Always keep the above in mind when people say 'Conspiracies can't really happen, someone would talk'.

The only reason we know about MK Ultra and what they confess to happening(we'll likely never know the full extent) is because of a fucking accident.

I almost got into an argument the other day over the renaming, as they were claiming that the reason it was named 'Gulf of Mexico' was due to the coastline comparison and how the empire of Mexico was there first.

While I'm a little bit skeptical over the coastline argument, I almost wanted to start bringing up how the lady in question was defending a slave-based economy going back to the 1600s(or how it's a murderous narco-state in it's current incarnation), but in the end I just rolled my eyes and reminded myself I wasn't going to get into a historical/political argument over breakfast.

The entire conversation running up to it was just a depressing reminder of how much these people hate/dislike the country they live in. I can't fathom it.

Someone once claimed that women have a severe empathy lack for things they can't see - so when a man goes to work to fund their married lifestyle, it isn't real to them. So when a man comes home, exhausted from work, the woman is incapable of understanding what he's been through and is instead comparing everything she's done that day to his 'nothing'.

I really want to argue against the man's claims, but damn, is it hard.

There's also the expense and time involved, as well, which I imagine is a factor.

But, at the end of the day, black people just don't do outdoor stuff. There was a big push in camping/outdoor circles a while back about 'muh racism' or some stupid bullshit because the insufferable activist crowd noticed that blacks are basically non-existent when it comes to that sort of thing.

Revealed preferences and all.

"Your honor, there is no way he could have killed that piece of shit sc- I mean, fine, upstanding citizen. Why, Nicholas was with me the entire time. Playing poker."

It's what happens when you base your games around appealing to Normies.

I'm still pissed that I can't get in other 4X games what I get in Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri. ...though given how many hours I sunk into that game, probably for the best.

Strangely enough Muslims and Christians were able to mostly peacefully coexist

wut.

No dude. Just, no. Muslims have been killing, raping, and enslaving for thousands of years. The so called 'Islamic Golden Age' Reddit Atheists/Co-Exists/Diversity Niggers love to jerk themselves off about co-incided with rampant Muslim Piracy and Slavery up until the point that Europe got together as a whole and decided to take the fight to them.

I'm not trying to defend Israel here, but the idea that Muslim and Christians have peacefully co-existed outside of being well-armed, xenophobic neighbors is borderline insane.

Thier claims of 'self defense' is based on pure tribal ethnicity - when you talk with these people and dig down into thier reasoning, it basically boils down to 'Well, a White person did THIS(where this is just a superficial understanding of the situation with no bearing on reality), so a black person can do THIS(get revenge for a White person being mean to a black).

They're just saying magic words so they can abuse people not of thier tribe.

What does that even mean?

There was an active political movement post-WW1(Not, two, one) that called for Jews to actively emigrate and settle in Israel.

And it was called, well, Zionism.

They were enough of a political force in Israel pre-WW2 that they actively tried to boycott Germany and had political protests against Nazi Germany, again, all pre-WW2.

Israel wasn't just given over the Jews post-WW2 because people were being nice, after all. They'd pretty much taken the place over before then.

They're desperate to prevent Whites from forming any type of ethnic identity, because they know what'll likely happen when it occurs(because they use their own ethnic identity to leverage power all the time.)

I'm reminded of when Brandon Herrera tried to get elected.

I think it was AIPAC that bragged about supporting his opponent and helping to get him elected.

Cue flood of people wondering why the absolute fuck a state-level minor political guy would be getting major support from a jewish lobby group.

Look, I'll be the first person to advocate that men should, by default, be physically competent and fit armed killers with a coterie of like-minded individual, but that advice really isn't going to fix the core of the issue when it comes to dealing with women - that society as a whole pays deference and privilege to them, and being said physically competent and armed killer is fairly worthless when the State comes knocking at your door or you have no arena to demonstrate said aptitude or and lacking in the necessary physical assets needed to start and protect a family.

And if I went any further into that tangent, I'd probably violate a few rules, so CONTINUINIG ON -

Now, if what you're saying is that things are about to get a little crazy and technical and kinetic and men should be prepared for that - that's fine. I get that. I'm a little bit skeptical of this claim, but it's a fair one to make. However, it's going to be a hard sell for most men just based off of recent history. Men react to incentives - we will chase the moon and spit the devil in the eye if the potential reward is good enough - and the current level of incentives on the ground is very, very lacking.

Honestly, I'm not certain which would be worse. That things do continue on it's current trajectory without altercation, or things happen just as you're describing and the majority of men will be caught flat-footed without proper resource. Hmm.

I guess we really should just Pascal's Wager all up in this bitch and be done with it.

I honestly think this is a fed-driven psyop, just not in the way you'd think.

Maybe it's just me, but has anyone else seen a common thread on twitter and forums and 4chan? The idea that nuclear war isn't really that bad, that it's manageable, survivable even. Something that can be controlled. We don't need to worry about going to war with people whom have nukes, we can counter them easily. Or said nukes are so old that they may not even work, how about that?

Perhaps I'm just schizo-posting, but I think there's a massive effort in some fed think-tanks to drive the idea that war against nuclear powers is either permissible and/or good. That they're so driven for another goddamn war that they've starting to press against the idea of nukes being a civilization/planet ender that the left have been rubbing themselves raw over for the past several decades.

This is just another step in that direction.

Or I could be utterly delusional. Who knows?

Illegal immigration is a massive wealth-transfer from Americans to immigrants and big business.

I honestly hope we won't get to that.

Part of it is that I really want to survive, thanks, and I'd rather not deal with the hassle of living in a metaphorical warzone. Another part of it is the simple desire to not have to deal with the wonders that comes with race-riots, lynching, and blatant racism of the kind that liberals think exists but really don't.

But another part? Another part is that I really, really don't want to have to deal with leftists getting face-fucked by reality when they run head-first into what being a white-minority in a brown country is really like and having to listen to their caterwauling about how they didn't think it would be like this.

We warned you, we pointed out all the warning signs and actions of what these people would do when they were given a sliver of power and privilege, and now you want to climb into my lifeboat? No. GTFO.

I suppose we'll see.

Got it wrong, yup.

...I will point out, however, that this piece of shit is actively going out of his way to look as black as possible for brownie-points. Shave off those pathetic dreadlocks and he'd look like a nebbish, fat, non-discrepant mutt. Absolutely disgusting.

Interesting to consider.

I tend to be against abortion for a number of reasons, but I think hoe_math's reasoning likely boils down to 'Women are too stupid to imagine the unintended consequences of this action, hence, they shouldn't be allowed to'.

...which, while not the entire reasoning as to why I'm against abortion, and I'd put it much differently, I can't say I disagree.

Yoink. Thanks for this.

And yeah, I knew that birth control would fuck around with a woman's hormonal cycle to the point that they'd go for the, well, with lack of a better term 'Beta Male' - this is why, iirc, people were commenting on how attraction would radically change for women when they went off of it(IE, trying to get pregnant in marriage). But I would think there's a vast gap between 'Birth control makes women go for weaker/feminine men' and 'Birth Control makes women gay'.

I guess not.

Stereotypes exist for a reason.

IMHO: Because men, deep down, understand that woman are just overgrown children, have no capability to be responsible for their actions, and need strict control and protection from predatory elements(men AND other women) in their lives.

Sadly, this argument can only be made up to a point. We've made 18 a sort of gross, lossy goal because that's around the point where we can start shipping men off to kill and die for their country, and because we're so equal nowadays, we have to give that to women, as well.

The anger might very well come from how we're supposed to treat the matter(she's 18, that means she's an adult) and how the reality actually is(becoming an adult requires trials and responsibilities), and people really hate having to live with blatant lives.

Counterpoint - they're not so much being attention-whores as being women, and the problem with women is that any man below a 7(on a good day) is Not People and thus invisible.

So when they talk about 'wanting to become a man', they're not talking about being the average Joe Slow. They're talking about the 8s through 10s, whom they think is the standard male experience.

Only, when they finally go through with said chemical and physical mutilation, reality starts getting it's licks in, and all of a sudden they get an up-close and personal experience of just what the normal man goes through, and they fucking hate it. Hence the de-transition. For those that can manage it. Others, well...

But then he might shoot someone.

Or that tends to be the argument they use. Debate with them enough and they'll eventually admit, almost every damn time, that if they had a gun they'd end up wanting to shoot someone.

They're violent, murderous bastards and think everyone else is just like them.

Maybe I'm just a retarded guy, but recalling that one hour-long video that talked about what birth control actually does to a woman's body, if you tried to shove similar into mine, my response would likely involve firearms.

I can't fathom why women think this is a good thing. A dark part of my brain has slowly grown over time with the approach of 'Women should be treated as children with all the authority and responsibility thereof', and I really wish reality would stop adding arguments in favor of that approach.

Fun aside, I recall one study that seemed to imply that birth control can actually make women gay. Wish I had that on-hand, but my organizational skills for such things are abysmal...

Long-term bad diet decisions can be a slippery slope that fucks up the body so badly it can't be fixed outside of drugs. IMO.

This, I actually did not know. Saved.

California seems to be a marvelous example of why 'Ruling from the Bench' is such a horrendous idea.