PC games started abandoning stand-alone servers long before cross-platform console ports became the norm.

Blocks only prevent posts from showing up. Comments still show.

It's not social media addiction, it's a narcissist's validation addiction. Social media is just an extremely low-effort way to for a narcissist to feed it.

I'll see your "people who hold me to account by merely allowing other to speak should be jailed forever" with "tyrants should be subject to actions that are in violation of rule 2".

I guess the thing keeping ugly women out of Hollywood was the "would Harvey fuck them" filter?

Journalists aren't botting anything. They don't know how to code, and they don't make enough money to pay someone that does.

X

His other comment is also a 100% mind-reading sperg-out.

I really don't follow Candace much so maybe I missed the part where she claimed that she wanted people to be killed and lose their jobs, but I'm pretty sure that never happened.

Right to privacy only applies to killing babies, not owning dangerous shooty things.

(the "dungeons" in TOTK were a joke, among other things)

What? You thought "look in correct direction to figure out where you need to go on the map that's pretty clearly marked, then go there, then flip a switch" was weak? You weren't excited by opening a chest and finding ... some arrows or Zonai parts?

I just played through Majora's Mask again and am nearly done with Minish Cap and they both just make me sad at the state of video games today. Don't get me wrong, both BotW and TotK did some things extremely well and are impressive technical achievements, but they didn't even bother to try to do any of the things that I care about in a Zelda game.

Lauren's really been pretty awful lately. I know she's gone through some shit in her personal life but she really does protest too much on topics like this.

Following someone else's logic to a conclusion is not a "hypothetical." It's just pointing out where your logic leads.

You're the one coming up with justifications for intentionally nuking civilians.

How many lives could be saved if we nuked Jerusalem?

It's really easy to drop the label. Obama's 2nd term did that to me, and then Hillary's run convinced me that anti-Democrat is actually the saner option.

Excellence is excellence.

If there is such a thing as "black excellence," I've never seen an example of it.

A reference to people discussing topics regarding actors that have any link, tenuous or otherwise, to Judaism. In this case Israel's sacred status as "our most important ally" while they use all of our aid money and (stolen) military technology to blow up Palestinians.

Being "merciful" to them could have multiple interpretations.

Some might not be ones they'd choose.

Well you can, and they're trying to. We'll see how successful they are, but if their support doesn't collapse over this (spoiler: it won't), it'll be swept under the rug and forgotten forever.

I don't even care about the thousands of children (I also don't actually believe the official numbers. By the time this is over the death toll will probably be around 6 million, depending on who you ask). The children would grow up to be as terrible as the parents.

As far as I'm concerned, let them fight. Both sides are awful. I don't care if Israel "wins" -- I just want to quit sending them both money.

The problem is that nearly everyone on the Republican depth chart is actually an anti-US globalist.

Ian Smith goes on the Hodge Twins podcast and discusses running for office and how AIPAC interferes in our elections, among other things, including "if a man enters a woman's bathroom they should have their ass beaten on sight."

Hodge Twins put on a pretty good show in general. They get more laughs out of me than pretty much everything else I watch, combined.

You say, as you accuse Tate of a bunch of stuff and can't actually provide any specifics or evidence.

Also, these are women who managed to get into prison. They almost certainly deserve anything that happens to them.

I think the most accurate statement is, "Bush was complicit in 9/11". It was, IMO, almost certainly orchestrated by the alphabet agencies who consider themselves to be above the law.

There've only been 12 players in the history of the WNBA with their own signature shoe. In the past, almost every signature shoe from 1995-2011 belonged to a black (sic) woman. The fact that only white women hold the power of the signature shoe now, as the WNBA enters its most high profile and prosperous phase, shows how black (sic) women are being ignored in a league that they dominate.

They don't say how many "white women hold the power of the signature shoe now" so there's no way to even know what we're comparing. It's so weaselly worded that I don't even understand how how a list of 12 people that was, at least at one point, dominated by black women now somehow has its "power" held by white women. What, are there 2 current white women with signature shoes and 0 black women? Is that what we're complaining about? Or is it 1 white woman that the article acknowledges as the best player in the world, making it even stupider?

Also, somehow the fact that black women dominated the list from 1995-2011 isn't a problem, because they suddenly understand per-capita.

God I hate these people.

I once implemented an insecure security-by-obscurity mechanism in an app I was developing, at my employer's demand, that I completely disagreed with on a technical level.

Totally the same thing as facilitating industrial-scale child rape.