1
Adamrises 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can agree to that, but that's far more effective in text than in speech where doing so constantly will make you look far worse than them often unless the person already agrees with you.

4
Adamrises 4 points ago +4 / -0

We need to stop using "science" as they use it

This won't stop them from using it, and in fact grants them more credibility and power when we continue to use it properly as people assume they are also doing the same.

We are literally watching this happen in triple speed with the word "anti-vaxx" as literally any usage they have for it is now equal to any and all prior valid usage. That's why their word games are so effective, and conceding it to them is very dangerous territory.

6
Adamrises 6 points ago +6 / -0

Previously human mortality meant we were probably dead by 30/40

That's a widely held misconception made by completely bad statistics. Infant mortality was sky high in those days. But if you managed to make it a few years, you'd generally live until your mid 50s, which is where lifespans tapered off quick. By just doing low effort math you'd see a bad picture by keeping those infants in.

And while your 50s is still young compared to now, that's probably the intended age for humans to die in evolutionarily. Its right when we start to nosedive physically and mentally to a point where most would be outright useless in a society that was full of scarcity. We only push that back now due to incredibly increased nutrition and technology, but most still start that decline shortly after.

You'd still start young having kids because of how many died, but it was nothing to do with your own life expectancy. It was just always a gamble with every kid making it past their first few years, so you'd want to run the numbers as many times as possible to protect your future.

By polio.

Funnily enough polio, despite existing since prehistory and being noted in Egyptian times at some of the earliest, was only a minor endemic disease for human history. It wasn't until 1900 that that changed and it became the monster it was for a few decades.

Children back in the day didn't need fancy diseases to be their main cause of death. Most just straight died of colds or SIDS.

6
Adamrises 6 points ago +6 / -0

In essence I agree. The pedo screeching is a pet peeve of my own, but you can't even approach the moral crusade subject with most people without them accusing you of it too. And every dude ever who went to a public school knows that half of high school girls are fucking older men, so its not like its some pizzagate level conspiracy.

Its even funnier because pedophilia requires prepubescence. Puberty for girls starts around 8-11 in most of the West, so it is years off being a valid label. Still illegal and probably immoral, but they know the correct term hebephilia doesn't get that kneejerk emotional reaction out of people. Which is what they want, instant "you hate this person now" responses.

But that is the problem I think with making it a strict law, and one pushed hard by shows like Law & Order for decades, is that instead of being something people digest and understand, they just see a single line and diminish it to "THIS GOOD THIS BAD!"

4
Adamrises 4 points ago +4 / -0

Or, hear me out, we judge it on a case by case basis whether its morally repugnant and should be criticized if you are doing it. That's the benefit of not involving the law, you can look at a 14 year old and say "yeah she is mature enough for this to be cool" or "that backwards ass retard child cannot be trusted with this decision."

Which if you know, how it worked for that long long time. The father had control and approval over whether these things were acceptable without the government and its hard line stances.

14
Adamrises 14 points ago +15 / -1

One of the annoying parts about things getting worse is that a constant stream of normies finally "wake up" and think they are uncovering big revelations or catching major admittances.

And as they are brand new, they still think "call them on their hypocrisy!" and "debate them and prove them wrong!" are completely viable tactics, and will argue against any heavier action.

5
Adamrises 5 points ago +6 / -1

Previously, humans didn't need the law (aka the government) to define what was good and okay for them to do over every little aspect of their life.

Now apparently as long as the government says its okay, you should do it. Morals? Principles? Common decency? Nah big daddy government told me I can, so its good!!

11
Adamrises 11 points ago +11 / -0

And most importantly, most of those states (especially the ones in the OP) are quite difficult to live in. Most of the Liberal Migration Locations are basically urban cities that resemble nothing of their surroundings or uber rich tourist destinations.

The moment a hurricane, tornado, or extreme isolation hits them they would be crying their way back home.

8
Adamrises 8 points ago +8 / -0

It was, which is a shame because the concept behind it is super interesting and probably the best "asymmetrical multiplayer" of any that have come out.

Instead now we have Dead By Daylight milking every pre-existing horror IP they can buy.

1
Adamrises 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its a comic book so yes, but that problem predates wokeness.

At least it used to be "this other character who is already kinda popular is now a different hero."

7
Adamrises 7 points ago +7 / -0

Technews people have been low info shills for a long time. That's why they are always big on Alienware and Mac and brand new extremely unnecessary for their price parts.

I can't think of a market where the "our writers are paid for" is more obvious.

6
Adamrises 6 points ago +6 / -0

Don't worry though, they gave her nerdy glasses. And a ponytail!

Clearly this is the nerdiest most autistic black woman who ever lived, which is the prime demographic for Lego.

12
Adamrises 12 points ago +12 / -0

Lego stopped pushing kits for imaginative building a long time ago. Because once you have them, you don't buy more.

Now they only sell "build it yourself" models that are too expensive to let children play with.

8
Adamrises 8 points ago +8 / -0

And here I thought reading the title it would at least be interesting. Like "wear a maga hat and call me a nigger while you plow me" kinks.

Then again, that's like half of the black girls in America so its probably not that interesting either.

1
Adamrises 1 point ago +1 / -0

What changed? What made it suddenly palatable?

The internet allowing you to sell your body anonymously without your social circles getting effected. Which meant instead of the lower class trashy women being the only ones who were in the market, because they didn't have any shame to feel, now attention starved idiots could have their cake and eat it too. They could feel like whores, and not have any of the downsides to it.

Onlyfans provided a much lazier model over the cam sites prior. The same way Patreon did for general subscription payments. A simple idea that no one managed to make big until it finally blew up.

1
Adamrises 1 point ago +1 / -0

And you hate this setup, so what are you getting at? Also:

you never answer how child creation and raising will ever work in your creeds

I'm beyond curious how you think children will work in the world you desire.

7
Adamrises 7 points ago +7 / -0

“never talk to a woman about anything not business related”

And now you are purposefully excluding them. Which is also "discrimination" and grounds for a complaint.

They don't tell you that part in the training for a reason, but there is no winning.

1
Adamrises 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm so sick of seeing women go off on fucking maternity leave then never come back

If you are going to try and make a point about principles, you shouldn't throw in your personal emotional bias with it. Undermines your entire argument.

Assumedly unlike you, some of us don't work in sit down offices or with computers. We work in places where pregnant women are in serious danger of getting the baby damaged, and their deteriorating physical state gets extremely exacerbated by the work further hurting the child. Unless your future is to lock all women away in only the comfy, easy jobs while men do all physical jobs in the world this will always be the case.

Also maternity leave is majority used for the after part of the birth. You know, after a major surgery has occurred in which most people get time off. During which they also are supposed to bond with their child during crucial moments of the child's development to allow proper rearing of it.

You notice how I'm arguing about the safety and security of our children, instead of screeching blindly about my hate? Because you never answer how child creation and raising will ever work in your creeds. Also:

You've been conditioned by their propaganda to believe that they need help.

I was an MRA before you were even aware there was a fight to be had. Back when that was an extremist position. You should calm the fuck down.

4
Adamrises 4 points ago +4 / -0

Its not supposed to be a platform you run on. Its a platform you hold of not letting them pretend "I'm not like one of them, I'm a good one!" while still benefiting from its actions within a generation.

1
Adamrises 1 point ago +1 / -0

They literally need our support to make babies for us. You know, that thing that allows a man to continue his legacy into the future and have some value for all he has built, instead of letting it fall to ruin the day he dies?

Unless you believe only in unfettered hedonism as the only purpose for life, then we need them in some capacity and need to support them in some equal amount to bare our young. And if you are pro-unfettered hedonism, because then your goals would be exactly like them. Hatred and hedonism.

17
Adamrises 17 points ago +17 / -0

We will always be stuck providing for them. Unless we decide this is the last generation ever and sterilize every living person, we will always need them in our lives and they will always need our support. They spend close to a year literally losing the ability to support themselves for each child they pop.

Don't let your hate blind you to actual biology.

5
Adamrises 5 points ago +5 / -0

In a way its a minority because feminism has become so normalized in our culture that by definition basically nearly all women would be one. Unless they are openly willing to forsake their rights to vote and return to childrearing as their primary expected role, they are eating from the feminism table.

Its when they openly acknowledge themselves as feminist and begin activism that you know the hate is a prime motivator.

3
Adamrises 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. The problem is when you sell yourself as "Free speech" principled, but then go back on that to make money.

That's by definition "selling out" and removes the single reason people used your product in the first place, thereby making the ads useless anyway.

view more: Next ›