4
when_we_win_remember 4 points ago +4 / -0

One time, at the gym, I found a big ol buck knife on the ground. I saw the last guy using the machine, so I try to as nonthreatingly as possible carry this big ass knife and hand it back to him (handle first in its sheath) . That was awkward.

5
when_we_win_remember 5 points ago +5 / -0

The best episodes were the "monster of the week" ones.

2
when_we_win_remember 2 points ago +2 / -0

If I sell it, I have to pay taxes on it now. If I let it go down and wait for it to go back up, I can pay taxes later.

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those were mostly Feds. I don't believe that to be true of PF. The fact that they're not doing anything illegal limits what the Feds can do. A Fed in a mask just looks like another troop. PF structure is actually clever.

7
when_we_win_remember 7 points ago +7 / -0

No doubt all pro white organizations are Fed infiltrated, but I see that as different than "being Feds.". I think it's fine that Rousseau is the face of the group, and the hundreds of others represent the the silent majority.

8
when_we_win_remember 8 points ago +8 / -0

I thought the reason you don't see them at AA is they don't quit. And the whole admitting you have a problem thing isn't very gangsta.

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

The new Ferrari can be seen in how many vehicles they make. I believe it has exploded.

2
when_we_win_remember 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't take it from who is saying what that it causes a lot of cancer. Safe is not a technical term. It's a judgement call. If you could simulate it perfectly, you could decide at what level of glyphosate use more people die from using it than would from side effects of not. Physiology is averaged out by wide sampling in studies, so you have that tool. But people will still disagree on the tradeoff between food production and cancer risk.

A lot of organizations are concerned with one thing: making money, or making food, or preventing cancer. They just come up with the answer that prioritizes what they care about.

3
when_we_win_remember 3 points ago +3 / -0

You have these lefties being like I steal from Walmart. And you have Walmart and other people saying: nooo, you're actually stealing from the neighbors. I don't know. But I know that i always want to live where fewer people steal from Walmart. And from workers. And from the government. Etc. Neither the moral nor practical case of what's right is particularly difficult.

3
when_we_win_remember 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's a school, here, that offers resources for homeschooling and, optionally, 1-3 days a week in a classroom. Pooling your resources, somehow, seems smart. Exactly how to find people who agree with me, I'm still working out.

The public school is precisely white on justice maps. But I would imagine the curriculum itself is cucked as hell.

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

Long time ago... My gf moved into a neighborhood that had like 3 corporations controlling all the housing. And I was shocked because, at this point, there were other places to live. Just not right there. The rate on her 1BR was shocking to me. Luckily, that didn't last long. But yeah, they've been at this business of price fixing, and I've seen it first hand.

Oh and the reason she wanted to move is that her other block was becoming full of criminals and rapists. I wouldn't argue against leaving that. I guess that's how they get you to pay.

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

The complexity of the monetary system is pretty much a ruse. Remember when we were worried stimulus checks would drive inflation? Routinely, the Fed deposits money into big banks without debiting anything. It's not in your bank account, but you can borrow it. That's what creating money is.

The point being, the money doesn't appear into the ether. The government gives it to someone... Else.

I would, here, separate Capitalism (tm) from free markets. You and me trading is fine. The debt-based monetary system requires constant impoverishment. Real tl;dr , it's usury.

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. They've never been free. They wouldn't understand.

As for the life, I'd say it's more like sip tea on the balcony of my government-subsidized flat and hope I don't get raped next. Not the golf course for most of em.

They'd sip tea between nuclear bomb blasts, though. Take that away, and you might have a riot.

5
when_we_win_remember 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's kind of a "vote harder" thing. But I vote for a man, not a party. If there is a man I can stomach running, then I'll vote for him.

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

They just call it a "monitor", and it costs more.

To me, it's pretty safe though that smart TV isn't connected to the internet. Could it theoretically connect to an open Wifi or have a modem? Yeah. But I doubt it.

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

You'd think if the firewall was smart that it would block DNS to other servers. Or proxy them. But I guess that would break things and not be possible for secure DNS.

4
when_we_win_remember 4 points ago +4 / -0

We don't have a lot in common genetically with Israelites*, and we made up most of our religion later, but it's anti Semitic to say we aren't them. - Ashenazi probably

*Yes, I know you can identify jews by gene clusters, but it seems like Palestinians would be more directly descended

2
when_we_win_remember 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was good that ads tried to be entertaining because there were so many in EGM, particularly around Xmas. It would be, feels like, 2/3 ads, but I guess it paid for all the rest of the glossy print.

view more: Next ›