-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +4 / -6

Blaming porn for why men don't want women is a cop-out.

Nobody wants to be voluntarily oppressed.

I hope he's grown and matured, particularly as The Sisterhood™ will be the number one enemy of an incoming Trump administration.

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +3 / -5

The other side uses young boys as child soldiers.

Jewish/Israel

Yeah, that's your line. You don't have an actual logical reason to stand with women, so just project harder than anyone has ever projected before.

By the way...isn't it weird your female masters also hate Israel?

There has never been something as astroturfed as unity between us and them.

1
TheImpossible1 1 point ago +4 / -3

Predictable.

As I said in the comment. It's not an attack if it's completely factual.

It's not up for debate that women hold a bias against men, that's been confirmed by multiple studies.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +2 / -8

I didn't say she was responsible. I said that she could be the motive.

OF trash are a lesser evil than marriage, that doesn't mean I think either are a good thing. You can avoid OF people, you can't avoid jumped up natalist scum determined to "unite" everyone.

I'd like to ban both, they both prey on the naive who don't know women's nature.

I'd love to debate your dumbass where R16 doesn't apply.

Everything unity shills say will fix the problem has happened or is happening in South Korea and they have the worst situation.

Prosperity, racial homogeneity, natalist government.

None of it makes women better people.

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +7 / -11

His entire existence has been stating the blindingly obvious and siding with women whenever it comes down to it.

I think the last time he said something original was when he exposed quota hiring at Spirit AeroSystems. But even then, he said DEI, not female, which wasn't accurate. He did eventually admit they were all women after being repeatedly challenged.

-11
TheImpossible1 -11 points ago +5 / -16

Matt Walsh, like the other paid shill on the left, Richard Reeves, is controlled opposition who can't allow a consensus against women.

People say the Daily Wire shills for Israel - but when they had a chance to stick the knife into the feminist lobby over Palliestine support, they didn't take it. Because really, they serve women.

I'm curious when we find out about the huge payoff from a feminist lobbyist. It took a while for Richard Reeves to admit he was taking money from Melinda Gates.


Also, regarding Nala Ray - the reason that one was okay in his book, is because it serves the unity goal. The idea of preaching redemption for irredeemable feminist trash.

Did she give back the money from exploiting broken men?

-10
TheImpossible1 -10 points ago +1 / -11

Matt Walsh is one to talk about killing Republican momentum.

The polls have a Republican lead because the share of young men's vote for Democrats has dropped. Try shilling the crap he does, about unity with women and getting back together with them.

You will fucking lose.

And that should be told to JD Vance as well, because he's said some unity crap in the past that polls about as well as drinking fresh diarrhea.

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +1 / -3

What I mean by involved is that she wasn't part of plotting to assassinate President Trump.

It would still be important to find out the nature of their relationship.

0
TheImpossible1 0 points ago +3 / -3

The author had to put a BS disclaimer at the end of the paper that in-group bias doesn't inherently prove innate malice.

I read it, it reads like he had a gun to his head.

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +2 / -3

scriptwriter

It couldn't get more obvious.

What is Zelensky praised for most? His endless begging speeches - guess who writes them?

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +2 / -6

Do you really believe that?

I think it's cope. Nobody wants to admit what happened.

Women voted in droves for a treacherous man who promised an endless meat grinder for young men and had a female handler backing his every move.

Zelensky's wife is a scriptwriter.

0
TheImpossible1 0 points ago +5 / -5

The reason women support the war is that it supports feminist goals of reducing the male population and has absolutely zero risk to them.

It's why they get absolutely unhinged when Russia strikes outside of the frontline. Because their ilk are supposed to be shielded from the hell they supported.

Whatever you do, don't look up who wrote the bill creating the Crimea Platform in the Verkovna Rada.

0
TheImpossible1 0 points ago +5 / -5

Ukrainian women definitely did vote for this war. Zelensky was largely thrown into power by the women's vote after the female candidate was eliminated from the list.

They could have chosen to stay, they didn't, but they still gladly shill in support of the war. Because it's NOT their people dying.

2
TheImpossible1 2 points ago +8 / -6

the enemy will come to their homes

The enemy is already in their homes, partying while their friends are being blown up by drones.

I reserve a special level of disdain for Ukrainian women.

3
TheImpossible1 3 points ago +9 / -6

But it will result in women's bloodlust being lowered, because there's more collateral damage.

Mutually Assured Destruction is the only way to deal with genocidal cults.

If you could guarantee that women voting for war to kill us in would be the first drafted, you will see the difference in their votes!

They only like war because it does their dirty work for them - no need to kill all men when you can start an unwinnable war and run the meat grinder.

view more: Next ›