I watched the video, here is my critique for those who are interested.

TLDR:

The woman is attempting to use two different types of defense simultaneously:

*. Technical defense (ballistic argument, messages argument)

and

*. Conspiracy defense (the FBI framing an innocent argument).

The problem is that her conspiracy argument is too weak to cover the physical evidence. Suppose the FBI is persecuting the suspect. For the FBI to "frame" someone, they must plant evidence. If the FBI planted the DNA on the roof and the cloth, discarded graffiti cartridges, etc., then the FBI went to a great deal of trouble to simulate a crime scene, why then would they overlook the actual weapon (which the woman admits belongs to the suspect)? If the FBI were going through the effort of framing a case, they would have planted the DNA on a weapon that matched the ballistic profile on the victim, making their case airtight. she repeats the same mistake over and over.

full details:

1. The woman claims the video of the assassin running away shows no weapon, but the weapon was found in a woodland wrapped in a black cloth, and the video shows the assassin escaping carrying with him a rifle in a black cloth the video is just very shitty. In addition, the assassin holds the black cloth while jumping from the roof instead of throwing it away and picking it up later, which is a strange behavior complicating a dangerous jump. Furthermore, the black cloth holds a rigid shape that sags only after the middle; clothes sagging that way can only be explained in two ways: the cloth was wrapping something, or the cloth was a very rigid kind of fabric that partially holds its shape when sewn into an indument. Nobody believed the guy was carrying a winter black jacket in summer

2. The woman takes a snippet from the defense's report but speaks of it like it is a definitive and impartial report

3. The woman dismisses the DNA of the suspected assassin found on the weapon with the following arguments:

*. Your weapon normally has your DNA on it,

and

*. If she claims the FBI is persecuting the suspect, then it automatically does not matter.

The woman's dismissal of the DNA in this way crushes her thesis because:

DNA was found on the roof and on the cloth wrapping the weapon.

She is arguing that the FBI is trying to frame someone and is capable of planting DNA on the crime scene, but at the same time, the FBI overlooked the weapon, instead of also planting DNA on a suitable weapon.

4. The woman claims that there is no evidence that the shot was fired on the specific roof the assassin was recorded running away from, despite being the most logical position. She states that multiple eyewitnesses claim differently, but the example we got show is and old, uncertain woman.

5. The woman claims that a gun expert claims the bullet could not do that damage. These 3 videos I found on youtube very easily utterly destroy all her technical evaluation in her video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53-EVpzJ3D0. and argument https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cm4tVepZ3XE and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZ_301AQl_U

6. Surveillance video gap. This is a good argument, but in the press conference, after the shooting, it was said that it was a portion of the video. I suspect it is just minutes of the suspect lying flat.

7. The woman performs a red herring. The culprit was found this way: the parent recognized him in the photos released by the FBI, talked with him, grew suspicious, or found out he was the shooter, called a detective who was their friend, and that guy called the sheriff.

8. The woman claims that the messages left that incriminate the suspect must have been planted by the FBI because they sound too strange or convenient. Because, again, this woman is arguing technical defense and conspiracy defense at the same time, her argument falls apart quite soon because obscure references to video games were found on the cartridges. Either the FBI has internet-savvy experts making meme references and therefore must also be able to write believable incriminating posts, or the FBI is too inept, and the cartridge source must be the suspect only.

9. Various conspiracy theories yadda yadda

10. Woman tries to profile the suspect, and doing so exposes her lack of expertise in assessing tranny, leftie, or even just midwits. Also, fuck that layer speech priming.

11. Yes, Kirk was getting critical of israel behavior is on stream, but sources told me that Kirk inside the oval office said... lmao

12. closure. The woman is arguing that the suspect cannot be the killer because the timing of the killing would have been convenient for someone else with an interest (israel), while the life prospects of the suspect were good, and it would be too hard to believe he would be willing to do the killing. This argument would get you raped in the courtroom. Ask AI why.

anarcho tyranny

globohomo seem to be trying to create their george soros grafting all the enmity they got trying to control the world onto palantir

Why are you posting this globohomo shill here?

plausible.

My opinion of taco is: taco is only used when it can be spun as trump lacking firmness.

Taco is leftie speech double thinking, so they can claim that trump is the true hitler and needs to be stopped by any means, but at the same time, he is also a powerless man that cannot do anything. both contraddictory beleif held at the same time.

Just wait 2 weeks, so that the NPCs perform memory eviction, free ram space for the new cycle of news.

... what has he got?

If not himself, then he has naught

To say the things he truly feels

And not the words of one who kneels

do not establish what is happening in politic by relying on "quotes" out of context on twatter.

do not establish what is happening in politic by relying on the interpretation of such "quotes" by xenophiles that hate the white race on twitter with an agenda.

like with clickbaits they don't expect people to actually read the articles, so with mangle quotes, they don't expect you to check the video/image they add in their post, they know they can trick the minds of enough viewers that their quotes that they ahve written really have been said or really meant what they are trying to pass.

factpost are pratically shills

based post

good.

the part about the hearing of epstein files is made up, though

is called the black pill because it is the realization that all that was taught to you about how the world worked is false. fake and gay. while the things they told you were wrong were correct. you got sold how the world was supposed to be, instead how it was. and the realization is bleak.

ps. fuck out all immigrants if it has to be collapse, let the jungle countries collapse first.

until proven otherwise.

Does this mean that he spends the rest of his life in a containment ward?

vaxxed

aaron rupar is a giant massive globohoimo shill.

never pick tranny shit + war in iran over just war in iran. not happening.

I don't understand

clockete clock

merkel importer of voters

violates the First Amendment

the guy had an account on istagram or tiktok (i don't remember) with him counting money and posing as a pimp claiming to make money easily with western girls. not even xenophiles can save him.

we wuz

Author claims is getting banned on Steam because some HR woman want some kind of loicense for the game to mock corporations.

Could be true... could be the author playing a marketing stunt, I'm not decided yet

4chan thread is here: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/528908234/#528908234

game look ilarious btw

https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1771641953516175.png

https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1771642124549485.png

https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1771642449128540.png

https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1771642706534321.png

it is so dead lmao

initially I though he wanted to prevent israel/jews being exposed, but now I have begun to think is may have been done on purpose 5Dchess style, "trumpo is in the files, epstein did not kill himself and mbama hoax". is like you put a giant magnet on it.

and as soon trump is found to have gone against epstein 2006, reducing some of the grip. then they started talking again about is time to move on about epstein.

I wonder. i wonder.

Persona is the same software all globalists are using for the ID identification thingy, see the UK and etc. The connection with Peter Thiel is tenuous. Persona is funded by "Founder Fund", a venture capital trust that Thiel was one of the founders of in 2004; now he only has a face role there.

why is it important to note? because "Funder Funds" funds basically everything related to technology, especially AI and cutting-edge, and because globalists and Thiel are opponents in the battle for the "new internet." Palantir provide service of data analysis and predictions; they use their AI to produce. The mojo of the company claims that they can provide information to governments and firms with thy AI prediction without the need to violate civil liberties.

If the governments are successful in locking down the internet and implementing digital ID, then they know everything you do by tracking your ID or other things they can impose. If governments have all the infos, services such palantir lose their market niche, so they have a vested interest in the internet not getting locked down.

The conclusion is, globalists want a locked-down internet, forcing discord into it, but if they caught fire, they have some writer writing a propaganda piece to blame it on their opponents, who do not want locked-down internet.

This is rather duplicious.