The "free market" is one of those labels you can apply to anything, including the crony capitalist nightmare that passes for the US economy these days. If that's what he's talking about by all means take a blowtorch to it.
This. A "free market" now that all the monopolies and duopolies are established is just a corporatocracy. Capitalism with incentives for competition and innovation would be the ideal. A true "free market" wouldn't involve lobbying for regulatory capture to drive your competitors bankrupt with lawfare.
He said we needed to adopt the lefts position on economics ie socialism and then eventually communism. He spent the first part complaining about leftist institutions like silicone valley and his solution is to give them more power
The only reason silicon valley exists is govenrment intervention and cronyism.
Its always amazing to watch retards proclaim their love of free market economics by pledging undying support of the government shielding every rich fuck from their appropriate liability.
"cApItAl CaRrIEs ThE rIsK sO tHeY gEt bla balah blah blah" yeah fuck you and your fake risk.
you already have a free market, the too-big-to-fails have free reign to freely profit off of you and freely shut down all of your avenues for competition. take insulin for example: are you going to spend the hundreds of millions required to make a cheaper, less marked up alternative to the current sources, when there's already a well-established monopolist with all the industry connections you'll have to overcome?
You don't need 'industry connections' to make a chemical. The only reason there is a monopoly is because of patents -> government intervention
If I set up the bare minimum factory installation needed to produce insulin, it would be illegal because of safety rules and numerous other regs -> government intervention
Its been manipulated for a long time, posts with zero comments will get a dozen upvotes and completely obvious shills/brigaders will magically get 5+ upvotes while everyone dunks on and mocks them.
Matt, for as much as you may disagree with or hate him, has always been consistent in his beliefs going back years and if anyone is manipulating in his favor its completely against the norm for the types we know act here.
We have had people cop to it in the past, and others bring beef from other .wins. At least one guy openly admit to trying to sway discussion through constant spam.
Overall its meaninglessly small if you aren't easily fooled by "he said the word I like!" unless you really care about up/downvotes.
I watched the video and I didn't see where he said anything about socialism. He talked at the end about money in politics, which is something basically anyone who isn't a fucking jew or a libtard would agree with.
I think we should unite with the left because Israel is the biggest threat out there and I really don't care about anything else until they're dealt with. We can hash out the economy afterwards.
Nick has a tendency to toss out these theoretical power blocs without actually considering the real world implications. He did this with Christians and Muslims recently too. In both cases, he misses the obvious: yes, Christians and Muslims have some "based trad values" in common. Yes, the dissident left and right factions both align with hating Israel, the perpetual war machine, and Wall st criminality. You know what the points of difference are in both these examples? Literally fucking everything else
There can be no coexistence with muslims or shitlibs. I'm not even saying that to sound tough on the internet. The ideals of both these dichotomous situations are completely and utterly antithetical to each other.
So no, Nick, we can't ever be friends with leftists. We won't ever hold hands with Muslims and be based together. Frankly, these are the things he says that make me think he might actually be compromised, not any spicy thing he said about cookies half a decade ago.
He does say that the left needs to give up it's anti-white and pro-brown stance. If they left gave that up they would be pretty tolerable. Safety nets, healthcare, education, none of that shit matters if it is all privatized or all government. The only thing that matters it the removal of all brown people, and self governance.
I'm long over the college freshman phase of supporting absolute "free market capitalism". maybe some social safety net/health care for (white) people who actually need it is good for society. Maybe people deserve to live where they grew up and not be forced to chase the next economic zone just to satisfy Judeo-cons need for gdp growth.
The "free market" is one of those labels you can apply to anything, including the crony capitalist nightmare that passes for the US economy these days. If that's what he's talking about by all means take a blowtorch to it.
This. A "free market" now that all the monopolies and duopolies are established is just a corporatocracy. Capitalism with incentives for competition and innovation would be the ideal. A true "free market" wouldn't involve lobbying for regulatory capture to drive your competitors bankrupt with lawfare.
He said we needed to adopt the lefts position on economics ie socialism and then eventually communism. He spent the first part complaining about leftist institutions like silicone valley and his solution is to give them more power
The only reason silicon valley exists is govenrment intervention and cronyism.
Its always amazing to watch retards proclaim their love of free market economics by pledging undying support of the government shielding every rich fuck from their appropriate liability.
"cApItAl CaRrIEs ThE rIsK sO tHeY gEt bla balah blah blah" yeah fuck you and your fake risk.
It's literally in this video. Are you incapable of watching a 5 minute video
Free market isn't even real, that commie gimp FDR killed it back in the 30s. We've had a partially centrally planned mixed market economy ever since.
So... why do we have to give up on it? Shouldn't we be fighting to have it back?
you already have a free market, the too-big-to-fails have free reign to freely profit off of you and freely shut down all of your avenues for competition. take insulin for example: are you going to spend the hundreds of millions required to make a cheaper, less marked up alternative to the current sources, when there's already a well-established monopolist with all the industry connections you'll have to overcome?
You don't need 'industry connections' to make a chemical. The only reason there is a monopoly is because of patents -> government intervention
If I set up the bare minimum factory installation needed to produce insulin, it would be illegal because of safety rules and numerous other regs -> government intervention
No, not a free market.
This was a comment about how both parties and the lugenpresse constantly lie about the nature of our economy, not about Fuentes.
Its been manipulated for a long time, posts with zero comments will get a dozen upvotes and completely obvious shills/brigaders will magically get 5+ upvotes while everyone dunks on and mocks them.
Matt, for as much as you may disagree with or hate him, has always been consistent in his beliefs going back years and if anyone is manipulating in his favor its completely against the norm for the types we know act here.
Is it manipulation, or just the fact that KiA2 appears in the .win/All pages? I'm sure we get plenty of drive-bys.
We have had people cop to it in the past, and others bring beef from other .wins. At least one guy openly admit to trying to sway discussion through constant spam.
Overall its meaninglessly small if you aren't easily fooled by "he said the word I like!" unless you really care about up/downvotes.
Are you a Canuck? "If we kill the enemy then we lose." Or in this case "If we don't adopt the enemies ideology we lose."
Enemies of greedy bankers, landlords and capitalists are not my enemies.
If they call them that one other thing.
Seems good to me. Nigger boomers malding.
I watched the video and I didn't see where he said anything about socialism. He talked at the end about money in politics, which is something basically anyone who isn't a fucking jew or a libtard would agree with.
Did you miss where the mother fucker said we needed to cede to left wing economics in exchange for right wing immigration policies.
He names state healthcare and social nets as examples.
I think we should unite with the left because Israel is the biggest threat out there and I really don't care about anything else until they're dealt with. We can hash out the economy afterwards.
I've been getting recommendations for tyt because they're commenting on the Fuentes interview 😂
We can use the brown shitskin lefties as cannon fodder against the zogbots
Modern solutions
Nick has a tendency to toss out these theoretical power blocs without actually considering the real world implications. He did this with Christians and Muslims recently too. In both cases, he misses the obvious: yes, Christians and Muslims have some "based trad values" in common. Yes, the dissident left and right factions both align with hating Israel, the perpetual war machine, and Wall st criminality. You know what the points of difference are in both these examples? Literally fucking everything else
There can be no coexistence with muslims or shitlibs. I'm not even saying that to sound tough on the internet. The ideals of both these dichotomous situations are completely and utterly antithetical to each other.
So no, Nick, we can't ever be friends with leftists. We won't ever hold hands with Muslims and be based together. Frankly, these are the things he says that make me think he might actually be compromised, not any spicy thing he said about cookies half a decade ago.
He does say that the left needs to give up it's anti-white and pro-brown stance. If they left gave that up they would be pretty tolerable. Safety nets, healthcare, education, none of that shit matters if it is all privatized or all government. The only thing that matters it the removal of all brown people, and self governance.
So, if they went back to how they were before the civil rights era and started advocating for the working class again?
I'm long over the college freshman phase of supporting absolute "free market capitalism". maybe some social safety net/health care for (white) people who actually need it is good for society. Maybe people deserve to live where they grew up and not be forced to chase the next economic zone just to satisfy Judeo-cons need for gdp growth.
There needs to be countries for average white guys.
so is socialism, but national?
:)
Maybe a catchy name like social nationalism
ah yes, another 4 minutes of low IQ takes for the pseudo intellectuals to repeat.
Heh heh. Fuentes. Backdoor.
But yeah, "the right" should adopt a nationalist form of socialism. A third position if you will.