So when they talk about “sexualization” it seems they seem most upset with anything that is normal or with anything that a normal straight guy would like. A female who talks about how much of a slut she is on the other hand gets rave reviews
And this is literally the same musician who has a loooong running gag of acting out different sexual positions in her live shows and her mostly female audience go wild for it because it's addressed to them.
So yes it genuinely seems like the only problem they have with it is that this one is more for the guys
There are almost zero female artists in music who don't devolve into just sexual nonsense on stage, no matter what their "message" is. If they aren't chained to a piano, they will end up twerking.
The only difference ever was if men enjoyed it loud enough, then it became a problem. Women enjoying it? That's so wholesome that bands like the Jonas Brothers could get middle school girls masturbating in the auditorium and that was 120% wholesome until they sold "purity rings" to speak against it. Then they were evil and controlling.
Basically we have an over-sexualized society, but we have near Victorian levels of taboo on healthy sexuality, but Weimar levels of support for degenerate or unhealthy sexuality.
Who gives a fuck what these "folks" think about anything at all. This "article" is part attempt to tell the "folks" what they're supposed to think and part advertisement.
games and media in general went from being created for the male gaze.
Now they are created for the male gays.
Anything conventionally attractive has to be uglified. Anything conventionally ugly must be displayed as a display of defiance against the status quo.
Except none of us created the status quo, they're just angry at marketing and losing jobs to beautiful looking people because those agencies wanted the 1% of the 1% of people who look like that, and not a 3/10s most of the rest of us are.
And instead of accepting this fact and being okay with it, they had to upend society so they can feel better about themselves that anyone can be anything and to question it is the same as splitting open a live kitten and eating it in public.
So when they talk about “sexualization” it seems they seem most upset with anything that is normal or with anything that a normal straight guy would like. A female who talks about how much of a slut she is on the other hand gets rave reviews
And this is literally the same musician who has a loooong running gag of acting out different sexual positions in her live shows and her mostly female audience go wild for it because it's addressed to them.
So yes it genuinely seems like the only problem they have with it is that this one is more for the guys
There are almost zero female artists in music who don't devolve into just sexual nonsense on stage, no matter what their "message" is. If they aren't chained to a piano, they will end up twerking.
The only difference ever was if men enjoyed it loud enough, then it became a problem. Women enjoying it? That's so wholesome that bands like the Jonas Brothers could get middle school girls masturbating in the auditorium and that was 120% wholesome until they sold "purity rings" to speak against it. Then they were evil and controlling.
They despise heteronormativity, if you frame every complaint it lines up perfectly with queer theory.
Yes.
Basically we have an over-sexualized society, but we have near Victorian levels of taboo on healthy sexuality, but Weimar levels of support for degenerate or unhealthy sexuality.
I believe that is how it works
Whore gets naked for whore promoting media.
Who gives a fuck what these "folks" think about anything at all. This "article" is part attempt to tell the "folks" what they're supposed to think and part advertisement.
Slop
Unfortunately, normies.
It's why the average woman in the West is a whore.
Odd. If she had the same image on onlyfans, it would be “empowerment”.
"Our shaming hasn't worked.....yet."
>Article about thing
>No picture of thing
games and media in general went from being created for the male gaze.
Now they are created for the male gays.
Anything conventionally attractive has to be uglified. Anything conventionally ugly must be displayed as a display of defiance against the status quo.
Except none of us created the status quo, they're just angry at marketing and losing jobs to beautiful looking people because those agencies wanted the 1% of the 1% of people who look like that, and not a 3/10s most of the rest of us are.
And instead of accepting this fact and being okay with it, they had to upend society so they can feel better about themselves that anyone can be anything and to question it is the same as splitting open a live kitten and eating it in public.
More like fat, brown, bitter they/them lesbians.
https://www.instagram.com/p/DKzTgbUPIPW/?igsh=cmZpcGt5czliOTJ2
Pushing the line with what’s allowed, honestly this is quite impressive.