They are very racist and dirty. If you watch some street food videos, its disgusting as hell, hygenic wise. And we all see them hiring only their own when they get a position in a company and treat others like shit.
Is it stupidity or malice? I always choose the latter anymore. There’s no amount of stupidity in modern society that can’t or hasn’t seen the damage caused by mass immigration and “cultural assimilation”. The only explanation is she doesn’t care, she wants the continuation of the insanity because of the longhouse effect. This is another example of the feminist Iroquois longhouse I keep mentioning. She was told by her matriarchal structure that discrimination and discernment is bad, she then formulates an impenetrable mindset based around that belief. There’s no foundation of this belief, no scientific basis, no religious basis, no historical basis, but because it is pushed by the matriarchal structure it must be enforced.
When they don't know what they're talking about or get tripped up in an argument, they just talk louder and never stop talking. Or they just say "That's BS I don't believe that. Discussion over."
Assimilation is a myth. Always has been, always will be.
Ethnic groups adapt, and they adapt to the absolute minimum the larger society allows. It's why you still have identifiable ethnic groups scattered across America over a century after they came over.
Assimilation was always a nonsensical concept. You can not assimilate a Muslim to Christian values. It takes centuries to even get to a point where you can make minor assimilation between similar countries.
Yep, the common argument I see here about 12/60 is that it's all Whitey's fault for being racist to them. It's extremely rare to see some one denying the disparity exists at all. I think I've only seen it from Twitter randos and such.
What exactly is your 'conclusion'? That the US without blacks should be compared with Europe with immigrants?
If we're playing that game, I think we should compare Europe without immigrants to the US with blacks, so we're 100x safer rather than just 2-10 times.
P.S. Even excluding blacks, the US has a higher homicide rate and a lower life expectancy than Europe.
Homicide rate in the US is a bit lower than Europe if just a few of the black areas of Chicago, Baltimore, and a couple more are excluded - not even all black areas, just a handful.
It's pretty much that way for any metric, like schools or life expectancy or whatever. Exclude the blacks from the stats and America is freakin' amazing.
India is low on homicide for a brown country probably because of all the fennel making them into pussies.
Homicide rate in the US is a bit lower than Europe if just a few of the black areas of Chicago, Baltimore, and a couple more are excluded - not even all black areas, just a handful.
I mean, go right ahead and subtract FIFTY SIX percent from your homicide rate, and see lower than how many European countries it is. I'm guessing zero, but you might land yourself on the west side of Albania and Belarus.
Don't get me wrong, we suck too! But I despise this special pleading from Americans. Don't you think we'd like to exclude the 80% of crimes and murders that are committed by Muslims and immigrants? Why do you get to exclude blacks, who have been there for centuries, why we have to include Muslims who just arrived on a boat and started a-raping?
It's pretty much that way for any metric, like schools or life expectancy or whatever. Exclude the blacks from the stats and America is freakin' amazing.
In 2020, white life expectancy in the US was 77.4 years, according to the CDC.
Bulgaria, Slovakia, Montenegro, Serbia and North Macedonia had lower life expectancy.
Albania had an identical life expectancy to the US WHITE population.
Now, I know this is mostly because Americans are very, very fat and because of opium and all that, but c'mon. Don't piss on me and tell me that it's raining.
India is low on homicide for a brown country probably because of all the fennel making them into pussies.
Is it? Syria is at 2.07 (obviously 2010). Egypt is 1.3. Morocco is 1.7.
The 'brown countries' with high homicide rates are all on the wrong side of the Atlantic.
I mean, go right ahead and subtract FIFTY SIX percent from your homicide rate, ... But I despise this special pleading from Americans.
Blacks are a special case though. Try as you might, you just can't conceive of how so.
I see you are particularly triggered by the life expectancy claim.
It's way more complicated than just "our number big", it's calculated differently by each country and there's wars, natural disasters, disease, drugs, rural vs urban and all kinds of things that affect a country's life expectancy differently from others; you can hardly live in EU and have it take an hour to get to hospital for your heart attack.
If you have two people choosing the same lifestyle, one in EU and one in US, the one in US will live longer.
Blacks are a special case though. Try as you might, you just can't conceive of how so.
Muslims are about 10% of the population of France and commit a majority of the crimes. They do a better job than blacks in the US.
I see you are particularly triggered by the life expectancy claim.
Not at all. Japan and I believe China have a greater life expectancy than Europe. It's just that it's not true.
It's way more complicated than just "our number big", it's calculated differently by each country and there's wars, natural disasters, disease, drugs, rural vs urban and all kinds of things that affect a country's life expectancy differently from others; you can hardly live in EU and have it take an hour to get to hospital for your heart attack.
Absolutely right, at least relative to the US. I offered two explanations of my own as well. But the fact that we are does mean that our life expectancy is lower than that of white Americans, as you claimed. You seem to be conceding that and moving on to the 'offering reasons' stage.
If you have two people choosing the same lifestyle, one in EU and one in US, the one in US will live longer.
Based on? Greater wealth? I'm not sure that is true, but I'll concede that anyway.
Last year’s Hathras gang-rape case in India saw perpetrators with political influence enjoy absolute impunity as they utilized the very institutions established to ensure justice for victims instead be used against them. The victim was a Dalit—from the “lowest” rungs of the Hindu caste hierarchy—while the culprits were from the “highest” caste, or the Brahmin community. The elected officials of Uttar Pradesh sided with the perpetrators likely because they electorally rely on the vote-bank of upper-caste Hindus,
That is surprising. There are that many upper-caste people?
BTW, Atlantic Council is basically a NATO thinktank, so there are some real howlers there. Here's one of their "solutions".
I wasn't disputing what you said. It's difficult to judge from so far apart, and knowing no Indians at all (for all I know, it might be a media-driven feminist psyop), but if you put a gun to my head, I would say that India probably has more of a rape problem than other Asian countries.
Though living in Europe, I really have no business being critical of other countries regarding rape, considering that we import masses of people to Rape All You Can, and then they're protected by governments to a probably greater extent than rapists in India are.
In America most of the latino criminals are recorded as white. Crime is actually 60% black and 30% south american (historically there's also Irish and Italian crime, but those don't measure up anymore).
The purpose of breaking down the statistics is to counter the propaganda that "whites commit more crimes." We're only separating by race because they do it first.
It's also trivial to see that white America was safer. We used to hang people for stealing a horse. Now hundreds of cars are stolen daily with no punishments. The shootout at the OK corral was the highest murder count in the history of Arizona at the time: 3. It caused a sensational trial that the entire country took notice of. Now it's just an average Saturday in every major city.
In America most of the latino criminals are recorded as white. Crime is actually 60% black and 30% south american (historically there's also Irish and Italian crime, but those don't measure up anymore).
Is there documentation for how much crime is committed by whites?
The purpose of breaking down the statistics is to counter the propaganda that "whites commit more crimes." We're only separating by race because they do it first.
Everyone knows that is absurd. I don't begrudge people bringing up race at all, it's just the "as safe as Europe" (which, to be honest, isn't terribly safe either) that I take issue with.
India is the largest 'non-white' country when it comes to population. It isn't quite as clear-cut as you say. Sure, it's true of the Americas and of South Africa, but elsewhere, it's mixed at best. Including the Middle East, which surprises me.
Egypt: 1.3
Iran: 2.4
Jordan: 1.0
Israel: 1.6
Also, how do you explain this, btw?
What precisely is there to explain? There are some sick people around. Do you think I meant to say that India is a great place? Hell no, I wouldn't want to be found dead there. But it isn't quite as bad when it comes to homicide.
The crime stats U.S. race realists use are FBI (government) stats, which cover the entirety of the U.S.
[edit] I was saying that some factual data can come from the government, even though it is skewed in other ways, like including central and south American non-whites in the White crime category.
Narinder is the typical minority female leftist. She manipulates language in order to benefit her, uses her oppression status in order to get gibs, and generally just grifts her way through life. Usually she goes up against midwits, but Carl isn't a midwit and of course absolutely bodied her the whole time.
The real takeaway from this is how she flipflops between claiming she is just as British as them while also wanting gibs for being a pajeet, sometimes even in the same sentence. These people do not actually see themselves as being British. They see Britain as a lithium mine to be plundered and then left to ruin the environment for the natives. They have an in-group preference, and if the native British want to survive, they need to start developing one ASAP, or they will be murdered and enslaved.
IIRC this was from a few years ago and Carl actually had a separate video as a disclaimer pointing out that yes it's funny but that he didn't humiliate her purposefully and was polite because these videos are important. Largely the left just doesn't do them since 2015/16 era and it's important to give them a platform to say this dumb shit, his point was that you don't actually have to savage them, you just ask a few basic questions to reflect on their beliefs and let them talk.
He was actually quite polite during the invitation and she actually thanked him at the end.
What you are watching in that clip is an Anointed desperately clinging to their malignant moral superiority, and Carl is directly challenging the supposed basis for her position, and showing it for the delusion that it is.
Yes, she is a dunderhead, but in her world that doesn't matter, her moral vanity is all that matters.
I listened to her interview, she goes from I'm just as British as you to you owe us reparations because I'm Indian in the span of a few mins.
Jeet grifting
Scamming is in their blood it seems. Just don't mention the word "redeem" or they will yell at you :)
They are very racist and dirty. If you watch some street food videos, its disgusting as hell, hygenic wise. And we all see them hiring only their own when they get a position in a company and treat others like shit.
Even when it makes no sense they'll use their hands to mix food and drink
Yeah. They bring their bad habits and practices over. And when you try to tell them its no good, they cry racism.
Is it stupidity or malice? I always choose the latter anymore. There’s no amount of stupidity in modern society that can’t or hasn’t seen the damage caused by mass immigration and “cultural assimilation”. The only explanation is she doesn’t care, she wants the continuation of the insanity because of the longhouse effect. This is another example of the feminist Iroquois longhouse I keep mentioning. She was told by her matriarchal structure that discrimination and discernment is bad, she then formulates an impenetrable mindset based around that belief. There’s no foundation of this belief, no scientific basis, no religious basis, no historical basis, but because it is pushed by the matriarchal structure it must be enforced.
Why not both?
it's malice induced by stupidity. 🌎🧑🚀🔫🧑🏿🚀🌕 always has been.
Malice is willingly and knowingly, stupidity is ignorance. One is knowing what you are doing, the other is not.
It's a good mix of both. Stupidity allows her to act on her malice while maintaining a clear conscious.
At some point the distinction stops mattering, the correct response is to remove them either way.
The solution to Hanlon’s Razor:
“Where malice is treated as incompetence, both shall flourish. Where incompetence is treated as malice, both shall whither.”
When they don't know what they're talking about or get tripped up in an argument, they just talk louder and never stop talking. Or they just say "That's BS I don't believe that. Discussion over."
assimilation isn't the problem, lack of assimilation is...the governments of the west have spent the better part of sixty years impeding assimilation.
...and the problem is she's working backward from the conclusion, rather than working forward towards a conclusion
Assimilation is a myth. Always has been, always will be.
Ethnic groups adapt, and they adapt to the absolute minimum the larger society allows. It's why you still have identifiable ethnic groups scattered across America over a century after they came over.
Assimilation was always a nonsensical concept. You can not assimilate a Muslim to Christian values. It takes centuries to even get to a point where you can make minor assimilation between similar countries.
'Racism' is the 21st centurese for 'heresy'.
Libs are too stupid or is it just browns?
libs. it's a product of all the soy that consume.
True, white libs are geniuses.
Yep, the common argument I see here about 12/60 is that it's all Whitey's fault for being racist to them. It's extremely rare to see some one denying the disparity exists at all. I think I've only seen it from Twitter randos and such.
Asian being underrepresented, because all the raping pakis get off with a slap on the wrist.
The British ofbuscate statistics as much as possible.
The later graphs by muslim population is closer to reality. But as you said, the police delibetarely ignore crimes comited by middle-easterners.
I wonder what would happen if he showed her a list of countries by homicide or rape rates...
Homicide rate according to Wikiderpia:
United States: 5.7
India: 2.8
Can we get the White American homicide rate vs the actual Indian rate?
Wait, so people get to exclude groups you don't like? Let's see an Indian Brahman homicide rate vs. the actual American rate.
I'm not sure Americans should be bragging about their homicide rate.
US homicide rate is high exclusively because of the non-White demographic. Without it we are one of the safest countries in the world.
So you're not safe, and you compare yourself after arbitrary, non-real world adjustments to a Europe WITH all the immigrants committing crimes.
Well, without immigrants, Europe is safer than paradise itself. Possibly even as safe as Japan.
Congratulations. After flatly denying what we were saying, you somehow managed to come to the conclusion we were saying.
You have 1 more IQ point than the chick in this video.
He's just being hostile because he's brown.
What exactly is your 'conclusion'? That the US without blacks should be compared with Europe with immigrants?
If we're playing that game, I think we should compare Europe without immigrants to the US with blacks, so we're 100x safer rather than just 2-10 times.
P.S. Even excluding blacks, the US has a higher homicide rate and a lower life expectancy than Europe.
Thank you for proving my point!
Your point is that US whites are way more violent than European whites?
Why, if that was your point, why did I ever argue with it?
Wait, are you just a eurofag?
He's not European, he just just lives there
As opposed to what?
Remove six percent of the population in America and the homicide rate dips down to European average.
So, yeah.
So you have to remove six percent just to reach European crime rates which include all the crimes by immigrants and Muslims?
Remove six percent of our population and our homicide rate is like 3% of yours.
Even without inner city black population, we'd still have a shit ton of immigrants (legal and otherwise) and Muslims.
OK, so it didn't work to say "compare non-blacks in America vs. Europe including immigrants".
Alright, then you compare your white population vs. our white population. Who will win?
Nope.
Homicide rate in the US is a bit lower than Europe if just a few of the black areas of Chicago, Baltimore, and a couple more are excluded - not even all black areas, just a handful.
It's pretty much that way for any metric, like schools or life expectancy or whatever. Exclude the blacks from the stats and America is freakin' amazing.
India is low on homicide for a brown country probably because of all the fennel making them into pussies.
I mean, go right ahead and subtract FIFTY SIX percent from your homicide rate, and see lower than how many European countries it is. I'm guessing zero, but you might land yourself on the west side of Albania and Belarus.
Don't get me wrong, we suck too! But I despise this special pleading from Americans. Don't you think we'd like to exclude the 80% of crimes and murders that are committed by Muslims and immigrants? Why do you get to exclude blacks, who have been there for centuries, why we have to include Muslims who just arrived on a boat and started a-raping?
In 2020, white life expectancy in the US was 77.4 years, according to the CDC.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2022/20220831.htm
Average life expectancy in the EU in 2020 was 80.4 years: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/images/6/67/Table01_Life_expectancy_at_birth_1980-2022_v1.png
Bulgaria, Slovakia, Montenegro, Serbia and North Macedonia had lower life expectancy.
Albania had an identical life expectancy to the US WHITE population.
Now, I know this is mostly because Americans are very, very fat and because of opium and all that, but c'mon. Don't piss on me and tell me that it's raining.
Is it? Syria is at 2.07 (obviously 2010). Egypt is 1.3. Morocco is 1.7.
The 'brown countries' with high homicide rates are all on the wrong side of the Atlantic.
Blacks are a special case though. Try as you might, you just can't conceive of how so.
I see you are particularly triggered by the life expectancy claim.
It's way more complicated than just "our number big", it's calculated differently by each country and there's wars, natural disasters, disease, drugs, rural vs urban and all kinds of things that affect a country's life expectancy differently from others; you can hardly live in EU and have it take an hour to get to hospital for your heart attack.
If you have two people choosing the same lifestyle, one in EU and one in US, the one in US will live longer.
Muslims are about 10% of the population of France and commit a majority of the crimes. They do a better job than blacks in the US.
Not at all. Japan and I believe China have a greater life expectancy than Europe. It's just that it's not true.
Absolutely right, at least relative to the US. I offered two explanations of my own as well. But the fact that we are does mean that our life expectancy is lower than that of white Americans, as you claimed. You seem to be conceding that and moving on to the 'offering reasons' stage.
Based on? Greater wealth? I'm not sure that is true, but I'll concede that anyway.
I’m not sure you should be offering opinions on American culture or politics at all.
I agree, you get your empire off our continent and stop exporting BLM and transgenderism to us, and I'll never say anything about America, ever again.
Literally every ill that plagues the US was imported from the old world.
Obviously. Same for anything good in the US. It is a country, if we can call it that, that is completely derivative of Europe.
Now that you mention castes...
That is surprising. There are that many upper-caste people?
BTW, Atlantic Council is basically a NATO thinktank, so there are some real howlers there. Here's one of their "solutions".
No one ever told me 'rape is bad'.
Fine...
Better?
I wasn't disputing what you said. It's difficult to judge from so far apart, and knowing no Indians at all (for all I know, it might be a media-driven feminist psyop), but if you put a gun to my head, I would say that India probably has more of a rape problem than other Asian countries.
Though living in Europe, I really have no business being critical of other countries regarding rape, considering that we import masses of people to Rape All You Can, and then they're protected by governments to a probably greater extent than rapists in India are.
In America most of the latino criminals are recorded as white. Crime is actually 60% black and 30% south american (historically there's also Irish and Italian crime, but those don't measure up anymore).
The purpose of breaking down the statistics is to counter the propaganda that "whites commit more crimes." We're only separating by race because they do it first.
It's also trivial to see that white America was safer. We used to hang people for stealing a horse. Now hundreds of cars are stolen daily with no punishments. The shootout at the OK corral was the highest murder count in the history of Arizona at the time: 3. It caused a sensational trial that the entire country took notice of. Now it's just an average Saturday in every major city.
Is there documentation for how much crime is committed by whites?
Everyone knows that is absurd. I don't begrudge people bringing up race at all, it's just the "as safe as Europe" (which, to be honest, isn't terribly safe either) that I take issue with.
now show rape rates
I was talking mostly about South Africa, South America, the caribbeans and the middle east.
Why highlight India and ignore the rest? Also, how do you explain this, btw?
India is the largest 'non-white' country when it comes to population. It isn't quite as clear-cut as you say. Sure, it's true of the Americas and of South Africa, but elsewhere, it's mixed at best. Including the Middle East, which surprises me.
Egypt: 1.3
Iran: 2.4
Jordan: 1.0
Israel: 1.6
What precisely is there to explain? There are some sick people around. Do you think I meant to say that India is a great place? Hell no, I wouldn't want to be found dead there. But it isn't quite as bad when it comes to homicide.
You know Asia is safer if we only include east asians countries and not South Asian countries, right?
Also, Israel has different problems
I don't have to explain why almost everytime there's a rape case, it becoming national trend on porn sites isn't just "some sick people around" do I?
Japan and China are safer than India, no one will dispute that.
Both groups of countries are safer than the US.
Did you read the article? It was supposedly a trend on Google Trends. It's not clear how many people were searching for it.
It wasn't a single case tho.
Also this
Yes, yes they are. What would happen if they get flooded by muslim or african immigrants then?
So how many people were there?
What odd phrasing, by the way. How many people were searching for it with the victim's name before the crime, for searches for it to rise by 160-190%?
And there it is. they don't care about the quality of the data, or even the type of data, so long as it comes from their masters.
The crime stats U.S. race realists use are FBI (government) stats, which cover the entirety of the U.S.
[edit] I was saying that some factual data can come from the government, even though it is skewed in other ways, like including central and south American non-whites in the White crime category.
What a dumb ass bitch.
I can't stand her accent, she sounds like a retard, in addition to saying retarded things.
I listened to this at work back in February
Narinder is the typical minority female leftist. She manipulates language in order to benefit her, uses her oppression status in order to get gibs, and generally just grifts her way through life. Usually she goes up against midwits, but Carl isn't a midwit and of course absolutely bodied her the whole time.
The real takeaway from this is how she flipflops between claiming she is just as British as them while also wanting gibs for being a pajeet, sometimes even in the same sentence. These people do not actually see themselves as being British. They see Britain as a lithium mine to be plundered and then left to ruin the environment for the natives. They have an in-group preference, and if the native British want to survive, they need to start developing one ASAP, or they will be murdered and enslaved.
Willfully ignorant use to have a specific word used for that definition. Willfully ignorant.
IIRC this was from a few years ago and Carl actually had a separate video as a disclaimer pointing out that yes it's funny but that he didn't humiliate her purposefully and was polite because these videos are important. Largely the left just doesn't do them since 2015/16 era and it's important to give them a platform to say this dumb shit, his point was that you don't actually have to savage them, you just ask a few basic questions to reflect on their beliefs and let them talk.
He was actually quite polite during the invitation and she actually thanked him at the end.
This was from months ago...
Old, but still amusing.
What you are watching in that clip is an Anointed desperately clinging to their malignant moral superiority, and Carl is directly challenging the supposed basis for her position, and showing it for the delusion that it is.
Yes, she is a dunderhead, but in her world that doesn't matter, her moral vanity is all that matters.