Its hard to take this specific defense seriously when it was him and his people who kept bringing it up so often that people expected him to release it.
Like, if they said nothing else about it after the nonsense in Feb, it probably would have just faded away. Instead they brought it up, spit on our face, and now try to run this.
It would be hilarious if there was a pile of data that everyone assumed had something in it, so they talked it up to high heaven. Yet nobody actually read it. When they finally did, they realized it was nothing, or what could have been something had already been destroyed.
Not saying that’s what happened, but it would be hilarious. Turns out that, like most political things, nobody actually read it and just acted like they did. They one upped each other over time turning it into something big when the whole time they had nothing.
I assume with Epstein, he was Mossad and we may have directed it all and that’s why they’re trying to drop it. Turns out it was mostly us doing it.
Obviously there's no data in the files. Do people really think the FBI would just sit on all this data that incriminates all the world leaders that intelligence services have and just let it sit there? That's a bank robber with a dollar sign sack level of simplicity in how you think the world works.
Whatever data was seized, the next day a man in a suit walked in and told the lowly guard on duty with that data that it had to "be transferred to a secure facility" and it was never seen again. Unless a lowly tech did a bradley manning and somehow copied it all it's gone. If there was "a list" it's been deleted.
Even if the "list" was deleted, some form of material has to exist to keep the blackmail operation ongoing. The Podesta files are adjacent to this and we saw those.
Yeah the most likely scenario always was the "list" was deleted before they even offed him, or sometimes around then. Why keep it beyond that point? For the sake of bureaucracy?
The only stipulation there is why the big talk up about literally having it and seeing it earlier this year, which would be an extremely stupid thing to do if it never existed. Unless he was right and it was a lot of talk without double checking that it wasn't a binder full of blank pages.
Yeah the most likely scenario always was the "list" was deleted before they even offed him, or sometimes around then. Why keep it beyond that point? For the sake of bureaucracy?
Blackmail for Israel. The whole point of the list in the first place and the reason Trump has done an about face.
Yet nobody actually read it. When they finally did, they realized it was nothing, or what could have been something had already been destroyed.
So? That's just a reason to fabricate something entirely, it's a fucking political deathnote effectively especially with the level of deep fake technology we have now days. Anyone you have a problem with? just create evidence that implicate them as paying to rape toddlers
I never believed anything would be released, because any sane conspirator would have destroyed this shit years ago, and the remainder would have done it months ago. Remember, Epstein died under Trump's first admin. He couldn't control it then, and he probably couldn't control it now.
I really didn't either, though I did hope he would be able to. Much like Hillary being arrested, its a stark reminder that this world really doesn't have justice in it and lots of truly evil people will simply get away with things because of reasons well beyond our control.
However, unlike a lot of his failures, this is one he himself constantly harped on and the doofuses he put in charge of places kept talking about being mere seconds from releasing it. After pulling shit like that, to try and pivot this way now is incredibly retarded of him.
There's no question that the pivot was a failure, and it might even be true that Bongino considered resigning because how the memos were handled by DOJ, not necessarily that it couldn't be released.
Shit like this is why I don't believe in justice at all. Like, I understand the concept, but since I don't accept the existence of God, and I don't accept objective morality (because clearly the blood-curdling atrocities of our age, as well as many others, were considered moral imperatives by the people who committed them), then I can't really accept the concept of justice as some universal, objective, thing.
I realized that, strategically, it would be better to pardon everyone involved in the Epstein Affair, so long as they told the truth. Punishing them for injustice is simply impossible in a fundamentally anti-moral civilization that we live in. Simply speaking the truth would be so damaging that the de-legitimatization of these institutional structures would be the closest to justice that we could get, only so that the rapes would stop happening. It's not really "justice" if the cop guns down a school shooter, it just stops the situation from getting worse, and the even is prevented from magnifying.
I genuinely think that if you charged each person involved, and guaranteed them a pardon for a public admission of guilt that would name names, and then kept following that chain of confessions, although justice could not be done for the victims, the institutional damage would be so severe it would be a good enough stand-in for it. Justice, like Mercy, can only come from a position of strength.
Its hard to take this specific defense seriously when it was him and his people who kept bringing it up so often that people expected him to release it.
Like, if they said nothing else about it after the nonsense in Feb, it probably would have just faded away. Instead they brought it up, spit on our face, and now try to run this.
It would be hilarious if there was a pile of data that everyone assumed had something in it, so they talked it up to high heaven. Yet nobody actually read it. When they finally did, they realized it was nothing, or what could have been something had already been destroyed.
Not saying that’s what happened, but it would be hilarious. Turns out that, like most political things, nobody actually read it and just acted like they did. They one upped each other over time turning it into something big when the whole time they had nothing.
I assume with Epstein, he was Mossad and we may have directed it all and that’s why they’re trying to drop it. Turns out it was mostly us doing it.
Obviously there's no data in the files. Do people really think the FBI would just sit on all this data that incriminates all the world leaders that intelligence services have and just let it sit there? That's a bank robber with a dollar sign sack level of simplicity in how you think the world works. Whatever data was seized, the next day a man in a suit walked in and told the lowly guard on duty with that data that it had to "be transferred to a secure facility" and it was never seen again. Unless a lowly tech did a bradley manning and somehow copied it all it's gone. If there was "a list" it's been deleted.
Even if the "list" was deleted, some form of material has to exist to keep the blackmail operation ongoing. The Podesta files are adjacent to this and we saw those.
Yeah the most likely scenario always was the "list" was deleted before they even offed him, or sometimes around then. Why keep it beyond that point? For the sake of bureaucracy?
The only stipulation there is why the big talk up about literally having it and seeing it earlier this year, which would be an extremely stupid thing to do if it never existed. Unless he was right and it was a lot of talk without double checking that it wasn't a binder full of blank pages.
Blackmail for Israel. The whole point of the list in the first place and the reason Trump has done an about face.
So? That's just a reason to fabricate something entirely, it's a fucking political deathnote effectively especially with the level of deep fake technology we have now days. Anyone you have a problem with? just create evidence that implicate them as paying to rape toddlers
I never believed anything would be released, because any sane conspirator would have destroyed this shit years ago, and the remainder would have done it months ago. Remember, Epstein died under Trump's first admin. He couldn't control it then, and he probably couldn't control it now.
I really didn't either, though I did hope he would be able to. Much like Hillary being arrested, its a stark reminder that this world really doesn't have justice in it and lots of truly evil people will simply get away with things because of reasons well beyond our control.
However, unlike a lot of his failures, this is one he himself constantly harped on and the doofuses he put in charge of places kept talking about being mere seconds from releasing it. After pulling shit like that, to try and pivot this way now is incredibly retarded of him.
There's no question that the pivot was a failure, and it might even be true that Bongino considered resigning because how the memos were handled by DOJ, not necessarily that it couldn't be released.
Shit like this is why I don't believe in justice at all. Like, I understand the concept, but since I don't accept the existence of God, and I don't accept objective morality (because clearly the blood-curdling atrocities of our age, as well as many others, were considered moral imperatives by the people who committed them), then I can't really accept the concept of justice as some universal, objective, thing.
I realized that, strategically, it would be better to pardon everyone involved in the Epstein Affair, so long as they told the truth. Punishing them for injustice is simply impossible in a fundamentally anti-moral civilization that we live in. Simply speaking the truth would be so damaging that the de-legitimatization of these institutional structures would be the closest to justice that we could get, only so that the rapes would stop happening. It's not really "justice" if the cop guns down a school shooter, it just stops the situation from getting worse, and the even is prevented from magnifying.
I genuinely think that if you charged each person involved, and guaranteed them a pardon for a public admission of guilt that would name names, and then kept following that chain of confessions, although justice could not be done for the victims, the institutional damage would be so severe it would be a good enough stand-in for it. Justice, like Mercy, can only come from a position of strength.
You say that like evidence has to be authentic, a lack of evidence is just inspiration for fabrication work.