2
MattTheBlack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you. For alot of how people here act like they're in the know I've noticed they'll assume stuff and then tell others the same thing as if it's facts. Walsh certainly self censors but he's nowhere close to a neocon or rino. He in fact consistently manages to piss them off because he doesnt compromise on social conservatism. That's why he's the only person at DW I even bother watching anymore.

3
MattTheBlack 3 points ago +4 / -1

Meanwhile this is the exact thing that I've only seen one conservative influencer speak out and warn against beforehand and yall keep insisting he's controlled opposition

1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +1 / -0

He consistently calls out the anti white agenda of the left by name

1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's literally said the opposite repeatedly and constantly advocates against Israel being involved in our government and receiving our money. The only time he's denounced anti semitism was when there was actual violence involved and he opposed all those attempts to legislate against anti semantism. Yall really just make shit up to get mad at.

-3
MattTheBlack -3 points ago +1 / -4

So you feel like he's going to do the same thing he constantly complains about Republicans doing, the thing he was ranting about yesterday. Explain the logic

-4
MattTheBlack -4 points ago +1 / -5

Why is he controlled opposition? Articulate it in 4 sentences or more

1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +2 / -1

Too much escapism is bad and consoomers definitely fall into that

1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well it was originally written by an edgy liberal faggot

2
MattTheBlack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jews being ungrateful? Unbelievable, it's not like the Bible isn't full of examples of that from beginning to end

4
MattTheBlack 4 points ago +4 / -0

One of my friends is friends with his sister and essentially described him as a decent dude surrounded by in my words retards who he is too loyal too for his own good

2
MattTheBlack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even ignoring his personal history of fetishizing his son the gays have a long history of grooming and molesting young boys

1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldn't give him the benefit of the doubt because A. He has a self admitted fetish for high heels and B. He dressed his so in high heels and a dress.

1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lmao there's no maneuvering in the world that's going to get Cheatle off the script she was given by lawyers from the 3 letter agencies

2
MattTheBlack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yall keep saying this as if the junior senators have any power to do anything. The fact is the boomers and gen x just won't upset the status quo. That's not some indictment of the ones that actually expose the shit. What's Hawley going to do without a coalition that can push things through

15
MattTheBlack 15 points ago +15 / -0

Not even close to the same. There's far too much video footage of groups of Indian men swarming women and groping them. Bobs and vagene behavior isn't just online

4
MattTheBlack 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hell I've stated what state I'm in. One dude that might still be around has met me in person by chance

0
MattTheBlack 0 points ago +1 / -1

Presidential immunity as always existed. Yall fear mongering makes you look as intelligent as leftists. The ruling is just restating existing law

0
MattTheBlack 0 points ago +2 / -2

No because we luckily have this process called impeachment

view more: Next ›