2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is there a serious look at some of the claims around Sandy Hook and a summary? I haven't followed it much but I'm not even sure what's actually being claimed. I've seen the video of Parents laughing and joking before tearing up for interviews. Where does that fit into the overall picture?

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

That begs the question why the hell she was put into that position.

Alternative explanation. She was just picked as VP as a diversity hire by Biden and was never meant to do anything aside from offset the old white guy as president.

No-one wanted her but all the donations to Biden-Harris couldn't go to anyone else. Legally it's too big a hurdle to jump even for democrats at short notice. So it was either go with her and her Billion dollars, or pick someone else and start from $0.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tucker Carlson did a really good podcast recently with Charles Camosy a medical ethicist (A good one don't worry) and this was mentioned. Specifically when "Brain Dead" was invented as a term someone originally pointed out it was just done to make organ harvesting more popular and the creators basically went "Um Yup".

Interesting factoid, "brain death" is not an objective term.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've heard of the top one but some of these other ones sound like trolls.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Most prestigious outlets

Mentions CNN.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look at that picture and then look at Vega from street fighter.

You can't unsee that.

4
subbookkeeper 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fast. There's no other conceivable reason that zombies could be a threat otherwise.

13
subbookkeeper 13 points ago +13 / -0

This is why the civil rights legislation is a great example of something that you probably think is good but is actually communist.

The government suing on behalf of people based on disparate impacts which is "racism of the gaps" it's what ibram x kendi grifts over, except enshrined in law 60 years earlier.

It's the definitive refutation of "laws are downstream of culture" They may be, but that river 100% goes both ways then. It is proof that you can change laws and the countries culture will follow.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is actually a joke thank God and not a real ad, but I was completely taken in till the end.

12
subbookkeeper 12 points ago +12 / -0

Stop, don't touch me there.

That's my no-no square.

7
subbookkeeper 7 points ago +7 / -0

He gives up on his persona and immediately gets raped and stabbed for doing so.

I wonder what the director meant by that.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Domestic battery can involve literally anything including poking someone.

He's out already so I'm going with a case of "Gotta arrest someone" type deal untill proven otherwise.

Re his accuracy, he primarily works from tips and provides opinions. That's a take it or leave it type of deal. Just admit that you don't like him because he's a weirdo.

9
subbookkeeper 9 points ago +9 / -0

For those that may have been unaware, Darth Angelus is just a guy who's singlehandedly taking it upon himself to animate the Heir to the Empire book. It's not great animation wise and the voice acting is just him but it's a book faithful adaption. So despite the clunky animation and poor voice acting, it's still better than anything Disney has put out.

16
subbookkeeper 16 points ago +17 / -1

Man and here's me who never bothered to upgrade from DVD's to blu rays.

3
subbookkeeper 3 points ago +3 / -0

So the other positive aspect of "gouging" is that it encourages other people to also sell that as it's so profitable to do so. If you owned a helicopter for example, at a certain price you would make money by filling bladders with fuel and flying them in.

I'm for "gouging" for no other reason than there's no other word to describe it without the emotive label of "gouging"

And for reference, here in Aus, fuel normally ranges from the equivalent price of $5.86 to $8.36 per gallon. Diesel is normally about 10 to 15% more expensive.

There's also a hard cap on the price where it just becomes more feasible to kill the owner.

7
subbookkeeper 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's stakeholder capitalism, if your greatest source of revenue is investment and customers as #2 that answers your question.

The rest is probably blackmailed pedo's as Totsugeki said.

4
subbookkeeper 4 points ago +4 / -0

Even this idealised image is a degradation of family. You can't raise 7 kids with only 2 Parents, you need Grandparents as well.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Big L for posting it online

They actually said that. I don't think this is demoralising, I want more of it.

view more: Next ›