It's not clearly visible in many frames because the frames are interlaced. The same clip has the front left 1/4th of car disappear into the pavement - you think he's got a magic car that he can make part of it disappear at will? lol
So you're just going to ignore the several clearer views that absolutely disprove it. What a clown.
And then say what about the other evidence somebody proven to be manipulating you had? Is that reference pic even his car? Known liar says so - good enough for you. Wow. Pathetic.
'''They''' identified Nick Fuentes as somebody to blackball first year in college when he had like 10 viewers.
First thing guest says is Kirk was surrounded by bad dudes before 2020 even. I wouldn't say for sure Erika is the control, but I wouldn't be surprised.
Trump interview said he talked with him last night at like 7 pm, Lindsey was back by then.
I think if they were trying to cover something up they wouldn't have Trump be talking about it.
He could have been poisoned in Ukraine, but it's probably deep vein thrombosis or something like that. Long plane rides can be deadly for old people.
No I'm saying you'll look at some low res image somebody screen-capped from a youtube stream of an oblique view of a court monitor showing interlaced video from a convex camera and say "aha it's not him look at the pixels!".
Just like the gloves, any little imaginary discrepancy to hang your hat on. Anything that validates your crazy.
You can see at 3:36 there's nothing weird on the front of this car. It doesn't look at all like the OP screenshot. Turning into the row at 3:53 there's nothing on the front.
Leaving at 6:03 you can see the 'lower lip' in some frames so it's not totally faked, but somebody carefully picked out a frame with probably compression or interlacing artifacts and made you look like a fool.
I guess I don't live around retards.
edit: this is Tyler's car btw, showing the same look as the picture in evidence.
Apparently the exhaust pipes are recessed in that box so you wouldn't be able to see how many from that side view.
Twitter guy posted a follow-up that's so blurry it could easily mask 4 pipes, and looks like 4 to me.
The front lip is weird looking, but if you think about how retarded it would look driving around like that it's probably just a trick of the lens and light, just like that guy on the news that looked like he was wearing a mask - was just bright directional lights on his wattle.
Yeah no shit, that's the point. The jury just used the glove as an excuse to rationalize letting him off, even though it clearly did fit, just like you guys are doing here.
"If the pixels are blurry, must hung jury".
What's more comical is even if this were true and not just a low res camera still you're helping to convict your boy because then the prosecution won't present that evidence to the jury. /golfclap
In your mind them saying they wished Kirk dead is evidence they planned it together, which is proof the prosecutors were in on it because they didn't prosecute, which proves that Tyler didn't do the shooting.
Simple delusion more like.
When prosecutors can't get charges through a grand jury they can still offer immunity from future prosecution to get cooperation. The person goes along with it to not have a Sword of Damocles because if the state keeps investigating they might find enough.
This happens all the time, it's common.
Your one-line discord message isn't nearly enough to get an indictment so there wouldn't be a plea deal.
Again, duh.
Prosecutors do this all the time. Give a deal to somebody less convictable to get their cooperation.
I know you follow this case fanatically so you must have seen that Twig-boyfriend guy showing up in a suit instead of as a furry.
Duh. You're seriously confused by this?
but it’s an extremely important part of this investigation because it would disprove that the shot came from anywhere else other than that rooftop
It wouldn't prove that at all. Maybe the guy just coincidentally sneezed and that's why the pixels shifted a little bit. If he was the supposed fall guy maybe they told him when to twitch to make it look like he shot.
Having unreasonable standards goes both ways, you're using it to pretend there's some other explanation than the obvious and I can use it to dismiss any counter point you make.
Instead you should just go by your normal standards, which I think you've basically said the other evidence is sufficient to convict him on.
And exactly how easy is it to fake text messages? These are pictures of the boyfriend's phone while he's holding it and he's a corroborating witness. The easy explanation is that Tyler is a retard - and we already know he's a retard so that's a pretty compelling explanation.
But instead you believe what? Nation-state remote hacking of Tyler's phone before he was caught to covertly send those messages, or did they hack Discord? Boyfriend himself wrote both sides and then faked all the discord logs? What exactly do you think is anywhere even in competition with Tyler just being a retard?
There isn’t video of him with a gun in his pants. There’s video of a guy with a slight limp.
Or there is a video of him with a gun in his pants. The video doesn't prove or disprove whether he had a gun in his pants; we can't see a barrel and we can't see why he's limping.
But you didn't answer the question, unless you're saying you need to have seen the barrel. Is that your standard in any other murder, 1080p video of the moment itself?
A guy that's at the location, acting suspicious, with motive, said he did it, his boyfriend said he did it. That's already more proof than most convictions.
Also there were clearly some bad people at TP that wanted Kirk gone, embezzlers and grifters.
There doesn't need to be any connection or conspiracy though. The bad guys at TP just had to not fly the drones, not watch the roofs, and their problem goes away sooner or later.
With how much hate the lefties had for Kirk it wouldn't take long.
If that's not enough evidence, how much more evidence would you need to see?
In the clip you believe is deleted on purpose he would be a few pixels high, and if they present it at trial you could just say "it's only a few pixels high, that doesn't prove it's Tyler!" so I don't see how it can be that important to you.
On the other hand Google has been trying to end MV2 for like 5 years now and it's only been the pushback from Brave and other Chromium browsers and threat of forking that's held them back. They're terrified of forks because their browser is in maintenance mode.
It's not even the code that's the problem here, it's the 'app store'. Brave would have to create an extension 'store', merge it with the official one somehow or have two stores one for MV2 and one for Chromium. So this is an outlier in terms of amount of work involved.
Imagine how much more Google-infested Chrome would be if people couldn't just click a button and have the same browser only better.
Starts off talking about how neutral he is, proceeds to talk about "fed sloppers", Tyler's a "patsy", and so on.
What a clown.
The whole video is motivated reasoning. Every new piece of information confirms his biases - how interesting.
For example, he says the limp changed legs how could that be, as if the gun was extending down to the shoe. What retard would put the whole thing down his pants instead of strapping it to his back? In which case the barrel would extend below the belt and require some effort to hide, but not a particular leg limp.
Obviously this Caroll is a smart guy so for him to not consider something so obvious is because he doesn't want to.
I could go on, for example the other bullet. Keystone cop assigned to college daycare duty makes a mistake the one crisis more serious than underage drinking? Nope, probably the 'real killer' left it so we'd know Tyler was a patsy, but he'd still get convicted, but we'd know. Okay a possibility. Very unlikely one.