Depends. Was the pilot a White male?
The AA flight was, I believe, the first one with a (significant?) number of casualties for quite a while.
You mean first AA flight in a while? First flight for a while in the United States"? Because worldwide we had the Korean crash landing not long ago, and of course that plane most likely accidentally shot down by Russia but you probably weren't considering acts of war.
I noticed the same thing, artists on the left and right are concerned about the effects of AI but only the ones on the left are screeching about their artwork being stolen and how we need new laws against AI. The ones on the right are figuring out how they can pivot to take advantage of the newly forming economy.
Awesome retro Japanese style. If only it had some Japanese people in it.
Preemptive pardons aren't even a thing. It's never been challenged.
Taking R&D out of the picture Vision+LIDAR sensors would be more expensive than Vision alone but still Musk always believed and is adamant that perfecting vision-based navigation is essential for the development of automation in general. The fork in the road and all that. It's not only about driving. I don't think saving money was a big reason.
I don't really care, personally. I'm somewhat in the middle between some of the comments here.
Lmao don't think you can hide up on that fencepost, u/AndurilElessar is still putting you on the pedo list! Any more nuance from you and you're going to face the wall.
HH and shalom my niggas! #WhiteBoySummer
How are the victim and her family reacting? Are they calling for more severe charges to be pressed or are they on the side of fellow blacks making it blackity black issue? That will determine how much I care. Very much like the men in women's sports issue. When the women forfeit games and publicly denounce troons I support them. If the women stand on a pedestal with the man in drag, I applaud their teeth getting knocked the fuck out Randy Savage style.
Why upset? She dindu nuffin!
You mean well meaning but naive normies, right? Because liberal NPCs believe whatever they are told - like "Elon Musk is Nazi." Or maybe to your point they wouldn't have believed it until they were shown a picture of him doing a "nazi salute" and that was the key evidence they needed.
There's no good filter setting that runs automatically without intervention. You just need an active mod who reviews the logs and can "unban" legit users right away.
u/GangstaTrump below looks like a reasonable poster who didn't even know his comments were being hidden.
I don't recall ever seeing him getting filtered... he stopped around the time filters got ridiculously strict.
You don't see any flaw in these statements? :D
Either you're wrong and you just didn't notice his new alts because he didn't bring up Brooke Shields before getting filtered, or you're right and he stopped posting because the filter slowed him down. (which is all Knight_Of_Saint_John claimed)
I have no problems using it when the alternative would be no answer. Just understand it's merely a very useful summarizer that you have to keep on a short leash and strangle when it misbehaves. That's why I made it put APA citations so we could all go and verify. Otherwise it will happily hallucinate sources.
Honestly even with the problems LLM could replace all tertiary sources like wikipedia and we'd be no worse off. You're getting bias either way.
It was explicitly in her case that the judge declared the evidence be sealed for national security reasons and also to protect the delicate sensibilities of the public.
I got banned for "reporting people too much"
Sounds like still reddit isn't fully complying with the law then. Your testimony may be useful in the coming DOJ lawsuit.
I saw this movie so long ago I completely forgot the premise. People used to write "Single White Female" etc in classifieds to find the roommate that matched them best. That privilege is only extended to beautiful ethnic peoples of color now.
Don't forget, any bar that allows Nazis is Nazi Bar!
I grokked it. I had to make it rewrite the answer twice to ignore claims of antisemutisms.
Evidence Supporting Frank's Guilt
The prosecution's case rested primarily on the following contemporary evidence: Jim Conley's Testimony:
Conley, a janitor with a history of chain gang service, testified that Frank asked him to help move Phagan's body after Frank killed her. He detailed Frank's actions, including writing the murder notes to mislead investigators.
This testimony was central, with Conley claiming Frank dictated the notes, as corroborated by a contemporary article from the Atlanta Constitution on August 10, 1913, detailing his account (Negro Sweeper Tells the Story of Murder Notes).
Last Known Interaction:
Frank admitted in his trial testimony that he was the last to see Phagan alive, handing her the pay envelope and answering her query about metal arrival, as per his statement on August 18, 1913 (Testimony of Leo Frank).
Circumstantial Evidence:
A blood-smeared shirt was found in a burn barrel, initially thought to be planted by Frank to frame someone else, as noted in police reports and trial discussions (Leo Frank Case).
The murder notes, with their poor grammar, were linked to Conley's writing ability, supporting the prosecution's narrative, as seen in trial evidence (Murder Notes: Key Evidence).
Behavioral Observations:
Frank's nervous behavior during early investigations, such as changing his story about Newt Lee's time card, was noted in contemporary police reports, raising suspicion (The Complete Leo Frank Trial Statement).
Evidence Against Frank's Guilt
The defense presented several points from contemporary sources to counter the claim of Frank's guilt:
Inconsistencies in Conley's Testimony:
Conley provided at least four contradictory affidavits before settling on his trial testimony, with cross-examinations highlighting discrepancies, as documented in trial transcripts (Leo Frank Case).
His history of lying and chain gang service was noted, undermining his reliability, as seen in contemporary newspaper reports (Testimony in the Leo Frank Trial).
Lack of Direct Physical Evidence:
No blood, fingerprints, or other forensic evidence directly linked Frank to the crime scene, as argued by the defense during the trial, with contemporary forensic reports noting untested bloody fingerprints on a basement door (The Trial of Leo Frank: An Account).
Hair found on a lathe was not conclusively identified as Phagan's, as per trial testimony, weakening the prosecution's case (Leo Frank - Wikipedia).
Frank's Alibi:
Frank testified he was busy with accounting work, supported by exhibits of his financial sheets, indicating he was occupied during the estimated time of the murder, as per his August 18, 1913, testimony (Testimony of Leo Frank). Colleagues, like Herbert G. Schiff, corroborated his workload, as noted in trial testimony (The Leo Frank Case). New Evidence Not Available at the Trial One significant piece of evidence emerged later, which was not available during the 1913 trial:
Alonzon Mann's 1982 Testimony:
In 1982, Alonzon Mann, Frank's former office boy, stated in an interview with The Tennessean that he saw Jim Conley carrying Phagan's body to the basement on the day of the murder, with Conley threatening to kill him if he spoke out (An Innocent Man Was Lynched). Mann's mother advised him to keep silent, and he did so until 1982, making this testimony new evidence not presented at the trial. This supports the theory that Conley, not Frank, was the murderer.
Key Citations
Atlanta Constitution. (1913, August 10). Negro sweeper tells the story of murder notes. The Leo Frank Case Research Library. https://www.leofrank.org/negro-sweeper-tells-the-story-of-murder-notes/
Frank, L. M. (1913, August 18). Testimony of Leo Frank. Famous Trials. https://www.famous-trials.com/leo-frank/14-excerpts/48-testimonyfrank
Georgia Encyclopedia. (n.d.). Leo Frank case. Georgia Humanities. https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/leo-frank-case/
Famous Trials. (n.d.). Murder notes: Key evidence in the Leo Frank case. https://famous-trials.com/leo-frank/30-evidence
Famous Trials. (n.d.). Testimony in the Leo Frank trial. https://www.famous-trials.com/leo-frank/33-testimony-in-the-leo-frank-trial
Famous Trials. (n.d.). The trial of Leo Frank: An account. https://www.famous-trials.com/leo-frank/27-home
Conley, J. (1913). Testimony of Jim Conley. Famous Trials. https://www.famous-trials.com/leo-frank/14-excerpts/44-conleytestimony
Frank, L. M. (1913, August 18). The complete Leo Frank trial statement delivered on August 18, 1913. The Leo Frank Case Research Library. https://www.leofrank.org/trial-and-evidence/defense/leo-m-frank/
University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law. (n.d.). Leo Frank trial home. http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/frank/frankmain.html
Mann, A. (2020, February 20). An innocent man was lynched. The Tennessean. https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/local/2020/02/20/alonzo-mann-says-jim-conley-murdered-mary-phagan/4819312002/
University of Pittsburgh. (n.d.). The Leo Frank case. https://pitt.libguides.com/c.php?g=707704&p=5026946
Am I the only one cynically thinking all the screeching about Epstein might be a red herring? People are acting like he was running the op and she was his friend/assistant when to me it looks to be the complete opposite with her facilitating connections around the world while he was just a manager who met the customers and partook in his own product, and was always intended to be the fall guy if it was exposed.
It would be stupid but I can imagine a govt official in the future saying "Yes we released all the Epstein files. No, the declassification didn't include all Maxwell files, that was never promised. She is no longer under investigation. That was in the past and her boss the actual ringleader is dead. Let it go." We might be getting close to a statement like that actually because I've seen comments from Trump supporters asking "What are you expecting them to do anyway? Epstein is dead and they aren't gonna show us child porn."
Somebody like Elon needs to buy it and gradually close the vice on leftists like they did on normal people, but also let them keep their own heavily monitored btard style cesspit of communist degenerates. The individual subreddit format is perfect for that. Hell I'd even let them have their own version of a front page that they think is connected to the search engines but is effectively shadowbanned and disconnected from the real world. Freedom of speech not freedom of reach.
you'd have better luck by allowing open mockery of it
The Internet enabled them in the first place and they'd still be their fursonas online and at meetups even if they kept it secret at school. Then again making it illegal at school only accomplishes the same.
Top Gun Maverick was alright especially if you liked the original.
So if I donate money to your political campaign, and also donate to NiggerFaggots For Man-Boy Love International, that means you now have financial ties to NiggerFaggots For Man-Boy Love International! Good to know.
Not unless something was a big media-generated controversy or the publisher was actually involved in a lawsuit. American defamation law is famously weak for famous people.