1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the searching for nuclear or something else material is the most convincing and logical explanation so far.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

There was a guest from a CIA whistleblower type on Tucker a while back where she said it was an open secret that it was a north korean "special forces" team (obviously china backed) to test out an attack on infrastructure, apparently the bullet holes were at specific non random locations and the security pictures showed them as being asian.

Imo an EMP/infrastructure attack is the Russian/China response to strategic nuclear exchange. A handful of nukes air detonated above the US plus a few key sabotage targets are far more likely to succeed than a soviet style strategic nuclear barrage.

4
subbookkeeper 4 points ago +4 / -0

If that's the case, that's incredibly rare to begin with, 10-15 years ago there was very few genuine pua's. I remember being younger and joining my local city lair and it was basically a dozen guys trying to work up the courage for a few hours each weekend with a couple of guys that just did it seamlessly. Cold approach is actually really hard. I think that's overlooked.

4
subbookkeeper 4 points ago +4 / -0

You two have been going back and forward when you could both just walk outside and look at the first 100 guys you see and judge for yourself.

6
subbookkeeper 6 points ago +6 / -0

Counterpoint:

Most guys weren't cold approaching even 10-15 years ago, because lets be real, it's hard. People did it because there was no other option, and the type of PUA approach dozens of Women in a session is limited to a fraction of a fraction of 1%.

Unless you have a pua mentor behind you physically pushing you, I'd wager no-one here has every approached more than 100 Girls in total. Most dudes would see a cute girl and talk to her specifically, nor shotgun approaching everyone.

I'm not sure if this was what OP was referring too. But as an example of that I know a dude from my pua days maybe 10-15 years ago, i saw him in a mall the other day randomly, doing what he was doing years ago. Walking around looking for chicks to cold approach. The guy has probably approached an appreciable percentage of the Women in my city over the years. There might be 10,000 Women that would have had the experience of being cold approached in my city, but only 1 Guy who has had the corresponding experience of cold approaching.

I suspect the original tweet refers to the more "normal" interaction of asking a Girl your into out in person though. And I think that's just a skill or lack of perceived skill about talking to chicks. There's no scenario thats realistic where asking a girl out and her saying no would lead to any life altering consequences if it was that in itself.

18
subbookkeeper 18 points ago +18 / -0

I've never seen yellowstone so take this with a grain of salt but I hate it with a burning fiery passion.

It's just woke propaganda, cowboys doing manly things who REALLY hate racism y'all is the show right? If you point this out the dude bros will point out "but it's a good show" which is one of the most smoothbrain takes I've ever heard. It's culturally and mentally toxic propaganda, the issue is not the entertainment value of the propaganda. That's like saying you'd let a drag queen fuck you in the ass because at least the show before was good.

3
subbookkeeper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Australians are not waking up. Whatever the situation is the answer is always "fark no mayteee" to that question.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

So basically the church positions are too liberal?

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

The trouble with firearms is that there is no option below "lethal force" so when tyranny comes slowly and creeping you can' do anything about it because there is no response that would be justified.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why do people say this like it's a magic spell that'll somehow make police go away?

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gta6 will make a billion dollars but it wont be as popular as GTA 5. GTA7 will be the one that has reduced sales.

4
subbookkeeper 4 points ago +4 / -0

it's sad whatever it is.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

imagine finding out that nancy pelosi benefits from insider trading.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

So I'm assuming he either wanted to get caught or just didn't give a shit if he was or not?

Controversial opinion: This isn't a conspiracy because it doesn't benefit anyone. "parasites simply had it coming" isn't a regime friendly talking point in anyway.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you read his "manifesto" where he explains the story and what he got? his wealth didn't help him at all.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

IIRC this was from a few years ago and Carl actually had a separate video as a disclaimer pointing out that yes it's funny but that he didn't humiliate her purposefully and was polite because these videos are important. Largely the left just doesn't do them since 2015/16 era and it's important to give them a platform to say this dumb shit, his point was that you don't actually have to savage them, you just ask a few basic questions to reflect on their beliefs and let them talk.

He was actually quite polite during the invitation and she actually thanked him at the end.

8
subbookkeeper 8 points ago +8 / -0

having "wealth" doesn't automatically mean you can spend boatloads of cash, and it wasn't accessing the care that was the problem.

7
subbookkeeper 7 points ago +7 / -0

There's no way it'll remain up if it's legit.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the stuff around his manifesto is true I'm weakly leaning to the opinion that he wanted to get caught.

No idea why he didn't just hand himself in or do some publicity in the meantime but who knows.

view more: Next ›