Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

66
Canada is now taxing streaming services to “fund local content” (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 2 years ago by Ahaus667 2 years ago by Ahaus667 +66 / -0
49 comments download share
49 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (49)
sorted by:
▲ 33 ▼
– GamingTheSystem-01 33 points 2 years ago +33 / -0

A lot of woke nonsense projects are funded by the canadian government. Not ESG investment fund style, they just straight up give money to retards. Goodbye Volcano High is the one that comes to mind, but I know I've seen others.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– HallucinatoryBeing 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0

Goodbye Volcano High

It's hilarious how a bunch of shitposters made a better fan game with Ren'Py ahead of the actual game.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Salixion 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I'll never touch the official game

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– subbookkeeper 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

funded by taxing other woke nonsense. Ironic.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 14 points 2 years ago +14 / -0

https://archive.ph/RSQwM

By modernizing this framework, streaming services can now “make meaningful contributions to Canadian and Indigenous content.” “Based on the public record, the CRTC is requiring online streaming services to contribute 5% of their Canadian revenues to support the Canadian broadcasting system. These obligations will start in the 2024-2025 broadcast year and will provide an estimated $200 million per year in new funding,” the Government of Canada said. This funding will be “directed to areas of immediate need” such as local news on radio and television, French-language content, Indigenous content, and content created by and for equity-deserving communities, official language minority communities, and Canadians of diverse backgrounds,” the Government of Canada said.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– simian 23 points 2 years ago +23 / -0

I’m missing the part where this is the private companies’ responsibility, or why the taxes they pay aren’t covering this need already. Obviously, this will just result in a 5% increase in everyone’s fees (worldwide, I’m sure, not just Canada). But I wouldn’t be surprised to see these services just pull out of Canada altogether, for fear of this shit setting a precedent.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– ghostfox1_ 16 points 2 years ago +16 / -0

I wish they would tbh. It'd be hilarious to see Netflix et al cancel shit in Canada and put up a website saying "your government is the reason why we're unavailable, good luck".

But they're all woke trash, and won't care.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– YesMovement 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

They'll just put it as a surcharge or an excuse to jack up the rates.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AgilePickle1123 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Probably will just jack up the price 10% and not give a single explanation. Which is fine, I’ll just sail the seven seas like I always do

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– HallucinatoryBeing 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

5.26%. If you want the customer to completely pay for the tax and not eat into your bottom line, you divide revenue by .95, not multiply by 1.05.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Still technically incorrect, they they would recursively need to both pay taxes on that additional 5%, and pay the new 5% tax on it as well, since it's a fee increase.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– HallucinatoryBeing 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

That's what the 0.26% covers, the additional revenue from hiking the price.

Say your revenue before this tax was $100, just to use easy numbers.

  • A flat 5% increase: 100 x 1.05 = 105. New revenue taxed: 105 x 0.05 = 5.25. $0.25 in the red.
  • A 5.26% increase: 100 x 1.0526 = 105.26. New revenue taxed: 105.26 x 0.05 = 5.26. Back to the old "real" revenue.

Of course, there's nothing stopping a company from hiking prices higher, but hiking by 5.26% is the absolute minimum to break even.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– simian 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

STFU, nerd!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– jvardrake 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Well, someone has to fund the the CBC leftist propaganda outlet.

Seriously. That's all this is. People are probably choosing to watch less TV, which means those indoctrination shows/channels are bringing less money from the commercials they run. Thus, the money has to be forcefully extracted somewhere else.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– ghostfox1_ 16 points 2 years ago +16 / -0

It's almost like content from those things isn't consumed because it's bad or something.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– APDSmith 12 points 2 years ago +12 / -0

Ahh, corporate welfare. For when you thought that socialism and fascism weren't quite bad enough in isolation, so figured to combine them into some Frankenstein social experiment.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Eltrion 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

No, This is the CRTC (a regulator), that was the CBC (a broadcaster). It's all the same shit at the end of the day though, the Canadian government is incredibly corrupt when it comes to this sort of thing.

They're all either owned by the government, or rely on the government for so much of their funding that they may as well be

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 11 points 2 years ago +11 / -0

And those services being cut off in Canada in 3, 2, 1...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– simian 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0

It’s like that old joke “socialism works until you run out of other peoples’ money.”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– realerfunction 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

i just got to the part in atlas shrugged where they're starting to run out of other people's stuff to steal.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– HallucinatoryBeing 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Muh food deserts.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– fauxgnaws 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

They'll just charge Canadians more.

$15 Netflix in US will be $20 Netflix in Canada.

Just another tax on dumb people who can't figure out how to pay for US Netflix or safely torrent.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– TomSeeSaw 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

dumb people

pay for netflix

I believe I have cracked the case.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

I don't know as how are they working out this percentage to tax?

If this is their GLOBAL income, they'll leave, immediately. No amount of price hike justifies ONE country demanding a set percentage out of their entire international income.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– fauxgnaws 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

That'd have to be some kind of world trade / nafta violation.

"ordered large online streaming services to pay 5 percent of their Canadian revenue"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Which is $40 Netflix in Canadian dollars.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 11 points 2 years ago +11 / -0

if my two second research is correct, Canada already has VAT. they literally already take revenue from streaming services.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– HallucinatoryBeing 15 points 2 years ago +15 / -0

No, this is tax on top of the tax, so you can tax while you tax.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– BoberFett 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

Yo dawg I heard you like taxes...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– PooperSnooperPrime 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

The IRS has entered the chat.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– TomSeeSaw 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

The Canadian government wants more, so that they can send it to Ukraine and to men in skirts that demand the government pays for 'em to have both sets of sex organs.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– RoulerBleu 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

Didn't this retard recently exempt Netflix from sales taxes?

Why is Castro's bastard spawn insulting our intelligence again?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– TheStupidPrizeWinner 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

No consequences means no incentive to change which leads to the same behavior and similar outcomes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– EggShenBusTours 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

Moochers need to fund their faggotry projects

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– NatalieBiden 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

“to fund anti white propaganda”

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

Taxing anti-White propaganda to fund different anti-White propaganda

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– nuggetpatrol 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Taxing companies not based in Canada because of a Canadian law. That's a very smart decision and I'm sure they didn't just think this all the way through and forget jurisdiction, and the ability to tax something you don't own, in a country that isn't yours, using laws they do not have to abide by.

This has all the hallmarks of the Liberal government attached to it. Watch it cost taxpayer money somehow too. That'd surely be worth it.

Fucking morons.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– simian 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

If a company is generating revenue in a country, that country absolutely has the right to tax that revenue. That usually takes the form of a Value Added Tax (VAT).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– nuggetpatrol 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Canada has 4 streaming services, 5 if you include Netflix Canada. There's StackTV, RiverTV, JustWatch and Crave. Crave being the most popular because it's not tied directly to any other service. You need amazon prime to watch StackTV for example.

Taxes like this just scream "No one cares about those other things, so we have to take your money to prop up the things no one cares about."

And that's not an effective way to keep those things going.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– blyat56 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Counteroffer: Canada gets nothing, their citizens can buy VPNs if they want to watch our slop.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– alucard13mmfmj 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

isnt that how it works anyways?? hit shows and old shows being used to fund/subsidize shitty ass woke shows.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

ie Frenchies

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Decrixxx 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I'm am in favor of taxing streaming services to pay for your country content actually... It's just that this is chanada or canaindia so...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– subbookkeeper 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

If a real country did this, I would actually consider it rather based.

International streaming services are a major factor in globohomo. This is essentially a tarriff on foreign goods. But unlike cars or washing machines, where the economic argument is dicey, there is a much greater argument that the cultural impact is far more dangerous. 5% is actually not enough for what amounts to the dumbing down and mind melt that is bingeing on streaming services.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– KekistanPM 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Tomorrow's headline probably: "Streaming services increase customer rates."

Saturday's headline probably: "Canada launches investigation into streaming service business practices."

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Knife-TotingRat 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

"local".

I remember when locally-produced TV shows were a thing on stations the CBC bought up. Then they killed those and local news in/by the early 80s. Then the only place to get news that wasn't American or Toronto-centric was the newspaper. And we watched Detroit stations for accurate weather.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy