He doesn't know what he's doing, it's in his nature.
Archive: https://archive.is/ZKhh3
Screenshot: https://i.imgur.com/xiL1Z60.png
Muslims are part of the jewish ecosystem. They're teraforming the cities into their natural habitat. Do you think they've been fighting for 10,000 years and just by chance neither side ever won? They're co-dependent species. The goal is to squeeze out all other competitors and enforce their duopoly.
It's a little of both. Anthropic and OpenAI both have a history of lying about the capabilities of their models to drum up hype. Anthropic in particular this time around has achieved some kind of regulatory capture by directly scaring government officials.
However, there is also real danger and capability here and dismissing it as a "chat bot" is uninformed. AI is writing math papers now. Recently Paul Erdős' unit distance conjecture was disproven by an AI model. And you might say, oh well most of a math proof is just trying a bunch of shit to see what works - well guess what, most of hacking is like that too.
Even the free claude model is capable of byte level hacking, I've used it myself.
In mensa we'd joke that the true test of IQ is being able to argue that any of the answers are correct.
We really need some innovation in vtuber models, they're all the same jpg wiggling in the corner looking like they were made in a mobile game character creator. Especially in a driving game you should be showing the back of the characters head to make it look like they're driving. Or have a reverse shot of her in a car seat that triggers when she talks.
Ok but hypothetically if we didn't have a time machine, what would your preferred outcome be?
>Nobody is saying that
This is literally what you are saying when you call him a flip flopper or TACO. You're saying that you don't want him to change his mind and instead stick with bad decisions.
So... do you want him to continue in an unwinnable war? Sunk cost fallacy into another 20 year quagmire?
In a few years everyone is going to either be committing, or the victim of, identity theft. Time to get in on the ground floor.
The only way an AI image validator won't get fooled by an image generator is if the validator is using a better model than the generator or the generator has been sabotaged in some way. Even with a weaker generator model, it'll still fool it sometimes, and hybrid techniques like altering a source photograph or post-processing a generated image would be even more successful. Like most new laws, this is designed to subjugate the already compliant, not actually stop bad actors.
>Start your own website
>Require ID + Selfie
>Use those IDs + Selfies whenever you want
In the past, it's been difficult to prove intent, but these days people record their intent on video and post it to social media themselves. So just don't do that I guess.
>every side finds it unsatisfactory
Traditionally, this is the mark of a good compromise.
Lone gunmen never get fired
It's crazy to have any kind of bond for a murder caught on camera
Book deals are how politicians get paid off. In the old days they had to print them and pulp them, but now with e-books it's just a cash transfer.
He'll have vitiligo and his evil side will be white.
The proper way to implement OS age verification is just entering your birthday when you setup your user account. No online checks or face scans, just enter your birthday on setup. Then any time a website or program wants you to verify your age, it hits an OS API that returns this birthday.
This way, parents could supervise their child during account setup once, instead of all the time at every website (children that will format their OS can't be stopped anyway), AND normal adults will never be bothered by a pointless age gate pop up again.
Anon discovers the Pareto distribution, episode 925091
A more fundamental problem is that in a neural network, everything is connected to everything else. If you artificially remove neuron weights, censor training data, or alter behavior with RLHF, then you're not just changing the target behavior, you're subtly removing capability all across the system.
This is why you'll see better performance in uncensored generative AI models, because they have more general knowledge about what humans look like. Also in recent rounds of censorship updates to chatGPT, the model became more argumentative across the board, because they've artificially juiced the concept of refusal in all scenarios.
Top end asian women look great, but the median white woman is much better looking than the median asian.
What's not accounted for here is that white people are K strategists and the brown hoards are R strategists. Browns have 10 kids and 3 abortions. White "blue hair" women are brainwashed by universities into aborting their first child and it fucks them up emotionally and physically for their whole life. The damage is far greater.
I recognize that account in the screenshots, he's like a cartoon jew stereotype.
https://i.imgur.com/oAF0MNZ.png
Honestly I think it's to the point of baiting for antisemetic comments as part of some sexual fetish or artificial response campaign. Pumping up those hate numbers for the next round of lawfare.
Blender