He looks just like you expect it
(media.scored.co)
Comments (33)
sorted by:
It sucks wanting to have more modest (not UGLY) character models for some games, because I get automatically lumped in with idiots like this guy.
Given the choice between borderline-porn or woke ugliness, I'm taking borderline-porn 100 times out of 100.
Borderline porn because fuck commie antifa faggots.
Attacking video game women is such a pathetic, cowardly way of trying to impose "modesty". Do that on real women.
Change the meta, not the player.
You can yell at someone playing the meta build all you want, and how the off-meta build is so much classier and skillful, but no pro player is going to adopt the tactic unless and until the meta shifts.
Make your own "Nunholy" variant that actually features nuns instead of Spirit of Halloween sexy nuns, showcase that the off-meta works, and shift it.
Guy looks like Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg that grew a mustache and died his hair green.
We approve of the Gary Oldman reference
Yes! Thank you!
About half of those a guy can't really control.
Devil’s advocate: it doesn’t necessarily matter that he can’t control them; they’re still (mostly) signals of good genetics and perfectly normal to find desirable. On the other end of things, if you find a hunchbacked retard you’re not going to give him a shot just because he can’t control that, and you shouldn’t feel bad for not being interested.
Of course, to go back to earth for a moment, the thing is that all of those in combination are insanely rare. In fact, 6’5”+ is pretty damn rare on its own, much less adding any other standards on top. If that’s your criteria, you damn well better be some kind of 10/10 knockout model who cooks, cleans, and is good company because that’s roughly the female equivalent of what you’re demanding. And that’s the issue: not that people find things that are attractive attractive—that’s healthy, in fact—but that women (and men are guilty of this too, but women much more so) are not willing or able to say “well sure it would be nice to have an utterly devoted rich guy who looks like peak Brad Pitt, but my league is much more in line with the average guy and that’s perfectly fine because there are plenty of average guys I can be happy with.”
It’s just a bunch of lies.
Most men in the real world are looking for three things: not fat, loyal, nice to me (and the first one is negotiable). People are framing these “demands” as unreasonable because feminism says you can’t set any standards at all for women. You have to want fat cunts who are free to endlessly pursue other men.
Women, on the other hand, really are looking for Mr. Perfect because society has conditioned them to believe they deserve no less. If women’s standards were “not short, not fat, has a job”, we’d be fine. But their standards are “tall, fit, rich”, and that’s like 2% of the population.
Notice, btw, that women don’t care if you’re loyal or nice to them.
If you ever want to put a number on how delusional female standards can get, some guy made a calculator using US Census data.
https://igotstandardsbro.com/
I statistically would be extinct
I entered
And got 16.4%, which seems small on the surface, but is 30% of the younger adult white male population. That's still millions of people.
Then I realized - I'm a man with a functioning brain and not the website's intended audience.
Having a nasty and disloyal piece of shit husband or boyfriend is good. It makes it all the more easy to convince people, courts, media, and authorities that they were abused and are thus entitled to at least half his resources, media presence, books deals, and likes on social media. Otherwise, they have to lie, which is a headache for them to do, and there's a small chance they might get caught.
Yes, everyone has ideals for a partner. But these women aren't factoring dates for eugenic purposes, they are looking for social status. Is there a subconscious evolutionary component that plays into their preferences, sure. But a dig dick doesn't make a better semen deliverer than a small one. That's not a biological necessity that's a lustful one
The interesting thing re: big dick is that I remember hearing it has some degree of positive correlation with things like height, income, and intelligence so it may actually be part of a good package. That said, I don’t know exactly how large the correlation was or—always a concern these days—if the study replicates. But, I wouldn’t entirely be surprised to learn that having a large dick actually does provide some intangible positives even if it’s just a small boost to confidence, which can be valuable on its own.
Pun intended?
Yes, thanks for noticing.
Men at least have some self-awareness of where they stand on the attractiveness scale, and don't rate 80% of women as below average.
I don't think they can be happy with an average guy. The shitty culture obviously cranks the intensity of the problem up to 11, but their inability to appreciate any man outside the top 10ish percent is innate regardless of their own SMV. That's why there's no perfect solution to the woman question. Letting them do what they want results in Chad chasing and the betas lose incentive to give beyond the bare minimum. Forcing them to settle for their SMV match and treat him as something approaching human requires, among other things, feeding men lies about female nature. That makes them susceptible to feminist lies, which inevitably brings the whole enterprise crashing down.
you sure that isn't a chick playing pretend?
Women having standards is good. I find their standards quite low, normally. But the standards listed there, you wouldn't even find a man in Sweden who fits them all.
It's funny how negroid sheboons, the absolute, under the bottom of the barrel in dating, think they can have a list of requirements.
So men having aesthetic standards bad, women having aesthetic standards (and financial ones) good.
>Maybe if you worried less about your character's jobs and more about finding an actual one, you wouldn't need to play pretend with your artificial hyperintelligence cartoons.
What? Your characters jobs? Is this supposed to be a euphemism? Artificial hyper intelligence? Is that supposed to be sarcastic or referencing something? It's like he tried so hard to find a clever turn of phrase that he malfunctioned. We need to file a support ticket and get this guy debugged.
He is both a mongrel and a homo, so the fact he can even use a computer is a miracle.
women having standards is not a problem, unless they complain that nobody meets them.
I hate anyone and everything in this picture.
Hate it when they say"Muh realism" when it comes to female characters... when there is magic, zombies, healing your stab wound with herbs and a fat bitch being the center of attention. All those things are unrealistic.
that list describes men which are minority^5 (money, dick size, height, no gaming hobby, good with hands), so good luck with that lmao