No no...

What we are seeing is the consequence of the removal of the weight of necessity and circumstance. The expression of the id was being held under pressure, it's now showing its equilibrium point.

If you want to restore the system to the state it was in, you have to put it back in the state it was in.

Where does this shit come from?

Smoking.

I don't think you understand. Before 1980... everyone, and I do mean everyone, smoked like a goddamn incinerator. And when you do that, you go straight from looking 20 to 45 in the span of about 5 years.

Girls have been saying Elliot Roger was good looking.

Yeah, because they want a greek hoplight to kick their trojan door in. Here is the great question: Is men's enemy women's primal id, or man's civilization building ego?

MGTOWs decided it was the id, and refuse to play women's game. They have (will have) removed themselves from the future.

Incels decided it was the ego, and are waiting for a critical mass and leader to emerge so they can resume history and play the game by biology's (ie, women's) rules.

DomitiusOfMassilia (moderator comment): Reminder: keep the conversation on Castlevania — games or adaptations — and avoid derailing into modern politics unless it ties directly to media criticism. Also, no attacking users who disagree. This is still a forum, not Twitter.

(Melody: Dynamite, Taio Cruz)

Cuz he's a bot bot bot bot

He says the same thing quite a lot lot lot lot

Has the braincells of a thot thot thot thot

Need more mods and he's like wot? wot? wot? wot?

There must be something we can do

To change the ownership of TWO...

This right here, this is some Mage technocracy shit. Consensus deciding that people who don't subscribe to consensus are crazy.

Haven't watched it, but yeah in the old EU the massacre was understood to be Tarkin's star destroyer leveling a city and then landing on the ashes for good measure.

I'm watching Seaquest, which ran from 1993-1996.

There was only one season of seaQuest. If you say otherwise...

What do you do with video games.

Drive EA to the graves of Maxis and Westwood, throw a shovel on the ground and say "start digging" while holding a gun.

Do any of you pay $200 to go buy books?

Well, I mean, Comiket....

But this sure as hell ain't Comiket.

"Only an idiot fights a war on two fronts. Only the heir to the kingdom of idiots fights a war on TWELVE fronts." -Babylon 5

One thing at a time.

adaptive difficulty

As in rubber banding? Or just flat out "ignores fog of war and still sucks".

Iran is messy.

Kirkpatrick was right that WE pushed the Shah to liberalize, which fueled Khomeini's opposition.

Then, after the revolution and having been told to fuck off, the neocon camp of GHW Bush and the like decided to prop up Hussein as an angry puppet to punish Iran with.

I don't expect there will be a war with Iran. Maybe another sea conflict like what happened with Operation Praying Mantis.

You need to read more. Go get Herbert Hoover's book, "Freedom Betrayed".

Cordell Hull railroaded Konoe's government into collapse, knowing full well he'd get a militarist who would give FDR a pretense to break his campaign pledge and join the shooting war in earnest.

IT'S HAPPENING

Another flaming zeppelin on the pile.

MGM reports 34 employees cut and that the concierge desks will close at 6 of their facilities, with concierge calls for those venues routed to concierge desks at the Aria and Bellagio. This is in response to an overall decline in concierge usage due improvements to and greater utilization of their mobile app and online services.

men are gods, so afford then all such privileges

Uh, no, that's the exact opposite of what I'm saying.

you're Canadian

And you're shit terrible at doxing, because I'm not.

You're a definite atheist, that's why you can believe in anonymity. A believer knows that anonymity is temporary cover at best.

Would that I could make humanity incapable of anonymity, or even deceit. That would be heaven and hell on earth, and it would be far more hellish to those I'm opposed to than it would be to me.

If you think you need anonymity to be free then the question should be asked what you're trying to do with freedom.

In my experience, 99% of the time that freedom is being used to preach for someone else's death.

"This goes against everything you stand for, but you're reading too much into it, bud."

Anonymity is a means, not a end.

If god descended from on high and offered to strike down the SJWs and cultural marxists and regular marxists, to leave their ideology and all their works in ruins never to rise again, and the price was the loss of anonymity...

I'd make that deal.

crusade against online anonymity

While I comprehend WHY anyone on this site, forced to the margin of discourse as we are, would be aggrieved by that position at first pass, I think you're reading a bit much into it. He's angry at the twitterati, much as we are.

stupid tradcuck takes

Okay, but that's hardly new. His viewpoint was always rooted in the old world of the 20th century consensus.

In what way could you possibly describe JP as "selling out"?

49.85 hz

(Shrug)

During the 2003 Blackout, frequency on the NY west and NY east grid got between 63 and 57 hz before it started triggering Zone 3 impedance relays.

Locke couldn't reconcile atheism and didn't try to, in the end his only answer was that it must be made illegal.

And that undermines everything else he said.

Somebody clearly doesn't remember proxy mines from GoldenEye 64 and Perfect Dark.