One of the most delusional tweets I've ever seen
(nitter.net)
Comments (37)
sorted by:
He wasn't wrong until the last sentence when he deliberately dismissed our rage as ignorance.
It's afraid.
I got a kick out of "maybe its the high verbal IQ"
Very reminiscent of Hillary's 2016 loss cope. "She was just too smart for the voters."
I have a rant ive been knocking around in my head for a while about that and it isn't fully formed yet and nobody wants to hear it anyway but tl;dr high verbal IQ may really be a sign of low-mid intelligence, because language didn't evolve for expressing truth and logic, it evolved for socializing and persuasion aka deception. People good at that ability never need to develop actually intelligence to succeed. The same way sexy blondes tend to be bimbos because they didn't need to be smart growing up. By the way what we call AIs now are examples of peak verbal IQ - great at talking and nothing inside.
I mean, people came up with the term 'wordcel' for a reason.
Once you start paying attention, it kind of catches the eye.
It’s just a logical extension of “words as magic spells”. We’ve all come to realize that certain demographics view language as purely transactional - words as nothing more than a series of passwords that generate desirable outcomes for the speaker (as opposed to a cooperative exercise in mutual pursuit of an objective truth).
This dynamic gives rise to cargo cult behaviors among low IQ demos; black “intellectuals” in particular are very likely to espouse argumentative structures which they do not even remotely understand. These idiots heard someone else say “whataboutism”, so they filed that word under “winning arguments” and proceeded to deploy it with great confidence in totally incorrect contexts.
The other side of that demonic bell curve are the high IQ people who are legitimately good at lying, pilpul, and every other form of verbal manipulation. This is what we are actually talking about when we say “verbal IQ”. It’s not the ability to communicate clearly or succinctly. It’s about spinning twenty dollar words - many of them manufactured without majority consensus - in order to define reality in blatantly self-interested terms. That is what they are so skilled at doing.
What is the point of speaking if not to effect a change on something? Is it just to hear the sound of your own voice?
I guess for a lot of people it is.
You can effect change morally and honestly, with an eye towards fostering positive development for both yourself and society. Cooperation, collaboration, mutual pursuit of a sustainable understanding that reliably maps onto our shared Darwinian reality. That’s frequently how language is used in homogenous high trust societies.
The purpose of speaking is to impart information. Your purpose in imparting that information, and even it's accuracy is case by case.
There’s something to be said for wordsmiths/ linguists like Tolkien, but their intelligence showed through their writing, versus their writing being phrased to appear intelligent. Overall I would agree, no one believes the “used car salesman” is intelligent except those he cons through deception.
The "high verbal IQ minority" meme is a straight lie. Pick up a copy of the 1994 book The Bell Curve. The authors are libs who spend hundreds of pages embarrassingly admitting race realism. There's an aside at one point talking about stereotypes. They have a throwaway line, something along the lines of "and, of course, everyone knows jews are notoriously low intelligence." The high verbal IQ meme is an invention of the 21st century.
It’s an inherently retarded assertion. He’s basically saying that guns are created for robbing banks. Truth is critically important in socialization. But hey, maybe someone with a genetic predisposition for dishonesty would struggle to conceive of truth and logic as valid facets of communication. On some level, it’s like we’re trying to explain internal monologue to those who don’t have one. They can’t conceive of not actively subverting you.
Do I really have to add qualifiers and exceptions to the rules in an already wordy tldr so people won't assume I'm reasoning backwards or making wild ass guesses about confusing phenomena like a simpleton? Your interpretation of my words is on the level of TRUMP TOLD PEOPLE TO DRINK BLEACH... I'm not even making an assertion here really, and I could be persuaded to change my opinion. This was not my first assumption at all, but an understanding arrived at after years of watching how people use language. Modern men who built working societies added more expressions of truth to culture and our languages. Someone assuming that must mean primitive man always had such capability, or that all functioning humans now do... well that reminds me of this analogy I heard one time about guns and banks.
Provide one level then. The most basic forms of primitive communication that express reality would be survival based like 'don't go in that jungle a demon panther lives there', or 'the season is changing, stock food', or telling the history of the village which may or may not be true and still improve the survival chances of offspring. I will concede only that White men living in harsh environments over time will have developed more concepts and words for truth, planning, and logic than jungle tribes.
I remain thoroughly unimpressed by the famed "high verbal IQ" of the jew when all it is ever used for is to bullshit people and avoid facing the simple truth of anything and everything.
High IQ cuts through the bullshit, not shower in it.
They are losing control of the narrative. And the harder they try to cling on, the more they lose control.
You cannot maintain a society-wide paradigm of White guilt and suicidal empathy once Whites are no longer the vast majority ( down to a dwindling minority of young adults and children in North America ).
Even if you manage to keep the dwindling White group brainwashed, the non-Whites were never held to the same standart ( thou shalt never indulge in in-group preference ) and will never accept it.
Isn't Hannania kike a genuine pedophile faggot?
And apparently he's part of the Twitter team too, probably ADL or Mossad plant
To answer his question, there are no right wing jews because their values of anti-Whiteness is simply incompatible with the majority of Americans
They will always undermine Whites, its their nature to undermine societies and push for degeneracy and disharmony between the races because it allows them to gain control while everyone is busy hating each other
Maybe people would have been more supportive of your country if you didn’t spend every waking minute making the US worse.
Most of the pro-Jewish replies are fantastic justifications for antisemitism lol
"So far..."
Painful? It's wonderful.
Nope, and it's great. ETA: Actually, as the replies pointed out, Dave Smith is an example. I can't imagine a Jew that isn't strongly critical of Israel becoming a big influence though.
I disagree with this. Jews are actually quite adept at tard wrangling but struggle against intelligent opposition. The reason they are struggling now is that even the tards know too much now.
I get that the writer was probably trying to aim this at "the right", but hilariously both the vice signalling and tribal grunts fit with noticed behaviour these days.
I'm watching Fuentes lackies attack right wingers for not being pro ebt so congratulations the jews have gotten the right to accept socialism
Where?
Twitter and Instagram
Every major political personality has an ulterior motive, and is clear Fuentes is here to get people back on the Democrat plantation
"The bots" You fucking faggot npcs worship the most obvious plant on the internet but we are bots. Lmao.you accused me of lying without a seconds hesitation. Apparently my lying eyes were not seeing groypers screaming that ebt needed to go through or else it wasn't Christian of muh fellow right wingers
All over Twitter you fucking retard
Fuentes is not the right or even of the right.
I haven't ever watched Shapiro's show either, but one has but to peruse his twitter to realize that he's a happy little minion of clown world.
Hell it's even the same playbook they did with Shapiro, who rose to prominence after the murder of Andrew Breitbart.
You should watch his videos.
I don't know who this Dick is, so I goggled this Dick. It tells me he is a white nationalist. Why is a white nationalist bemoaning the exclusion of jews?
He is a race realist but is explicitly opposed to White nationalism.