15
TheStupidPrizeWinner 15 points ago +15 / -0

Lol Burning the evidence, immolating the bodies, hiding the sex dungeon entrances under rubble, then obfuscating everything through using completely inept/compromised investigators. Sounds pretty reasonable to me.

11
TheStupidPrizeWinner 11 points ago +11 / -0

As the joke goes, all women are bi, it is just a question of polar or sexual.

28
TheStupidPrizeWinner 28 points ago +28 / -0

Nothing like a rhetorical question to get one going in the morning.

Archived source article if you want to spend a moment reading AI generated fluff.

9
TheStupidPrizeWinner 9 points ago +9 / -0

What a strange looking fellow! Do you think he supports deviance and tries to defy state law? This archived article from April 2023 implies that the staff under his watch certainly do. Relevant text:

I asked Cameron Rosser if any books had been purchased recently and he said any new books outside the list were only to replace damaged books or replace those that had been in inventory before EFB Local was approved. This was only part true. Several of these titles are brand new books that weren’t even published until after EFB was adopted. More importantly, some of these books don’t comply with EFB. I will be turning in reconsideration forms for these. But the policy has been violated in more ways than one. Some recently purchased items contain rape, drug addiction, underage drinking and a sequence in one about a sex tape.

Could the Bible banning be a tit for tat? I think so.

17
TheStupidPrizeWinner 17 points ago +17 / -0

Are they really saying that their students are so wet, so feeble-minded and so generally namby-pamby that they can’t enjoy Homer?

They have named the module "Women in Homer". I have a feeling that wet, feeble-minded namby-pambies are the target demographic.

2
TheStupidPrizeWinner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Indeed. We usually try to get things we can play together, which sometimes works well and other times not so much. It is difficult to coordinate time together when everyone has families/jobs/obligations.

7
TheStupidPrizeWinner 7 points ago +7 / -0

I wonder what is in the water to make incel tears that shade of blue. Probably the same stuff that is making the frigging frogs gay and the children mildly retarded.

2
TheStupidPrizeWinner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gifts for gaming friends and family. They will most likely return the favor, so I cannot wait to see what kind of grab bag of heavily discounted titles I receive this year.

14
TheStupidPrizeWinner 14 points ago +14 / -0

Nothing indicates the potential of great customer service and quality product than proudly stating "My customers are fucking stupid, and I hate them."

21
TheStupidPrizeWinner 21 points ago +21 / -0

kvetch /kvĕch/

intransitive verb

-To complain persistently and whiningly. noun

-A chronic, whining complainer.

-A nagging complaint.

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition

In a culture where they even have a special term for constant bitching, this is not surprising behavior.

23
TheStupidPrizeWinner 23 points ago +23 / -0

This is not the first time the Innocence Project has been associated with someone who was later charged with murder. Dude was even on the Joe Rogan.

There may be other examples, but this is the first one that I could remember.

6
TheStupidPrizeWinner 6 points ago +6 / -0

Archived, just in case.

I wonder what other fun D words were also populating the rest of the magazine? Defiance? Destroy? Delusional?

5
TheStupidPrizeWinner 5 points ago +5 / -0

From this archived NYT article, it seems the shooter made a phone call moments before the shooting and even visited a Starbucks before that. He may have also used an electric Citi bike to escape.

These seem like odd choices for a "professional", though the call could have been last minute information on the whereabouts of his target.

3
TheStupidPrizeWinner 3 points ago +3 / -0

They seem to be destroying themselves quite nicely. No need to spend our resources.

33
TheStupidPrizeWinner 33 points ago +33 / -0

The course is offered by the Ontario Human Rights Commission, and their latest edition opens with an animated video telling viewers that the Human Rights Code “is not meant to punish.”

Literally three paragraphs above this one:

The Human Rights Tribunal ultimately ordered the Township to pay $10,000 to Borderland Pride, and for McQuaker to personally pay them another $5,000.

They do not punish, they just fine when you do not do what they want when they want in the way they want.

“As a lawyer who does this work that means I’m going to start taking people’s houses and their vehicles and their toys and draining their bank accounts and garnishing their wages because no one is going to stop behaving this way until there are real consequences,” he said.

Using the Human Rights Code for "consequences", not "punishment"! Very different! Not petty or vindictive at all! Thank you for the clarification Borderland Pride director Douglas Judson.

view more: Next ›