2
jvardrake 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seriously - fuck this guy.

The entire article (not to even mention the no-endorsement ploy) is one massive spin attempt, in which he tries to appear to “get it”, and to be conciliatory, but you barely need to read any further than the micron deep surface to see how he actually feels: he thinks they’ve done/are doing nothing wrong, and it simply infuriates him that some people have tuned them out, and are tuning stuff like Rogan’s podcast in. Oh. They’re also mad that Elon stopped them from 100% controlling the narrative online (and silencing any critics) by spending a bajillion dollars on Twittter,

Likewise with newspapers. We must be accurate, and we must be believed to be accurate. It’s a bitter pill to swallow, but we are failing on the second requirement.

The guy clearly thinks they only suffer from the second problem he laid out - i.e., it’s not that they aren’t reporting professionally, unbiasedly, truthfully, it’s just that the big bad right and Donald Trump have convinced the unwashed masses that they’re lying. Yeah… no. For the last 8 years, all of you assholes have run near 24/7 outright propaganda in an absolutely disgusting attempt to keep “your side” in power. You were wiling to print anything - literally anything (didn’t matter if it was second hand, third hand, completely unsourced, made up, outright bullshit) - so long as you thought it would hurt the right, and help the left. You guys (for any part of the public that is actually engaged enough to pay attention, anyway) suffer from both of your “requirements”, now. You’re completely biased, and full of shit, and people know you’re full of shit.

God, this article infuriates me. I’m so goddamn tired of their attempts to spin everything. Even the no-official-endorsement stuff is absolutely obnoxious spin. Anyone that isn’t a retard knows that, of course, all these people endorse Harris/The Left. That was his whole game here: saying to themselves, “why bother giving the endorsement, when literally everyone knows it’s implicit. This way, we can act like we are being so virtuous, and garner some brownie points! Look how clever a boy I am!”.

TLDR: guy’s teh big mad that his ability to push propaganda, and control the narrative isn’t 100% as strong as he feels it should be.

18
jvardrake 18 points ago +18 / -0

Dang. This guy really didn't hold back. I feel like the (shameful) current Pope is probably going to go after him now.

5
jvardrake 5 points ago +5 / -0

We need to have a little more compassion than that. This particular person is most likely just another super weak willed individual that allowed herself to be indoctrinated into this, and that's what all of this is: indoctrination.

She's owned up to it. She's realized she fucked up. She seems actively engaged in calling out that system of indoctrination, which - in whatever small way - may stand a chance of helping others not fall to her same fate. She deserves a bit of understanding, and compassion for that.

Look - anyone here can read through my comments. I absolutely loathe the radical left with every fiber of my being at this point. That being said, even I have to catch myself, from time to time, and think about what that level of resolve/hatred might be turning me into?

So - the activists that are indoctrinating these people? Go all out. Hold nothing back. These are the ones that need to be driven out. The weak willed people that succumbed to this massive indoctrination campaign? We've got to allow for a bit of compassion. They need to see that they can be allowed a way out to redemption. Yes, they should have been stronger people. They weren't. If they're willing to admit their failures, there has to be some level of forgiveness. Being weak willed doesn't make them subhuman.

"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. When you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss also gazes into you..."

  • Nietzsche
1
jvardrake 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm constantly worried about passing as a female, even though I fucking am one.

LOL. Man. I actually feel bad (just a little bit) laughing out loud at that line, but God - if that line doesn't read exactly like we live in Teh Clown World...

Fuck the left for this. Goddamn, people for being so weak willed that they allowed these activists to entrench themselves like they have.

7
jvardrake 7 points ago +7 / -0
  1. That usually leads to higher trust societies and more peace, see Japan and Switzerland

This one always drives me so mad. It does so because reddit is absolutely filled to the brim with outright weebs, and on top of them, there is nary a person that isn't always heaping praise on Japan whenever it comes up in any discussion: on its culture; on its train system; on how "everything is so clean!"; on how it's low crime; on how everyone is respectful....

Look - I am married to a woman from there. If I add up all the trips we have taken there to be with her relatives, I've spent more than a year of my life there. Everytime I'm there, it feels so refreshing (and I say this even living in a super nice place in the US). I love Japan, and don't ever want to see it change. People exaggerate (somewhat) how good things are, but - of the things they are praising Japan for - the vast majority of it is better, directly because of the fact that they lack the exact same diversity the left is trying to ram down everyone else's throats.

It turns out that, when everyone is from roughly the same background, shares roughly the same ideals, grows up in roughly the same manner, and feels a sense of national being, society has a lot less friction, can be a lot higher trust, and a lot better, in just about every way. The time I spend over there, makes me imagine that that's what it must have been like to exist in the earlier version of the United States. That that's what it must have been to live in the US pre allowing the left to start destroying society.

So, anyhow, it's infuriating how those same shitbag leftists absolutely refuse to make the connection. Diversity - on the scale that the left wants to use to destroy all western nations - is most certainly NOT a strength. The diversity they want just creates nations with no shared culture, no trust, no one feels any obligations, everyone's at everyone else's throats, and it doesn't fucking work.

The stuff all the idiots admire/praise Japan for all exists because the left hasn't been allowed to destroy it (yet).

1
jvardrake 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's about sending a message

Now I'm imaging the Heath Ledger Joker jumping off the top of a giant pair of boobs, and sliding down the cleavage.

6
jvardrake 6 points ago +6 / -0

Delta has been in the news lately for this: Marine Veteran Removed from Flight for Wearing Shirt About Veteran Suicide\

Basically, one (or more) of their flight attendants booted some marine woman off the plan for wearing a shirt that said: "Do not give in to the war within. End veteran suicide."

Combining that story with this new comedian one, it sure seems like there is a massive infestation of rabid radical leftists at Delta. Kicking the marine veteran off the flight for that shirt was bad enough, but it's utterly ridiculous that they think they are going to patrol fucking Twitter, and look for people to ban from flying based on jokes.

It's just all so tiresome. Watching these activists infest everything, and then use whatever power they can get their hands on to attack their political opponents is so fucking tiresome.

14
jvardrake 14 points ago +14 / -0

Stop allowing communists to run for office

It really does have so much to do with this. The shitbag left abuses our western values to get themselves entrenched into places of power, then - once they are in - they start removing the protections those values provided.

"When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom, because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom, because that is according to my principles."

  • Frank Herbert (Author of Dune)

It's literally just like that. Our system cannot survive without gatekeeping the shitbag left out.

8
jvardrake 8 points ago +8 / -0

None of this is baffling to me. This is a direct result of what happens when you allow one political party to set up a gigantic indoctrination and propaganda system.

2
jvardrake 2 points ago +2 / -0

If Trump wins it won’t really matter. If he passes strict immigration laws blue states won’t comply and the GOP is to weak willed to hold them accountable.

I believe this as well, though I want to add my usual. The reason the GOP won't hold them accountable is the same reason as always - the left controls the media (the traditional, and - most importantly - the internet based information). Whenever the GOP tries to respond in kind, to hold the left accountable, or whatever, the media just absolutely blasts the country with endless stories about how bad the right is, how they are "abusing" their power, how it's racist, etc. The GOP can be doing the exact same thing the DNC literally just did, and it doesn't matter - the media still springs into action, ignores/minimizes what the DNC did, and just absolutely RIPS on the right. This constant propaganda works on the large, disinterested, masses in the middle.

Once again (and, as always) that is the primary source of all our problems. Our system simply cannot survive in an environment in which only one party is held accountable, and only one party gets to decide what the "truth" is. The party that has that power can get away with almost anything it wants, and the party being persecuted by that power is nigh powerless to do anything at that point.

In any event, I think your first sentence hits the hardest. If Kamala wins, we get 4-8 more fucking years of massive illegal immigration changing our demographics until the entire country is in the same situation as California. Basically, it's going to be really hard to come back from. If Trump wins, we get 4 years of watching that aforementioned media going ULTRA negative on everything, finally reporting on how bad the economy is, and using Trump as the scapegoat. He'll probably be paralyzed from doing anything, just like last time, and after 4 years of constant media induced negativity (I really hope people remember how pervasive it was), the left will springboard back into power again (under the banner of "change"), and all we will have gotten is that 4 year reprieve.

Sure, if Trump wins, it's going to be super cathartic to watch/enjoy the Tantrum of all Tantrums, but it's still not going to mean much with regards to the course the country is on.

Until the left's ability to set/control the narrative the masses are forced to consume is taken seriously, and destroyed, nothing else can change. If we did destroy that, then - and only then - we could finally start doing the things to actually fix the country. We could start rooting these radicals out of all the places they have entrenched themselves (starting with education, and government), deporting the people who are here illegally, putting a stop to the immigration of people who don't share our values, etc.

Until then - as much as people don't want to hear it - the only hope is to have lots of kids, and make sure you are the one that "indoctrinates" them, before the left has a chance. It's the only way you are going to raise an army big enough to fight these people.

12
jvardrake 12 points ago +12 / -0

Seriously - white people should face accountability, but not for what CNN thinks. White people should face accountability for being the only "race" stupid enough to allow the constant bullshit, the radical shitbag left has been putting out, to indoctrinate them into this asinine world view, where they hate themselves for their ancestors being successful (and having flaws, like every other "race"). No other "race" (it's not even the white race, it's just the leftists) is dumb enough to have a negative in-group bias. Literally every other group of people sees themselves as better than everyone else, but the stupid shitbag left.

Fuck the left. Fuck the people who are stupidly allowing themselves to be manipulated into destroying everything their ancestors built, fought, and died for. Especially fuck the leftists who aren't content hating themselves, but try to indoctrinate and propagandize our kids into doing it, too.

10
jvardrake 10 points ago +10 / -0

Literally the worst case scenario? As a Giants fan, now forced to hope for the Yankees to win.

23
jvardrake 23 points ago +23 / -0

It's the same problem as usual. The left has near total control of what gets disseminated to the disinterested masses in the middle. It's great that O'Keefe is finding proof of what we all already know is going on, but it's not like anything is going to come out of it. The media just won't report on this, and the tech companies that control public discussion will make sure this doesn't reach the people in the middle.

We have made a really big fucking mistake letting the shitbag left get entrenched like this. It's extremely hard to do anything about their system of indoctrination and propaganda because they control access to the masses in the middle, and they just protect themselves.

Musk had to invest like what - 40 BILLION fucking dollars - to even put a small crack in the system they have created, and the entire apparatus of the left has been busily going about destroying Twitter, in an attempt to make it worthless, directly because they no longer control it.

8
jvardrake 8 points ago +8 / -0

She went on the 'call her daddy podcast' recently and despite how shit she is at talking, is trying to be on the Joe Rogan podcast simply because of the views and Trump may be going on it soon.

I think it's for one simple reason, and it's the same reason as always. She's went on Fox, and is supposedly going on Rogan, for the same reason:

  1. They know that the sorts of people that watch Fox are highly unlikely to ever vote for Harris in the first place, so they lose nothing by her looking bad to those people that will actually be watching.
  2. They know they 100% control the mainstream media, and the tech companies.
  3. Everyone else is going to hear about what transpired in that interview via that same mainstream media, and the tech companies.
  4. The media and the tech companies are going to spin the fuck out of how the interview went, and the narrative they set with that spin is going to be the narrative that the disinterested, uninformed, masses in the middle believe.

Look at the day after the big bad Fox interview. Here is what those disinterested masses saw/heard about it (if they saw anything about it at all):

Yeah...

So, anyhow, that's why she did it. That same sort of spin is all over Reddit. It's all over YouTube. It's being push notificationed to people's phones via the news apps on Android and iPhone. It's down in the right hand corner of people's Window's desktop under "Breaking News". Teens had it fed to them under "Breaking News" if they used the YouTube App on the PlayStation/Xbox.

The bottom line is that people on the left aren't going to change their vote no matter what. People on the right (the sorts that would watch Fox) aren't going to change their vote no matter what. Everyone else - the disinterested masses - gets the interview(s) filtered down to them via the media, and via the tech companies. The Harris camp likely knows it's super close, and they also know they will get to decide how those companies spin these interviews, so there is nothing to lose, and everything to gain (they only need to flip a little bit of those people in the middle to win).

As always - the left's indoctrination and propaganda system needs to be destroyed. It is the single thing that enables everything they do.

7
jvardrake 7 points ago +7 / -0

And they wonder

No they don't. I don't get why people keep thinking these assholes are stupid. They 100% know why their stuff is failing. They know we don't want their politics. They just don't care. They are completely bought in to this ideology where they are the virtuous anointed teachers, and it's their job/right to re-educate us benighted masses.

They are going to keep forcing it down our throats until someone makes them stop.


be·night·ed <-- This is us
/bəˈnīdəd/
adjective]

  1. in a state of pitiful or contemptible intellectual or moral ignorance, typically owing to a lack of opportunity.

Thomas Sowell wrote a wonderful book about these people. The Vision of the Anointed - Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy. That book is where I found that perfect description of how the left views themselves, and the rest of us: The Anointed, and the benighted.

3
jvardrake 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's the same thing with feminism, which is closely related to leftism: how many super attractive feminists do you see?

Both of these ideologies are based on the same thing - there are people that can't "win" in the currently dominant systems (either because they are too ugly, too lazy, too low-iq, whatever), so they want to change the system into one where they are at the top, all of a sudden.

The proponents of those new systems are those people, and the others they manage to indoctrinate when they get into positions that allow them to do that.

Seriously - a super attractive girl doesn't need feminism. They're already greatly benefiting in the current system. Why would they want to change it to something where they don't have an advantage? It'd be asinine.

6
jvardrake 6 points ago +6 / -0

Seriously - these people are fucking insufferable. The Tesla robot face looks literally nothing like the robots in that movie. What exactly are they fucking claiming then? That no one can make a humanoid shaped robot without it plagiarizing the movie?

They are just never going to shut the fuck up about Musk now. He broke one small part of their monopoly on controlling the narrative by taking Twitter away from them (they still control everything else), and they will be absolutely seething over it forever.

6
jvardrake 6 points ago +6 / -0

Change and Hope turned quickly to stagnation and unhappiness. Individualism shunned for collective lying and mockery of those not taking part.

Change and hope were never anything more than a campaign slogan to sucker people into voting based on their perceived collective guilt (that leftist activists/radicals indoctrinated people into having) of the country's past history with prejudice and slavery.

Zero (good) change came from Obama presidency. Things (with regards to both government and society) only changed for the worse.

The media used the color of his skin to make him nigh unassailable - even today, we still see shitbags in the media, and idiots all over reddit, parrot the bullshit about how "he was scandal free! all he did was wear a tan suit! huRURrrRRRRrr..." - and all he did was implement as much of the leftist agenda, pushing our country ever further to the left, as possible.

It's also still hilarious to me that the media got this guy - a "black" guy - elected, and yet somehow they also used that to absolutely destroy race relations in this country. Things are dramatically worse than they were when I was in high school in the late 90s. It's crazy how much worse they are now.

Hope and change, and everything the left is up to, is all bullshit. They simple want to use whatever it takes to tear down our country, and remake it with in total control. That's the only change that interests them.

4
jvardrake 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s still a front page r/popular sub. Even if the disinterested masses don’t take the time to actually read the article/comments, millions of those people scroll past it, see the ridiculous headline, and have the narrative colored by it.

Blasting the world with endless propaganda has an effect.

4
jvardrake 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why? The left has near total domain over how our children are educated. Once they are out of school, they have near total control over how they are propagandized.

If people don't take an extremely active role in their children's upbringing - in particular, in pointing out the left's indoctrination, and propaganda - those children will naturally end up with leftist views on the world.

6
jvardrake 6 points ago +6 / -0

They do it because it works.

Look at how this one is playing out:

People who are already hardcore in either the left or right camps aren't going to be swayed to change their vote no matter what. Thus, the only votes that are up for grabs are the largely disinterested masses in the middle.

The people in the middle aren't the sorts of people that are going to sit down and watch a debate, much less the Vice Presidential debate. They aren't the sorts of people that are going to go investigate what actually happened. All they are going to hear about this is what they might bumble into in a 10 second clip from the media, what they might happen upon in some front page reddit sub, etc. When that happens, who is going to be the one that was in charge of writing that narrative, and what will it be?

Oh, stuff like this:

and this:

And on, and on, and on.

The point is the same as always. The right has almost zero power to reach anyone not already on the right. The left has near total control over what the idiotic/disinterested masses in the middle stumble into during the business of going about their day. Thus - once again, the same as always - the left does whatever it wants to generate something - anything - that allows them to spin up a bunch of clips, articles, whatever that they can blast the public with, and hopefully set the narrative, and what is the narrative that these people will happen upon? "JD Vance was upset that he lied, and they wouldn't let him get away with it!!!"

It doesn't matter if Vance was right. It doesn't matter that the leftist moderators broke the rules they agreed to. None of the people in the middle (or, more accurately, I guess, - a far greater portion of the people in the middle) are going to hear that. They're only going to hear how the left spun it. That's why they do it. The left has the ability to have a constant dark cloud hanging over anyone not in their camp.

2
jvardrake 2 points ago +2 / -0

Speaking of which, here is a quote from the same dumbass congresswoman on asSAuLt rifles:

“I’ve held an AR-15 in my hand, I wish I hadn’t, It is as heavy as 10 boxes that you might be moving and the bullet that is utilized, a .50 caliber, these kinds of bullets, need to be licensed and do not need to be on the street.”

Every single thing she says there is total and complete bullshit:

  • It's not heavy. Depending on what kind of parts a particular one utilizes, and what's mounted on it, we're usually talking about anywhere from 6 to 10 lbs.
  • It does NOT fire 50 fucking caliber bullets. Top here is AR-15 5.56 vs 50 cal on bottom
  • Does anyone really believe this dumbass old woman is strong enough to hold 10 moving boxes? What does that even mean here? This part is so dumb, it's just impossible to let slide.

So, anyhow - in a sane world, the entirety of the media would point how how thoroughly and monumentally stupid everything she said here was. They would then also do the obvious thing, and draw the conclusion - wait a minute... if this person is this stupid/uninformed, why in the hell should she ever be allowed to be in a position where she can make/influence laws on this? Nah - almost the entire media covered for her on it.

Again - the left's ability to set/control the narrative MUST be attacked and destroyed. We are never going to effect any serious change without doing that.

3
jvardrake 3 points ago +3 / -0

So they're going to have to start thinking that it's acceptable to distance someone's actions from their work. Which then means J.K Rowling is fine too.

Wait a minute - you're thinking the left is going to brought to heel by pointing out that it's a double standard?

9
jvardrake 9 points ago +9 / -0

That's not even the half of it. Things are worse than that - way worse than that. The prosecution would like to present exhibit A: this stupid asshole ->

Sheila Jackson Lee tells Texas students 'planet' moon is 'made up of mostly of gases'

Seriously - take the minute or two it requires to read that. That stupid - stupid - asshole not only managed to "earn" a Bachelor of Arts in political science from Yale University in 1972, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Virginia School of Law in 1975, but she was also elected as a US Congresswoman for 16 fucking terms. Seriously:

"You’ve heard the word ‘full moon,’" Jackson Lee told the students who were with her on a sports field before the eclipse. "Sometimes, you need to take the opportunity just to come out and see a full moon is that complete-rounded circle, which is made up mostly of gases. And that’s why the question is: Why or how could we as humans live on the moon? Are the gases such that we could do that?" "The sun is a mighty powerful heat, but it’s almost impossible to go near the sun. The moon is more manageable."

Not satisfied with just dispensing that wisdom (she clearly believes that the moon is something akin to the sun, and that's why it glows...) to the kids, she followed up with:

"What you will see today will be the closest distance that the moon has ever been in the last 20 years, which means that’s why they will shut the light down, because they will be close to the Earth, which is an amazing experience," Jackson Lee said in a live video clip posted to her X account. "You will be able to tell because there will be complete darkness."

When she was confronted by those in the media not on the left, she countered with this:

"Obviously I misspoke and meant to say the sun, but as usual, Republicans are focused on stupid things instead of stuff that really matters. What can I say though, foolish thinkers lust for stupidity!"

And that was the end of it. Seriously - the vast majority of our media was satisfied with that. That, which upon any inspection whatsoever (In what way could she be speaking about the sun? She's saying that she was talking about us landing on the fucking sun???) makes absolutely zero sense, was a fine explanation. It was more than enough to just say, "HurrRrr!!1 I'm not dumb! It's the REPUBLICANS that are foolish!", and insinuate they're being racist. So long as you are part of the media's party, that was good enough. Oh, I left something out, too... Not only was this woman, that the media was protecting, a congresswoman, she previously sat on the House's Science, Space and Technology Committee!

It's simply incredible that you can be that fucking stupid, and still have the left, their ideology, and - most importantly - their indoctrination/propaganda system, ram you through two degrees, get you elected 16 fucking times, and help you achieve a net worth in excess of $3.5M USD (despite never doing anything but being a shit-tier politician). There is zero way this person should ever have been allowed in any sort of position where they could exercise power over other people, and yet here we are: because the left has this indoctrination/propaganda system, they can get away with almost anything. There are far - far - too many hard-working people busting way too much ass for it to be anything less than a supreme insult that this person was helped and enabled by that system to achieve all that, whilst those other people have to settle for so much less. It's disgusting.

Edit: I'm still just absolutely flabbergasted at how stupid her statements on the moon are, and yet how authoritatively she felt compelled to speak to the students. Somehow (and we all know how it probably happened) this person was able to get a BA and a law degree - from big time colleges, too. Even if she didn't know a lot of science, or astronomy, you'd think that someone (supposedly) that educated would be able to reason her way through the moon not being a gas giant, or a star. Even if she were never in college at all, she was 19 fucking years old when we landed on the goddamn thing. I'm guessing it was... you know - a pretty big deal when it happened. How could she not have learned about it then??? It's simply amazing that she was ever allowed to hold power, and the only reason she could is because of what we've allowed the radical left to do to our country. It's crazy.

view more: Next ›