If the BBC has an exemption than so does everyone who doesn't have children or any contact with them.
This is just absolute authoritarianism and will collapse in a few years when all business with the UK dries up.
A forced wall around the Internet is no Internet and either the whole country will go to jail or there will be riots due to those at Number Ten abusing it as they see fit.
Why don't they try this out only on MPs for the first year and if that works without a hitch then try it on all public figures like the justice system employees, healthcare and education workers too. One all the best brains feel that it works and is not likely to send an innocent person to jail they can deploy it to the hoi polloi.
And before they do any of that why don't they see how much 'harm' the BBC has done to children over the years. I mean that's provable and also ties into their current Prime Minister.
Are the ADL thinking 46% are rookie numbers?
And only 1 in 5 haven't heard of an event that is particular to 1 country at a particular time period?
I'm pretty sure we could easily put that to 3 in 5 if we count China, India and Africa in these global numbers.
I've no idea who was keeping the books with the numbers but mass mind enslavement is very communist and not at all something that I support.
But I'm still curious as to how and why TikTok is popular and so I clearly know very little about people.
Sure thing sugartits.
So, you'll have been here for almost a WHOLE HALF YEAR soon.
You enjoying yourself?
Stay on target numbnuts. You've got a good thread title with a decent message to share. Keep your amazing educational system's output to an absolute minimum and maybe you'll be here in another six months.
You'll be reordering AC: Shadows and thinking about getting a mortgage with that daft bint soon enough and wondering where to invest your tiny savings now that Bitcoin is Gen-whatevers shitting on your chances at success.
Keep the hunger but use your brains to think about how you'll eat tomorrow.
Everything around you is because of those countries you state. Will their people be so kind when the power is with them?
It breaks my heart that you have to use a device made by these imperialist bastards to communicate with me and live in a system inundated with dividends from their barbaric economy just because capitalism took full advantage of communism.
I prey that trade unions look favourably upon you and that capitalism will rise for the people once more.
I'm saying (Not trying to) that enforced sales upon the largest population of the planet at the time of its release made this particular book the number one 'bestseller' in the world so far.
The same way that John Lennon saying that The Beatles were more popular than Jesus was empirically correct too even though the ratio to impact margins were far off.
If facts aren't your forte then perhaps ambling into conversations requiring them shouldn't be your thing.
I happen to like China. I also happen to like the US. I think they are good for each other.
That said, a Biden in China or a Trudeau in the US would destroy that fragile relationship.
I'm holding off on seeing how the press react to this. If there's one "And that's a good thing!" you can guarantee that it's in the authoritarian pockets and not worth it (Not that I see the appeal of TikTok either).
Both Tate and Shapiro are showboaters looking for attention from a group that has endorsed neither.
They can both keep their OnflyFans/Brett Cooper models locked up and only on display for their benefit or they can fuck off back to whatever over-mothered hellhole they called childhood.
Male feminists, there's just no pointing out how deeply they are entrenched in modern media and all the wonky people involved it keeping it afloat.
Most important thing I've noticed is that New York Magazine and Vulture are sister publications by this advertising technique. The second up thing is that Lila Shapiro (The writer of this piece) is mainly focused on books and authors that talk about sex, gender and power dynamics (With the odd bit of CRT nonsense chucked in there too).
Now only the meat and veg...
...Well it is very long. So long that one might think that the author of the piece might want to be an actual author of fiction one day. But, critique on writing style aside, like any author in the making the fold from beginning to end is much more telling that the parts in the middle.
From the end:
Around 11 p.m., they wrote down their intentions for the year and cast the scraps of paper into the fire. Pavlovich had written that she wanted to “release the yoke of victimhood” and “invite in self-acceptance.” The next morning, she woke before the others, made coffee, cleaned the kitchen, and sat on the porch in the winter sun. “Am I happy?” she wrote in her journal. “No.” But she also noted that she wasn’t alone. “There is no need to feel abandoned anymore.”
From the start:
Early the next morning, Pavlovich wrote a diary entry about the easy intimacy she’d felt in Palmer’s sun-drenched home, where she’d read to Palmer’s son, who was 5 at the time, their limbs entwined. “The years absent of touch build up like a gray inheritance,” she wrote. “I’m hungry. I am so fucking famished.”
That's not to say that Neil Gaiman didn't fuck up. He fucked up royally but more for shagging the nanny with a burlesque background and family abandonment issues that being the domineering creep of a male feminist that always finds such 'victims'.
A man born from the upper echelons of Scientology, dabbled in writing for wank mags and eventually found footing amongst the geeks of the 1980's and 90's with comic book writing and fantasy novels turns out to be everything that 'feminists' 'hate' and project onto regular comic book and fantasy fans in order to feel more in control of their existence.
If only everyone could stop thinking with their genitals for a moment and hear that one wave crash against the shore with clarity.
And we cracked the "URL" joke before it was cool with a bigger body making the guffaw (The UN and C:).
The whole thing could have gone away with a quick empty promise to revamp policies.
But the CTL Left just couldn't get off their high horse and so we showed all the male feminists to be rapists and every DEI hire to be talentless opportunists.
And I still insist that we're not out of the tutorial area yet.
I've had days where it's given me problems too.
Just always good to point out little errors before they end up getting used against us by those who hate our guts :)