Would be better if it was archive.org so we don't have to do these CAPTCHAs all the time. archive.is was using the CAPTCHA page to DDoS another website that discussed the webmaster's identity. It could still be DDoSing for all I know.
I suppose you're either statistically challenged, forgot what you said or you know you misrepresented the statistics and are trying to pretend you didn't. A quarter of women who self-reported a history of same-sex sexual contact is very different from a quarter of heterosexual women.
This new link you posted doesn't have any discernible connection to your argument. It's results from a survey about all kinds of things, one of which is that 5% of people identify as bisexual - 15% for Gen Z adults. Nothing about bisexuality among women.
No one said all or most women are bisexual.
That is the propaganda though.
Exhibit A: https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/106qdcy/all_women_are_bi/
Statistics are usually manipulated, but if you like trusting the experts here's some statistics that show bisexuals are rare: https://worldmetrics.org/bisexuality-statistics/
Approximately 1.3% of U.S. adults identify as bisexual, according to the 2021 General Social Survey (GSS)
60.4% of bisexual identified individuals in the U.S. are women, 35.8% are men, and 3.8% are non-binary, from 2019 Pew Research
Even if you assume all the "non-binaries" are women, that means women identifying as bisexual are 0.83% of the US adult population and thus about 1.7% of the US women. A tiny number.
If we look at sexual activity instead you'll get higher numbers that include lesbians. For example the same GSS found
the percentage of women who have had sex with at least one woman increased from 3.6% [1973] to 8.7% [2014].
https://www.socialworktoday.com/news/dn_060116.shtml
But the NSFG from 2011-2013 found
Among women, 17 percent reported having intimate same-sex contact in their lives, compared to 6 percent of men.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/more-women-report-same-sex-relationships/
But "intimate same sex contact" could include kissing and molestation, not just a consensual act of "lesbian sex".
Are you an AI bot? Or just not taking the time to read? The study says the same thing as the article, not what you're saying.
Most women may sleep around a lot, but few of them are attracted to other women so they only sleep around with men. The point is that bisexual women are rare, contrary to propaganda about all or most women being bisexual.
25% of women who identify exclusively as heterosexual still experimented in college sleeping with other women
That's not what your link says. It says "One in 4 women whose most recent hookup was with a partner of the same sex identify as straight." That's very different. It's not hard to believe that 1 in 4 lesbian and bisexual women are retarded, but it's much less believable that 1 in 4 women (who are biologically attracted to masculinity, at least without pills) who call themselves straight actually sleep with other women.
The idea that lots of women are bisexual is propaganda. I don't see any of these bisexual women, unless it means those we normally consider lesbians. But lesbians are still quite rare fortunately and easy to spot anyway.
His X post is just repeating what he was already saying before. Pretty much everyone reading it will already know the answers to his questions. But now he's encouraging people to put their faith in Grok. AI is going to be much worse for us than any Jews have been.
Jeff Yass appears to be libertarian, nationalist and pro-Israel. Presumably he donated to Massie because he's libertarian, but potentially he could have influenced him to be more pro-Israel.
According to Wikipedia Jeff Yass is a registered Libertarian and in 2021
the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that Jeff Yass and Arthur Dantchik were behind a large portion of the donations to the Kohelet Policy Forum [in Israel], whose worldview is based on nationalism, low taxes and market freedom
Also according to Haaretz, Yass is a major supporter of Israeli right-wing think tanks.[32] In April 2024, The Guardian reported that Jeff Yass donated $16 million to anti-Muslim and pro-Israel groups.[34]
He said it was more than just surveillance. He mentioned social media and dating apps. These replace normal human interaction. Marriage, sex and baby making have all declined because we have less real life interaction with potential partners. Because most interaction with people is now online, which has also made people more socially awkward if they do meet in person and they are likely to be on their phones instead of talking.
The problem is that digital ID can be implemented behind the scenes and then people will barely notice and it wouldn't affect Reform if they allowed that to happen. It is in fact already the plan to turn existing IDs into digital IDs by forcing employers to digitally verify IDs through the government. Farage having personally suffered from something doesn't mean he will be against it. Look at Trump and FISA.
I wish you were right about things changing but I don't think Reform will be much different. They're the usual flip-flopping conservatives who make an appearance of conserving yesterday's progressivism (and failing) instead of doing anything meaningful or undoing all the damage that was done over the previous generations.
Even if an employer doesn’t require the new ID, remember the UK government said that all IDs will soon have to be verified digitally. That suggests the employer will send the ID image or data to a government server which will respond with whether the person is allowed to work. So all IDs will essentially be turned into digital IDs and the government can make individuals unemployable if they do something the government doesn’t like.
Totally agree. But it's possible that the encrapification of the internet will drive people away from it. I can hope.