He looks just like you expect it
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Devil’s advocate: it doesn’t necessarily matter that he can’t control them; they’re still (mostly) signals of good genetics and perfectly normal to find desirable. On the other end of things, if you find a hunchbacked retard you’re not going to give him a shot just because he can’t control that, and you shouldn’t feel bad for not being interested.
Of course, to go back to earth for a moment, the thing is that all of those in combination are insanely rare. In fact, 6’5”+ is pretty damn rare on its own, much less adding any other standards on top. If that’s your criteria, you damn well better be some kind of 10/10 knockout model who cooks, cleans, and is good company because that’s roughly the female equivalent of what you’re demanding. And that’s the issue: not that people find things that are attractive attractive—that’s healthy, in fact—but that women (and men are guilty of this too, but women much more so) are not willing or able to say “well sure it would be nice to have an utterly devoted rich guy who looks like peak Brad Pitt, but my league is much more in line with the average guy and that’s perfectly fine because there are plenty of average guys I can be happy with.”
It’s just a bunch of lies.
Most men in the real world are looking for three things: not fat, loyal, nice to me (and the first one is negotiable). People are framing these “demands” as unreasonable because feminism says you can’t set any standards at all for women. You have to want fat cunts who are free to endlessly pursue other men.
Women, on the other hand, really are looking for Mr. Perfect because society has conditioned them to believe they deserve no less. If women’s standards were “not short, not fat, has a job”, we’d be fine. But their standards are “tall, fit, rich”, and that’s like 2% of the population.
Notice, btw, that women don’t care if you’re loyal or nice to them.
If you ever want to put a number on how delusional female standards can get, some guy made a calculator using US Census data.
https://igotstandardsbro.com/
I statistically would be extinct
I entered
And got 16.4%, which seems small on the surface, but is 30% of the younger adult white male population. That's still millions of people.
Then I realized - I'm a man with a functioning brain and not the website's intended audience.
Having a nasty and disloyal piece of shit husband or boyfriend is good. It makes it all the more easy to convince people, courts, media, and authorities that they were abused and are thus entitled to at least half his resources, media presence, books deals, and likes on social media. Otherwise, they have to lie, which is a headache for them to do, and there's a small chance they might get caught.
Yes, everyone has ideals for a partner. But these women aren't factoring dates for eugenic purposes, they are looking for social status. Is there a subconscious evolutionary component that plays into their preferences, sure. But a dig dick doesn't make a better semen deliverer than a small one. That's not a biological necessity that's a lustful one
The interesting thing re: big dick is that I remember hearing it has some degree of positive correlation with things like height, income, and intelligence so it may actually be part of a good package. That said, I don’t know exactly how large the correlation was or—always a concern these days—if the study replicates. But, I wouldn’t entirely be surprised to learn that having a large dick actually does provide some intangible positives even if it’s just a small boost to confidence, which can be valuable on its own.
Pun intended?
Yes, thanks for noticing.
Men at least have some self-awareness of where they stand on the attractiveness scale, and don't rate 80% of women as below average.
I don't think they can be happy with an average guy. The shitty culture obviously cranks the intensity of the problem up to 11, but their inability to appreciate any man outside the top 10ish percent is innate regardless of their own SMV. That's why there's no perfect solution to the woman question. Letting them do what they want results in Chad chasing and the betas lose incentive to give beyond the bare minimum. Forcing them to settle for their SMV match and treat him as something approaching human requires, among other things, feeding men lies about female nature. That makes them susceptible to feminist lies, which inevitably brings the whole enterprise crashing down.