26
SR388-SAX 26 points ago +26 / -0

Could you narrow that down a bit?

I can come up with like 10 groups off the top of my head that you might be referring to.

3
SR388-SAX 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ok, you're just a retard.

You might even actually know what you're talking about -- but you're still a fucking retard.

8
SR388-SAX 8 points ago +9 / -1

Oh, finally found the post with your amazing credentials.

You touched one. Wow! So impressive! That totally absolves your belligerent assholery, O wise master.

9
SR388-SAX 9 points ago +10 / -1

Ok, fine. Journalists are trash.

So what do you base your opinion on? What Lockheed says? What the DOD says? Personal experience flying or maintaining one?

You've typed out a lot of words conveying opinions but so far I haven't seen an ounce of credentials as for why anyone should give a shit about them.

9
SR388-SAX 9 points ago +9 / -0

But that's not great, especially for Hollywood and, like you said, she's often cast where you're expected to believe she's a knockout, which she isn't.

Yeah, if I saw her out somewhere, I'd think nothing of her. Not ugly, not pretty, just maybe a bit over average (if for no other reason, simply because she's not a hambeast).

But we're expected to pretend that she's the most beautiful thing in the world, and that's a level of gaslighting that nobody should put up with.

Nobody would even care about her looks, except they forced us to.

Kind of like nobody would care about Michael Brown or George Floyd, but they forced us to.

They invert reality and then demand that we accept it.

21
SR388-SAX 21 points ago +25 / -4

The thing is, she's not ugly, she's a perfectly acceptable 6 who someone would be very happy with if not for her insufferable personality.

But Hollywood puts her in a position where her beauty is directly called into question and she pretends that she's worthy of it, and no reasonable person wants to share in that delusion. Compared to the stunningly beautiful starlets I saw when growing up like Nicole Kidman or Jennifer Connelly, the idea that she's the "fairest of them all" would be a comedic notion ... but they want to force us to believe that it's true.

3
SR388-SAX 3 points ago +3 / -0

Seems like a pretty easy tradeoff -- don't allow posts for brand new users, but do allow comments. Maybe with a daily limit or something that gets larger based on not getting downvoted into oblivion.

Then do the same thing for posts; after a month of not being an idiot in comments, give someone a chance to not be an idiot in posts as well. And make the flag easily reset-able if someone chooses to be an idiot.

Blanket comment deletions are stupid.

1
SR388-SAX 1 point ago +1 / -0

First, if we believe it's true, can it be in vain?

I'm not an expert here. My assumption would be that the motivation/mens rea behind it would be the distinction. Saying it to affirm it or to inform someone seems like it would be just fine to me. Saying it to knock someone else or put them in their place ... I dunno. I can't speak for God, but I think he might give someone a side-eye for that.

Two, say it for us if you will, but remember, we do believe it

Eh, I believe it as well in a different manner.

Religion, whether true or not, is what builds civilization.

There is no civilization that I would want to live in except the ones built by Christianity. Even if none of the supernatural stuff is 100% true ... by its fruits shall you know it.

1
SR388-SAX 1 point ago +1 / -0

too many compromised agents

They had no trouble finding enough people willing to kick in doors at 6:00 AM and shoot the occupants of the house.

18
SR388-SAX 18 points ago +18 / -0

I'm sure that most Christians wouldn't be so petty as to say "Christ is King" out of spite. Hell, that could probably be seen as blasphemous for taking God's name in vain.

But I'll be happy to say it in their place to any jackass that has a problem with it.

21
SR388-SAX 21 points ago +22 / -1

Every single time a woman is brave enough to drag it all out into daylight

"And the men that also stuck their necks out? Fuck them."

27
SR388-SAX 27 points ago +27 / -0

She probably was naturally pretty and then got all that shit done anyway.

3
SR388-SAX 3 points ago +4 / -1

Massie was never on "your" side. He just doesn't take PAC money, including AIPAC, and doesn't like foreign influence, including AIPAC.

AIPAC being the one of the most prominent sources of foreign influence is just a coincidence in this case, not because Massie doesn't like Israel or Jews.

And I've spent a lot of time defending you here because you're not wrong about everything and the people who don't like you respond with insufferable assholery. Don't pull an Impossible1 and post retarded shit that just drives everyone away from the useful or even borderline stuff.

1
SR388-SAX 1 point ago +1 / -0

if shooting thieves was treated like it is in red rural areas

Red rural areas mostly don't have to deal with thieves. Maybe the odd tweaker, but not what should be functional human beings who instead choose to loot stores.

3
SR388-SAX 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep. It's all women hate all men and want them dead, his mom being the sole exception.

I suspect even the vast majority of Jew-noticers don't think it's all Jews (except their moms).

1
SR388-SAX 1 point ago +2 / -1

Don't you get it? It doesn't matter that the entire federal government apparatus has aligned against him and the American people and will fight tooth and nail to not allow anything to happen that could jeopardize their gravy train. He's obviously Israeli controlled opposition.

Clearly someone else would have been way better because every other alternative was Israeli-controlled and also blue-collar-America-hating.

2
SR388-SAX 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is simple stuff. Duh. The TV told me so.

See, with Democrat policies, there's a lag so that the beneficial things they provide happen during Republican administrations and the bad things that happen during their own administrations are a result of the similar lag from the previous Republican administration's bad policies. But, paradoxically and simultaneously, Republican policies are immediate and absolute, so anything bad that happens during their administrations is entirely their fault.

5
SR388-SAX 5 points ago +5 / -0

Also makes sense for people who are incapable of taking care of necessary maintenance of a property on their own.

3
SR388-SAX 3 points ago +3 / -0

No. Trump shit-talked him over his vote against the budget continuing resolution.

4
SR388-SAX 4 points ago +4 / -0

"The Glory" is a pretty decent series. Revenge story about a girl who was mercilessly, cruelly bullied and tortured in high school, enabled by parents and teachers.

Even the first couple episodes are enough to probably let you know that most Americans would be completely incompatible with Korean culture. I'd have been throwing hands repeatedly based on the way people were being treated.

2
SR388-SAX 2 points ago +2 / -0

Y'know, if you just hit "mute" on all of those engagement farmers, you don't have to see them. It works pretty well.

First thing I did when reactivating my X account was start muting anyone that posted yes/no questions or surveys.

view more: Next ›