1
fauxgnaws 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oooooh okay, I finally get it!

You're saying it would be hard for you to do it. Like, how do you even do eminent domain, is that like a form you fill out from the county supervisor's office? It's so confusing!

So yeah, you're totally right, it would be extremely hard for you to do these things.

1
fauxgnaws 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is retarded liberal 'logic', starting with your conclusion and then grasping at straws to 'prove' it. Effect therefore cause.

In their case they say 90% of arrests are black therefore discrimination. In your case you say no bombs so it must be hard to do. It might be discrimination, it might be hard, but that's not how this works.

But liberals are actually smarter because in their case they know the stat, but you don't even know whether Iran has a bomb or how much material they have; they might have ten bombs or enough enriched for fifty - all we know is they haven't detonated a bomb because that's nearly impossible to hide from seismic sensors and would become public. So you're basing your (false) belief about it being hard on another belief not evidence.

Think about how retarded that logic is, you could just as well say high speed rail is extremely hard because CA is spending hundreds of billions and only have like a mile done - hard for CA, not hard for China. It's not the thing itself that's difficult.

7
fauxgnaws 7 points ago +7 / -0

Luther S02 had a subplot that was pretty much exactly what's in the Muslim rape gang report.

Except of course they race swapped the Pakis into white British.

3
fauxgnaws 3 points ago +3 / -0

There was an air show in town I bet they tried to do some trick and the plane came apart.

4
fauxgnaws 4 points ago +4 / -0

Did you disagree with anything?

If you're going to say truth is Israeli propaganda then you can only believe lies.

You're tilting at windmills. I wouldn't lift a finger to help Israel but you're so deranged you can't see that.

4
fauxgnaws 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, that's what I meant.

3
fauxgnaws 3 points ago +3 / -0

True that's why I put 'friend' in scare quotes. A democratic Iran wouldn't be our actual friend either, they'd still be holding a grudge, but better friends than Israel.

That's the whole reason why the deep state overthrew Iran in the first place way back when, so Israel would be the "only democracy" and we'd have to support them.

2
fauxgnaws 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe this is out there, but I think Trump's 4D idea might even be to replace Israel with Iran, or at least have two 'friends' that we can play against each other.

Trump is an old man and he was alive when Iran was a real democracy, a normal country, and knows we replaced that with theocratic hardliners. They still have actual elections, even though they're under the theocracy, that have real impacts on domestic policy and people's lives.

There's no other country in the region that could replace Israel as a western-style democracy, none of the others have the traditions in place for it. And it does explain why Trump would help them rebuild, didn't destroy their infrastructure, and so on.

2
fauxgnaws 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Manhattan Project had slide-rules for calculators and were inventing something new. Their "computers" were people.

The Iranians had modern centrifuges and control systems and designs known to work.

It's not at all comparable, it's laughable.

Lots of other countries haven't done it because they don't want to get bombed by America and don't feel under direct threat, not because it's hard to do. Duh.

6
fauxgnaws 6 points ago +6 / -0

He's made a movie that was bad but probably fun to make, making another one I think, interviewing his heroes. Probably not just miserable.

I think he's basically a liberal that's not retarded. Conservatives are like look at those 'tards, liberals are like you're making me look like a 'tard and get even more mad at it.

OP is right though he's got to update his video soundboards it's just lazy to use the same ones every video.

2
fauxgnaws 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tucker isn't particularly smart but is willing to say he was wrong about things.

That puts him ahead of like 99% of other personalities.

3
fauxgnaws 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's only hard when you have nation-states sabotaging your equipment, as I alluded to.

As you said, some rice farmers in NK did it.

Where do you get this weird idea that it's difficult? Hollywood?

2
fauxgnaws 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could be, but not. A college kid did it in the 70s.

Before your time I guess.

The only hard part is doing it without the Five Eyes and Mossad seeing you.

3
fauxgnaws 3 points ago +3 / -0

You refuse to admit misleading headline is misleading. "Stop now before you embarrass yourself."

If you want to argue some point about the Obama nuclear deal re Trump go ahead, but it's irrelevant.

6
fauxgnaws 6 points ago +6 / -0

No, they did it because they're partisan hacks not because it's legitimate.

I've never heard Trump say they couldn't have a nuclear energy program, only nuclear weapons.

21
fauxgnaws 21 points ago +21 / -0

Nuclear energy program.

What dishonest reporting to not include that word.

Sure it'll be easier to make nukes with more civilian nuclear engineers, but it's not that hard anyway.

1
fauxgnaws 1 point ago +1 / -0

One side had 300 billion in damage, had their leadership decapitated, lost all their large navy ships, and thousands of dead.

The other side got in one successful attack that killed a few people.

Only a Eurofag would have any problem figuring out who won.

3
fauxgnaws 3 points ago +3 / -0

Back in the day there were only a few channels so news had to cater to the average, centrist person.

Still lied, Watergate for instance, but ironically people back then were actually better informed than almost anyone today. Only people today that actively try to find the whole truth are better informed.

So boomers kind of got the rug pulled out from under them.

1
fauxgnaws 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, dude, it's nuts that you would claim that NO ONE got killed when it's actually 13 (not 5 either). 13 is a different number than 0,

Oh god you're actually doing it.

In a war the difference between 6 total dead from the enemy and 0 is zero.

What a clown.

1
fauxgnaws 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're just stringing words together now.

Counting some mechanical failures and accidents is like saying people died of covid instead of with covid - it wasn't Iran that did it. You're up in arms whether it was 0 or 5 that died? That's nuts.

We rescued a guy inside their territory and took no losses except from mechanical failure.

You guys have completely lost the plot here.

2
fauxgnaws 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol doubling down on the copium.

"Iranians are too stoopid to use Chinese radar"

1
fauxgnaws 1 point ago +1 / -0

What defenses? And what have they exactly destroyed, other than such anti-air as Iran had?

As I mentioned, they had advanced defenses from Russia and China. Iran was a modern army.

We decapitated their entire leadership, could fly over their country any time we wanted, and took I think zero casualties doing it. This is the reality.

You guys shouldn't live in a make-believe world. How does it help you to pretend.

view more: Next ›