros have gone to, Briffault's Law still applies.

4
TheOpiner 4 points ago +4 / -0

Passport bros are in for a nasty shock as the feminist ideology gets spread in the countries they flee to thanks to social media.

5
TheOpiner 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's what I thought. It would be like an American coming to the UK, saying something illegal and then attempting to claim that as they're American, they're not under UK jurisdiction and can say whatever they like. I suspect judges would throw that argument out in a second.

Either that or he's found a loophole in a law that is now ripe for exploitation (I suspect it won't wash).

view more: Next ›